| Literature DB >> 31302937 |
Cindy Shehatou1, Stephan L Logunov2, Paul M Dunman1, Constantine G Haidaris1, W Spencer Klubben2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) and multidrug resistant bacteria pose a significant threat to the U.S. healthcare system. With a dearth of new antibiotic approvals, novel antimicrobial strategies are required to help solve this problem. Violet-blue visible light (400-470 nm) has been shown to elicit strong antimicrobial effects toward many pathogens, including representatives of the ESKAPE bacterial pathogens, which have a high propensity to cause HAIs. However, phototherapeutic solutions to prevention or treating infections are currently limited by efficient and nonobtrusive light-delivery mechanisms. STUDY DESIGN/Entities:
Keywords: 405 nm; ESKAPE pathogens; antimicrobial
Year: 2019 PMID: 31302937 PMCID: PMC6916415 DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lasers Surg Med ISSN: 0196-8092 Impact factor: 4.025
Organisms Used in These Studies
| Species | Strain | Reference or source |
|---|---|---|
|
| 824‐05 |
|
|
| UAMS‐1 |
|
| UAMS‐1112 |
| |
|
| 1457 |
|
|
| cKP1 |
|
|
| 98‐37‐09 |
|
|
| PA01 |
|
|
| PMD1001 |
|
|
| Clinical isolate | URMC |
|
| SC5314 |
|
|
| JM109 |
|
List of all pathogens used in this study, their strain, and source or reference.
Strong Memorial Hospital Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Rochester, NY.
Figure 1(a) Photograph of 405 nm light‐diffusing fiber (LDF) illumination system used in this study; clockwise from upper left: 405 nm 750 mW laser, orange transport fiber, Corning® LDF for medical applications wrapped around a hand. (b) Depicting the scattering efficiency differences over ultra violet–visible wavelength range (300–600 nm). As depicted in chart above, Corning® Fibrance® LDF has lower efficiency at 405 nm than does the Corning® LDF for medical fiber used in this study. (c) Two different antimicrobial efficacy assays on agar plates demonstrating the 6 Log and 4 Log reduction of Staphylococcus aureus (left‐spread plate and right‐spot plate). The top half of each agar plate was shielded with an opaque material, the bottom half was exposed to 405 nm light, delivered via the LDF system at 216 J/cm2. (d) Figure depicting the diffusing properties and characteristics of LDF system. The solid purple line in the center depicts the LDF system fiber. Laser light is coming from the left to the right along the z axis with some length (z). The dashed lines represent the power of light at some distance away from the fiber, r. The fluence of the system depends on: laser power, efficiency of the fiber, the distance away from the fiber (r), the length of the fiber (z), and exposure time. Due to the radial symmetry of the fiber illumination, points i, j, and k all have the same fluence, as well as i′, j′, and k′ have an equal fluence. However, due to the exponential decay of the light scattering power along the length of the fiber, the fluence at point i does not equal i′; same with j and j′; and k and k′. Over short distances and when illuminated from both ends of the fiber, such as in this study, differences in illumination fluence can be averaged over the length of the fiber. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com].
Antimicrobial Effect on a Semi‐Solid Surface
| Viability reduction | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | 36 J/cm2 | 72 J/cm2 | 108 J/cm2 | 144 J/cm2 | 180 J/cm2 | 216 J/cm2 | 360 J/cm2 | 540 J/cm2 | Minimum fluence |
|
| – | – | ≤104 | 104 | 104 | 106 | 106 | 106 | 144 |
|
| ≤104 | ≤104 | 106 | 106 | 107 | 106 | 106 | 107 | 72 |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | ≤104 | 104 | 540 |
|
| – | – | – | 105 | 104 | 107 | 104 | 107 | 144 |
|
| – | – | ≤104 | ≤104 | – | 104 | ≤104 | 105 | 144 |
|
| – | – | ≤104 | 104 | 104 | ≤104 | 104 | 104 | 144 |
|
| – | – | – | ≤104 | ≤104 | ≤104 | 105 | 105 | 360 |
|
| 108 | 108 | 108 | 108 | 108 | 108 | 108 | 108 | 36 |
|
| – | ≤104 | ≤104 | ≤104 | ≤104 | 106 | 106 | ≤107 | 216 |
|
| – | – | ≤104 | ≤104 | ≤104 | 105 | 105 | 106 | 216 |
List of antimicrobial efficacy of all organisms tested. Dosing is measured in J/cm2. The right most column represents the minimum radiant energy density dose required to cause a 4‐log reduction in viability. All antimicrobial effects reported are bactericidal. ≤10 indicates >50% reduction in the indicated inoculum; (–) indicates no measurable reduction in inoculum.
Antimicrobial Effect on a Semi‐Solid Surface
| Viability reduction | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | 36 J/cm2 | 72 J/cm2 | 108 J/cm2 | 144 J/cm2 | 180 J/cm2 | 216 J/cm2 | 360 J/cm2 | 540 J/cm2 | |
| Polystyrene |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 103 |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | 102 | 102 | 105 | |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Polypropylene |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 102 |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | 102 | 103 | |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Ceramic Tile |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 102 |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 103 | |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Rubber |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Cloth |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 103 |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | 103 | 104 | 103 | |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
List of antimicrobial efficacy of all organisms tested on abiotic surfaces listed above. Gray indicates conditions that elicited ≥102 reduction in cell viability; (–) indicates no measurable effect.
Antimicrobial Effect Planktonic Growth Conditions
| Organism | Viability reduction1 (J/cm2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31.3 ± 8.8 | 62.7 ± 17.7 | 125.4 ± 35.4 | 250.8 ± 70.8 | |
|
| – | 102 | 104 | 104 |
| Human serum | – | 101 | 102 | 104 |
| Lung surfactant | – | – | – | 104 |
|
| 101 | – | – | – |
|
| – – | – – | – – | – – |
|
| – | 101 | 104 | 104 |
|
| 101 | – | – | – |
|
| 102 | 101 | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | – |
|
| 104 | 104 | 104 | 104 |
|
| – | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | – |
List and results of all bacteria tested in planktonic growth conditions. Gray indicates conditions that elicited ≥102 reduction in cell viability; (–) indicates no measurable effect.