| Literature DB >> 31299889 |
Ksenia M Klimina1,2, Ekaterina G Batotsyrenova3, Roman A Yunes4, Elena H Gilyaeva3, Elena U Poluektova4, Taisia A Kostrova3, Anna V Kudryavtseva5, Maya V Odorskaya4, Vadim A Kashuro3, Artem S Kasianov4, Maksim B Ivanov3, Valery N Danilenko4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: All living organisms experience physiological changes regulated by endogenous circadian rhythms. The main factor controlling the circadian clock is the duration of daylight. The aim of this research was to identify the impact of various lighting conditions on physiological parameters and gut microbiota composition in rats. 3 groups of outbred rats were subjected to normal light-dark cycles, darkness and constant lighting.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant system; Biological rhythms; Catecholamines; Circadian clock; Desynchronosis; Gut microbiota; Protein expression; Rats
Year: 2019 PMID: 31299889 PMCID: PMC6626387 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-019-1535-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1Catecholamine concentrations in rat urine after 1 and 3 months: a) Dopamine; b) Norepinephrine; c) Epinephrine. *– significant differences compared to LD1 (p < 0,05)
Fig. 2Antioxidant activity after 1 and 3 months: a) Reduced Glutathione; b) Glutathione S-transferase; c) Superoxide dismutase; d) Glutathione peroxidase; e) Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. *– significant differences compared to LD1 (p < 0,05)
Fig. 3Lipid peroxidation products after 1 and 3 months: a) Malondialdehyde; b) Conjugated dienes. *– significant differences compared to LD1 (p < 0,05); # - significant differences between LL1 and DD1 (p < 0,05)
Fig. 4Relative amount of clock proteins in the hypothalamus: a) After 1 month; and b) After 3 months. *– significant differences compared to LD1 (p < 0,05)
Fig. 5The impact of various housing conditions (constant light, constant darkness and normal conditions) on species diversity in rat GM
Fig. 6Ratios of the main bacterial families accounting for more than 1% of the metagenome in logarithmic scale
Fig. 7Ratios of the main bacterial genera accounting for more than 1% of the metagenome in logarithmic scale
Fig. 8Functional properties of rat’s gut microbiota after 1 month of experimental conditions