Literature DB >> 29366857

A Simplified Frailty Index to Predict Outcomes After Radical Cystectomy.

Niranjan J Sathianathen1, Stephanie Jarosek2, Nathan Lawrentschuk3, Damien Bolton4, Badrinath R Konety2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditional surgical risk indices are notoriously inaccurate, especially for the elderly, so there has been a trend to evaluate frailty instead.
OBJECTIVE: To describe a simplified five-item frailty index for evaluating radical cystectomy outcomes and compare its predictive ability with other risk assessment tools for a total patient cohort and a subgroup of patients aged ≥65yr. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2007 to 2015 was queried for radical cystectomy cases for bladder cancer. A simplified five-item frailty index (sFI) was created based on previously described measures of frailty. OUTCOME MEASUREMENT AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Correlation of the sFI with postoperative outcomes was investigated using multivariate logistic regression analyses. The predictive ability of the sFI was compared to the extended 11-item frailty index, NSQIP risk calculator, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score by comparing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Subgroup analysis was performed for those aged ≥65 yr to evaluate the accuracy of the index in the older age group, for which traditional risk indices are notoriously inaccurate. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 5516 cases identified, 10.7% experienced a Clavien grade ≥3 complication within 30 d of surgery. Individuals with an sFI of 3+ had a greater likelihood of experiencing a major complication (odds ratio 3.22, 95% confidence interval 2.01-5.17). The sFI outperformed the ASA score in predicting major complications and had a similar predictive ability to the more complex 11-item index and NSQIP risk calculator. There was also a significant correlation between the sFI and discharge destination. These relationships were consistent in the subgroup of patients aged ≥65yr. The study is limited by the database, which only records 30-d outcomes and does not allow evaluation of long-term sequelae.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong correlation between frailty assessed via the sFI and radical cystectomy outcomes, including in the elderly. This tool can be used in the clinical setting to counsel patients and aid decision-making. PATIENT
SUMMARY: This study demonstrated that a simple five-item frailty index can be used to assess preoperative risk in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.
Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder carcinoma; Cystectomy; Frailty; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29366857     DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Focus        ISSN: 2405-4569


  16 in total

Review 1.  Frailty as a prognostic indicator in the radical cystectomy population: a review.

Authors:  Niki Parikh; Pranav Sharma
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  "A National Study Demonstrating the Need for Improved Frailty Indices for Preoperative Risk Assessment of Common Urologic Procedures".

Authors:  Katherine A Amin; Una J Lee; Chengshi Jin; John Boscardin; Andrew R Medendorp; Jennifer T Anger; Anne M Suskind
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Which comorbidity classification is best suited to identify patients at risk for 90-day and long-term non-bladder cancer mortality after radical cystectomy?

Authors:  Michael Froehner; Rainer Koch; Ulrike Heberling; Matthias Hübler; Vladimir Novotny; Angelika Borkowetz; Manfred P Wirth; Christian Thomas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The Association of Frailty with Outcomes after Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.

Authors:  Julia F Shaw; Dan Budiansky; Fayza Sharif; Daniel I McIsaac
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Bladder cancer, inflammageing and microbiomes.

Authors:  Austin Martin; Benjamin L Woolbright; Shahid Umar; Molly A Ingersoll; John A Taylor
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 16.430

6.  Feasibility of a geriatric comanagement (GERICO) pilot program for patients 75 and older undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Allison S Letica-Kriegel; Amy L Tin; Garrett M Nash; Nicole E Benfante; Nita McNeil; Andrew J Vickers; Bernard Bochner; Sherri M Donat; Alvin Goh; Guido Dalbagni; Timothy Donahue; Eugene K Cha; Eugene Pietzak; Harry Herr; Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki; Armin Shahrokni
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.037

Review 7.  Frailty assessment in older urological patients prior to surgery: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Andrea Haren; Rajni Lal; David Walker; Rajesh Nair; Judith Partridge; Jugdeep Dhesi
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2020-05-10

Review 8.  Anesthetic considerations for urologic surgeries.

Authors:  Chang-Hoon Koo; Jung-Hee Ryu
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-12-17

Review 9.  Orthotopic Neobladder Reconstruction: Patient Selection And Perspectives.

Authors:  Liang G Qu; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2019-12-11

10.  The Usefulness of the Modified Frailty Index for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Cystectomy.

Authors:  Maarten J H Voskamp; Marloes Vermeer; Gerd-Jan Molijn; Erik B Cornel
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2020-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.