Literature DB >> 31301678

Placenta previa and the risk of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jacques Balayla1, Jade Desilets2, Guy Shrem1.   

Abstract

Background Whether placental location confers specific neonatal risks is controversial. In particular, whether placenta previa is associated with intra-uterine growth restriction (IUGR)/small for gestational age (SGA) remains a matter of debate. Methods We searched Medline, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Scopus, ISI Web of Science and Cochrane database search, as well as PubMed (www.pubmed.gov) until the end of December 2018 to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the risk of IUGR/SGA in cases of placenta previa. We defined IUGR/SGA as birth weight below the 10th percentile, regardless of the terminology used in individual studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We used odds ratios (OR) and a fixed effects (FE) model to calculate weighted estimates in a forest plot. Statistical homogeneity was checked with the I2 statistic using Review Manager 5.3.5 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). Results We obtained 357 records, of which 13 met the inclusion criteria. All study designs were retrospective in nature, and included 11 cohort and two case-control studies. A total of 1,593,226 singleton pregnancies were included, of which 10,575 had a placenta previa. The incidence of growth abnormalities was 8.7/100 births in cases of placenta previa vs. 5.8/100 births among controls. Relative to cases with alternative placental location, pregnancies with placenta previa were associated with a mild increase in the risk of IUGR/SGA, with a pooled OR [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 1.19 (1.10-1.27). Statistical heterogeneity was high with an I2 = 94%. Conclusion Neonates from pregnancies with placenta previa have a mild increase in the risk of IUGR/SGA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fetal growth restriction; intrauterine growth restriction; neonatal outcomes; placenta previa; small for gestational age

Year:  2019        PMID: 31301678     DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Med        ISSN: 0300-5577            Impact factor:   1.901


  8 in total

1.  The clinical value of prenatal assessment of cervical length and placental thickness in pregnant women with placenta previa.

Authors:  Xiang Zheng; Ting Li; Min Zeng; Xiubing Cheng; Hongying Rao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Considering intrauterine location in a model of fetal growth restriction after maternal titanium dioxide nanoparticle inhalation.

Authors:  J N D'Errico; S B Fournier; P A Stapleton
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2021-03-23

3.  Placental Lesions and Pregnancy Outcome in Anterior as Compared to Posterior Placenta Previa.

Authors:  Daniel Tairy; Eran Weiner; Letizia Schreiber; Hadas Miremberg; Liat Gindes; Roni Hochman; Jacob Bar; Michal Kovo
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Maternal Pre-pregnancy Body Mass Index Categories and Infant Birth Outcomes: A Population-Based Study of 9 Million Mother-Infant Pairs.

Authors:  Xin'nan Zong; Huan Wang; Liu Yang; Yajun Guo; Min Zhao; Costan G Magnussen; Bo Xi
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-02-17

5.  Clinical Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Placenta Praevia and Perinatal Outcomes in First-Time Pregnant Patients.

Authors:  Chunhua Zhou; Yang Zhao; Yongmei Li
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-22

6.  Prediction of maternal complications and neonatal outcome in dichorionic diamniotic twins with fetal weight discordancy measured by ultrasonography.

Authors:  Hyun Mi Kim; Hyun-Hwa Cha; Won Joon Seong; Hye Jin Lee; Mi Ju Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, May 2020.

Authors:  Marit L Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2020-04-10

8.  Effect of previous placenta previa on outcome of next pregnancy: a 10-year retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lizi Zhang; Shilei Bi; Lili Du; Jingjin Gong; Jingsi Chen; Wen Sun; Xinyang Shen; Jingman Tang; Luwen Ren; Guolu Chai; Zhijian Wang; Dunjin Chen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.