Literature DB >> 31302077

Is There a Benefit to Patients Using Wearable Devices Such as Fitbit or Health Apps on Mobiles? A Systematic Review.

Ara Jo1, Bryan D Coronel2, Courtney E Coakes2, Arch G Mainous3.   

Abstract

Wearable devices have become a standard health care intervention with emerging health care technologies. These devices are designed to promote healthy behaviors and decrease risk for chronic disease like cardiovascular disease and diabetes. The purpose of this study was to provide evidence of the benefit of wearable devices in chronic disease outcomes among adults. Systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, World Health Organization international clinical trials registry platform, BMC ISRCTN registry, and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers was performed based upon the PRISMA guideline. Included articles were randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies with health outcomes published in English up to October 2018. Studies focusing on adults were selected. Three investigators reviewed the selected publications and made agreement on final selection. Of a total of 550 publications extracted, 6 studies met the final criteria. There was little indication that wearable devices provide a benefit for health outcomes. Of the 6 studies examined, only one study showed a significant reduction for weight loss among participants who used wearable devices. No significant reduction was discovered in cholesterol or blood pressure. Among the 6 studies, only one study examined hemoglobin A1c, and it showed a significant reduction in older patients with type 2 diabetes. The current literature evaluating wearable devices indicates little benefit of the devices on chronic disease health outcomes. Wearable devices play a role as a facilitator in motivating and accelerating physical activity, but current data do not suggest other consistent health benefits.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic disease prevention; Metabolic outcomes; Wearable device; Weight loss

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31302077     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  21 in total

1.  Patterns of Use and Key Predictors for the Use of Wearable Health Care Devices by US Adults: Insights from a National Survey.

Authors:  Ranganathan Chandrasekaran; Vipanchi Katthula; Evangelos Moustakas
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 2.  Wearable Health Devices in Health Care: Narrative Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lin Lu; Jiayao Zhang; Yi Xie; Fei Gao; Song Xu; Xinghuo Wu; Zhewei Ye
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.773

3.  Intelligence-Based Spine Care Model: A New Era of Research and Clinical Decision-Making.

Authors:  G Michael Mallow; Zakariah K Siyaji; Fabio Galbusera; Alejandro A Espinoza-Orías; Morgan Giers; Hannah Lundberg; Christopher Ames; Jaro Karppinen; Philip K Louie; Frank M Phillips; Robin Pourzal; Joseph Schwab; Daniel M Sciubba; Jeffrey C Wang; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Frances M K Williams; Shoeb A Mohiuddin; Melvin C Makhni; Nicholas A Shepard; Howard S An; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-11-28

4.  Abnormal Gait Detection Using Wearable Hall-Effect Sensors.

Authors:  Courtney Chheng; Denise Wilson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  The Effects of Heart Rate Monitoring on Ratings of Perceived Exertion and Attention Allocation in Individuals of Varying Fitness Levels.

Authors:  Robyn Braun-Trocchio; Ashlynn Williams; Kaitlyn Harrison; Elizabeth Warfield; Jessica Renteria
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-01-07

6.  The Effect of Wearable Tracking Devices on Cardiorespiratory Fitness Among Inactive Adults: Crossover Study.

Authors:  Lisbeth Hoejkjaer Larsen; Maja Hedegaard Lauritzen; Mikkel Sinkjaer; Troels W Kjaer
Journal:  JMIR Cardio       Date:  2022-03-15

7.  Comparing the Effectiveness of a Wearable Activity Tracker in Addition to Counseling and Counseling Only to Reinforce Leisure-Time Physical Activity among Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sunga Kong; Jae Kyung Lee; Danbee Kang; Nayeon Kim; Young Mog Shim; Won Park; Dooho Choi; Juhee Cho
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Should We Scale-Up? A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of an Intervention Targeting Sedentary Office Workers Using the RE-AIM QuEST Framework.

Authors:  Bradley MacDonald; Ann-Marie Gibson; Xanne Janssen; Jasmin Hutchinson; Samuel Headley; Tracey Matthews; Alison Kirk
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Digital Health Innovations to Improve Cardiovascular Disease Care.

Authors:  Karla Santo; Julie Redfern
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 5.113

10.  Active wearable device utilization improved physical performance and IGF-1 among community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults: a 12-month prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Wei-Ju Lee; Li-Ning Peng; Ming-Hsien Lin; Ching-Hui Loh; Liang-Kung Chen
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 5.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.