| Literature DB >> 31297992 |
Alexandre Xavier1, Maren Fridtjofsen Olsen2,3, Liss A Lavik3, Jostein Johansen2, Ashish Kumar Singh3, Wenche Sjursen2,3, Rodney J Scott1,4, Bente A Talseth-Palmer1,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lynch-like syndrome (LLS) represents around 50% of the patients fulfilling the Amsterdam Criteria II/revised Bethesda Guidelines, characterized by a strong family history of Lynch Syndrome (LS) associated cancer, where a causative variant was not identified during genetic testing for LS.Entities:
Keywords: Genetics; Lynch syndrome; MMR gene panel; germline mutation; high-throughput sequencing
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31297992 PMCID: PMC6687620 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.850
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med ISSN: 2324-9269 Impact factor: 2.183
Figure 1Mismatch repair pathway major steps with genes associated. Genes in red are the one usually screened for mutations in a clinical setting. MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6 are all involved in the recognition of DNA damage. PMS2 has an endonuclease function in nicking around the damaged region. EXO1 will then remove the DNA strand containing the error and RPA (Replication Protein A) will protect the remaining single strand of DNA. The DNA polymerase Polδ resynthesises the new DNA strand which is then ligated with a ligase (based on Hsieh & Yamane, 2008)
Cohort characteristics and screening results for the 274 samples included in the current study
|
| |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Norwegian |
|
| Australian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| CRC |
|
| Other cancers |
|
| Only adenomas |
|
| Multiple primary cancers |
|
|
| |
| Positive |
|
| Negative |
|
|
| |
| MSS |
|
| MSI‐L |
|
| MSI‐H |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data missing for six patients.
Data missing for three patients.
Revised Bethesda Guidelines (BG) positive.
Only available for the Norwegian patients. Data missing for 203 patients.
Data available for 68 Norwegian and 71 Australian samples. Data missing for 135 patients.
List of variants identified in LS screened MMR genes (MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6) and other MMR genes (EXO1, POLD1, RFC1, and RPA1)
| Gene | Hansen et al. (Hansen et al., | Reference sequence | DNA change | AA change | Domain |
|
| Classification | Type | Sample ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| NM_000249.3 | c.514G > A | p.Glu172Lys | NR | NR | VUS | Missense | 250 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Missense |
| ||
|
|
| NM_000249.3 | c.2103 + 1G>T | N/A | rs267607888 | N/A | Pathogenic | Missense |
| |
|
| NM_000249.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| MSH2 |
| NM_000251.2 | c.138C > G | p.His46Gln | rs33946261 | 0.0003619 | Likely Pathogenic | Missense |
| |
| MSH2 |
| NM_000251.2 | c.1045C > G | p.Pro349Ala | rs267607939 | 0.00009148 | Likely Pathogenic | Missense |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.001187 |
| Missense |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Missense |
| ||
|
|
|
|
| rs63750909 | 0.00003186 |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.001165 |
| Missense |
| ||
|
|
| NM_000179.2 | c.1282A > G | p.Lys428Glu | rs761822293 | 0.000003979 | VUS | Missense |
| |
|
|
| NM_000179.2 | c.2079dup | p.Cys694Metfs*4 | rs267608083 | NR | Pathogenic |
|
| |
|
|
| NM_000179.2 | c.3261 dup | p.Phe1088Leufs*5 | rs748452299 | 0.0018 | Pathogenic |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Missense |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| rs757677420 | 0.00000292 | VUS |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Missense |
| |
|
|
| c.1558insG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Missense |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Missense |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Missense |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Missense |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Missense |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Missense |
| |
| MLH3 |
| NM_001040108.1 | c.885del | p.His296Thrfs*12 | NR | N/A | VUS |
|
|
Reported here are the gene symbol, Refseq reference sequence, DNA and amino acid (AA) change, protein domain, the rs ID of the variant if known, then gnomad allele frequency and the classification according to the ACMG 2015 guidelines (Richards et al., 2015).
Not reported (NR) ‐ previously unreported variant.
Variant previously identified in Hansen et al. (2017).