Literature DB >> 31301634

Brain impedance variation of directional leads implanted in subthalamic nuclei of Parkinsonian patients.

Roberto Eleopra1, Sara Rinaldo2, Grazia Devigili2, Christian Lettieri3, Massimo Mondani4, Stanislao D'Auria4, Massimo Piacentino5, Manuela Pilleri6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Conventional deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems with ring-shaped leads generate spherical electrical fields. In contrast, novel directional leads use segmented electrodes. Aim of this study was to quantify the impedance variations over time in subjects with the directional Cartesia-Boston® system.
METHODS: Impedance records, programming settings, and clinical data of 11 consecutive Parkinsonian patients implanted with DBS directional leads in two Italian centers (Udine and Vicenza) were retrospectively evaluated. Data were collected before starting stimulation (in the operating room and at days 5 and 40) and after switching stimulation on at the successive follow-up visits (1, 6 and 12 months).
RESULTS: Directional leads have significantly higher impedance than ring leads. Stimulated contacts had always lower impedance compared to non-stimulated contacts. Before DBS-on, all contacts had higher impedance in the operating room, with an initial decrease five days post-surgery and a subsequent increase at day 40, more evident for directional contacts. The impedance of directional leads increased post-implantation at 1 and 6 months with a plateau at 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant difference between the directional and ring leads at baseline (before activation of DBS) and during follow-up (chronic DBS). SIGNIFICANCE: Our study reveals new information about the impedance of segmented electrodes that is useful for patient management during the initial test period, as well as during long-term DBS follow-up.
Copyright © 2019 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep brain stimulation; Electric impedance; Electrodes; Neurostimulation; Parkinson disease

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31301634     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  3 in total

1.  Elevated Electrode Impedances During Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery May Be Due to Peri-Electrode Air Collections.

Authors:  Bryan T Klassen; Juliana Rotter; Colleen Crane; Timothy J Kaufmann; Kai J Miller
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-23

2.  Electrochemical and biological performance of hierarchical platinum-iridium electrodes structured by a femtosecond laser.

Authors:  Linze Li; Changqing Jiang; Wanru Duan; Zhiyan Wang; Feng Zhang; Changgeng He; Tiangang Long; Luming Li
Journal:  Microsyst Nanoeng       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 8.006

3.  A New Implantable Closed-Loop Clinical Neural Interface: First Application in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Mattia Arlotti; Matteo Colombo; Andrea Bonfanti; Tomasz Mandat; Michele Maria Lanotte; Elena Pirola; Linda Borellini; Paolo Rampini; Roberto Eleopra; Sara Rinaldo; Luigi Romito; Marcus L F Janssen; Alberto Priori; Sara Marceglia
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.