| Literature DB >> 33825166 |
Daniel Tairy1, Eran Weiner2, Letizia Schreiber3, Hadas Miremberg2, Liat Gindes2, Roni Hochman2, Jacob Bar2, Michal Kovo2.
Abstract
The uterine location of placenta previa (PP), anterior vs. posterior has an impact on pregnancy outcome. We aimed to study maternal and neonatal outcome and placental histopathology lesions in anterior vs. posterior PP. The medical records and histopathology reports of all singleton cesarean deliveries (CD) performed due to PP, from 24 to 41 weeks, between 12.2008 and 10.2018, were reviewed. Placental lesions were classified into maternal and fetal vascular malperfusion lesions (MVM, FVM), maternal and fetal inflammatory responses (MIR, FIR). Gestational age (GA) at delivery was similar between the anterior PP (n = 67) and posterior PP (n = 105) groups. As compared to the posterior PP group, the anterior PP group had higher rate of previous CD (p < 0.001), placental accreta spectrum (p = 0.04), lower neonatal Hb at birth (p = 0.03), higher rate of neonatal blood transfusion (p = 0.007) and prolonged maternal hospitalization (p = 0.02). Placentas from the anterior PP group had lower weights (p = 0.035), with increased rate of MVM lesions (p = 0.017). The anterior PP location is associated with increased adverse maternal and neonatal outcome, lower placental weights and increased rate of malperfusion lesions. Abnormal placentation in the scarred uterine wall probably has an impact on placental function.Entities:
Keywords: Anterior placenta previa; Maternal outcome; Neonatal outcome; Placental histopathology; Posterior placenta previa
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33825166 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-021-00558-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Sci ISSN: 1933-7191 Impact factor: 2.924