Katherine A Amin1, Una J Lee2, Chengshi Jin3, John Boscardin3, Andrew R Medendorp4, Jennifer T Anger5, Anne M Suskind6. 1. Section of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: katherine.a.amin@gmail.com. 2. Section of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA. 4. Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Tripler Army Medical Center, HI. 5. Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA. 6. Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the associations between frailty indices and postoperative complications among older adults undergoing common urologic procedures. Frailty is known to be strongly associated with poor postoperative complications; however, the optimal way to measure frailty remains unknown. METHODS: We identified the 20 most common urologic procedures from 2013-2016 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Frailty was measured using the NSQIP frailty index, simplified frailty index, and Risk Analysis Index. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed with each index and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification system with postoperative complications (any, major, or minor) as the outcomes. Statistical models were compared using the following fit parameters: area under the curve, Akaike information criterion, and Bayesian information criterion. RESULTS: A total of 158,855 procedures were identified. All frailty indices (NSQIP frailty index, simplified frailty index, and Risk Analysis Index) and ASA were associated with increased odds for any, major, and minor complications (all P values <.001). ASA demonstrated stronger model fit parameters for any, major and minor complications compared to all other indices, with an area under the curve of 0.63, 0.64, and 0.64, respectively (all P values <.001). Adding ASA to each frailty index resulted in slight improvement of model fit parameters (P value <.001). CONCLUSION: ASA slightly outperforms current frailty indices in predicting postoperative complications among individuals undergoing commonly performed urologic procedures. Our findings highlight the need for improved frailty measures for preoperative risk assessment.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the associations between frailty indices and postoperative complications among older adults undergoing common urologic procedures. Frailty is known to be strongly associated with poor postoperative complications; however, the optimal way to measure frailty remains unknown. METHODS: We identified the 20 most common urologic procedures from 2013-2016 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Frailty was measured using the NSQIP frailty index, simplified frailty index, and Risk Analysis Index. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed with each index and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification system with postoperative complications (any, major, or minor) as the outcomes. Statistical models were compared using the following fit parameters: area under the curve, Akaike information criterion, and Bayesian information criterion. RESULTS: A total of 158,855 procedures were identified. All frailty indices (NSQIP frailty index, simplified frailty index, and Risk Analysis Index) and ASA were associated with increased odds for any, major, and minor complications (all P values <.001). ASA demonstrated stronger model fit parameters for any, major and minor complications compared to all other indices, with an area under the curve of 0.63, 0.64, and 0.64, respectively (all P values <.001). Adding ASA to each frailty index resulted in slight improvement of model fit parameters (P value <.001). CONCLUSION:ASA slightly outperforms current frailty indices in predicting postoperative complications among individuals undergoing commonly performed urologic procedures. Our findings highlight the need for improved frailty measures for preoperative risk assessment.
Authors: Daniel E Hall; Shipra Arya; Kendra K Schmid; Casey Blaser; Mark A Carlson; Travis L Bailey; Georgia Purviance; Tammy Bockman; Thomas G Lynch; Jason Johanning Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Robert S Crawford; Richard P Cambria; Christopher J Abularrage; Mark F Conrad; Robert T Lancaster; Michael T Watkins; Glenn M LaMuraglia Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Sudhir Isharwal; Jason M Johanning; Jennifer G Dwyer; Kendra K Schimid; Chad A LaGrange Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Munyaradzi Chimukangara; Melissa C Helm; Matthew J Frelich; Matthew E Bosler; Lisa E Rein; Aniko Szabo; Jon C Gould Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 4.584