Literature DB >> 31299079

Functional interplay between DEAD-box RNA helicases Ded1 and Dbp1 in preinitiation complex attachment and scanning on structured mRNAs in vivo.

Neelam Dabas Sen1, Neha Gupta1, Stuart K Archer2, Thomas Preiss3,4, Jon R Lorsch1, Alan G Hinnebusch1.   

Abstract

RNA structures that impede ribosome binding or subsequent scanning of the 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) for the AUG initiation codon reduce translation efficiency. Yeast DEAD-box RNA helicase Ded1 appears to promote translation by resolving 5'-UTR structures, but whether its paralog, Dbp1, performs similar functions is unknown. Furthermore, direct in vivo evidence was lacking that Ded1 or Dbp1 resolves 5'-UTR structures that impede attachment of the 43S preinitiation complex (PIC) or scanning. Here, profiling of translating 80S ribosomes reveals that the translational efficiencies of many more mRNAs are reduced in a ded1-ts dbp1Δ double mutant versus either single mutant, becoming highly dependent on Dbp1 or Ded1 only when the other helicase is impaired. Such 'conditionally hyperdependent' mRNAs contain unusually long 5'-UTRs with heightened propensity for secondary structure and longer transcript lengths. Consistently, overexpressing Dbp1 in ded1 cells improves the translation of many such Ded1-hyperdependent mRNAs. Importantly, Dbp1 mimics Ded1 in conferring greater acceleration of 48S PIC assembly in a purified system on mRNAs harboring structured 5'-UTRs. Profiling 40S initiation complexes in ded1 and dbp1 mutants provides direct evidence that Ded1 and Dbp1 cooperate to stimulate both PIC attachment and scanning on many Ded1/Dbp1-hyperdependent mRNAs in vivo. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research 2019.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31299079      PMCID: PMC7145680          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  49 in total

1.  The 5'-7-methylguanosine cap on eukaryotic mRNAs serves both to stimulate canonical translation initiation and to block an alternative pathway.

Authors:  Sarah F Mitchell; Sarah E Walker; Mikkel A Algire; Eun-Hee Park; Alan G Hinnebusch; Jon R Lorsch
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  In vivo stabilization of preinitiation complexes by formaldehyde cross-linking.

Authors:  Leos Valásek; Bela Szamecz; Alan G Hinnebusch; Klaus H Nielsen
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  Translation factors promote the formation of two states of the closed-loop mRNP.

Authors:  Nadia Amrani; Shubhendu Ghosh; David A Mangus; Allan Jacobson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Mapping RNA-seq Reads with STAR.

Authors:  Alexander Dobin; Thomas R Gingeras
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-09-03

5.  Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome.

Authors:  Ben Langmead; Cole Trapnell; Mihai Pop; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  Reconstitution of yeast translation initiation.

Authors:  Michael G Acker; Sarah E Kolitz; Sarah F Mitchell; Jagpreet S Nanda; Jon R Lorsch
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Specific domains in yeast translation initiation factor eIF4G strongly bias RNA unwinding activity of the eIF4F complex toward duplexes with 5'-overhangs.

Authors:  Vaishnavi Rajagopal; Eun-Hee Park; Alan G Hinnebusch; Jon R Lorsch
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 5.486

8.  Global mRNA selection mechanisms for translation initiation.

Authors:  Joseph Costello; Lydia M Castelli; William Rowe; Christopher J Kershaw; David Talavera; Sarah S Mohammad-Qureshi; Paul F G Sims; Christopher M Grant; Graham D Pavitt; Simon J Hubbard; Mark P Ashe
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Improved Ribosome-Footprint and mRNA Measurements Provide Insights into Dynamics and Regulation of Yeast Translation.

Authors:  David E Weinberg; Premal Shah; Stephen W Eichhorn; Jeffrey A Hussmann; Joshua B Plotkin; David P Bartel
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  The ribosomal protein Asc1/RACK1 is required for efficient translation of short mRNAs.

Authors:  Mary K Thompson; Maria F Rojas-Duran; Paritosh Gangaramani; Wendy V Gilbert
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  12 in total

1.  Reprogramming of translation in yeast cells impaired for ribosome recycling favors short, efficiently translated mRNAs.

Authors:  Swati Gaikwad; Fardin Ghobakhlou; David J Young; Jyothsna Visweswaraiah; Hongen Zhang; Alan G Hinnebusch
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 2.  Selective footprinting of 40S and 80S ribosome subpopulations (Sel-TCP-seq) to study translation and its control.

Authors:  Susan Wagner; Jonathan Bohlen; Anna Herrmannova; Jan Jelínek; Thomas Preiss; Leoš Shivaya Valášek; Aurelio A Teleman
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 17.021

Review 3.  Action and function of helicases on RNA G-quadruplexes.

Authors:  Marco Caterino; Katrin Paeschke
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.647

4.  Post-transcriptional regulation of ATG1 is a critical node that modulates autophagy during distinct nutrient stresses.

Authors:  Vikramjit Lahiri; Shree Padma Metur; Zehan Hu; Xinxin Song; Muriel Mari; Wayne D Hawkins; Janakraj Bhattarai; Elizabeth Delorme-Axford; Fulvio Reggiori; Daolin Tang; Joern Dengjel; Daniel J Klionsky
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 13.391

5.  Distinct interactions of eIF4A and eIF4E with RNA helicase Ded1 stimulate translation in vivo.

Authors:  Suna Gulay; Neha Gupta; Jon R Lorsch; Alan G Hinnebusch
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  eIF1 discriminates against suboptimal initiation sites to prevent excessive uORF translation genome-wide.

Authors:  Fujun Zhou; Hongen Zhang; Shardul D Kulkarni; Jon R Lorsch; Alan G Hinnebusch
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.942

7.  eIF3 and Its mRNA-Entry-Channel Arm Contribute to the Recruitment of mRNAs With Long 5'-Untranslated Regions.

Authors:  Andrei Stanciu; Juncheng Luo; Lucy Funes; Shanya Galbokke Hewage; Colin Echeverría Aitken
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-01-11

Review 8.  Control of translation by eukaryotic mRNA transcript leaders-Insights from high-throughput assays and computational modeling.

Authors:  Christina Akirtava; Charles Joel McManus
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 9.957

9.  A trans locus causes a ribosomopathy in hypertrophic hearts that affects mRNA translation in a protein length-dependent fashion.

Authors:  Franziska Witte; Jorge Ruiz-Orera; Camilla Ciolli Mattioli; Susanne Blachut; Eleonora Adami; Jana Felicitas Schulz; Valentin Schneider-Lunitz; Oliver Hummel; Giannino Patone; Michael Benedikt Mücke; Jan Šilhavý; Matthias Heinig; Leonardo Bottolo; Daniel Sanchis; Martin Vingron; Marina Chekulaeva; Michal Pravenec; Norbert Hubner; Sebastiaan van Heesch
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  mRNA structural elements immediately upstream of the start codon dictate dependence upon eIF4A helicase activity.

Authors:  Joseph A Waldron; David C Tack; Laura E Ritchey; Sarah L Gillen; Ania Wilczynska; Ernest Turro; Philip C Bevilacqua; Sarah M Assmann; Martin Bushell; John Le Quesne
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.