Literature DB >> 31296485

Performance of Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided and Systematic Biopsy of the Prostate in Biopsy-naïve Patients and Patients with Prior Biopsies.

Felix Preisser1, Lena Theissen2, Mike Wenzel2, Clara Humke2, Boris Bodelle3, Jens Köllermann4, Luis Kluth2, Severine Banek2, Andreas Becker2, Frederik Roos2, Felix K-H Chun2, Philipp Mandel2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As recent prospective studies showed targeted biopsies (TBs) to be superior to systematic biopsies (SBs), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is gaining wider acceptance in the diagnostic setup of prostate cancer (PCa).
OBJECTIVE: To examine the performance of MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided TB in combination with SB in the detection of PCa in patients with and without prior biopsy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 219 men undergoing combined transrectal TB and 12-core SB from February 2014 to November 2018 were analysed. For all patients showing a suspicion of PCa in multiparametric MRI, TB was performed using fusion imaging with real-time virtual sonography. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Cancer detection rates (CDRs) and significant CDRs for TB, SB, and TB+SB were analysed. Further stratification was performed for a number of previous biopsy sessions and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score. Significant PCa was defined as any PCa with Gleason score ≥3+4. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of all, 141 patients were biopsy naïve, while 78 patients had at least one prior biopsy. Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level prior to biopsy was 8.4ng/ml (interquartile range 5.5-11.8ng/ml). The overall CDR was 63.5% (139/219), while the PI-RADS-dependent CDRs for the combination of TB+SB were 29.1%, 67.7%, and 86.2% for patients with PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Looking at TB or SB alone, CDRs were 55.7% and 57.5%. The overall CDR for significant PCa was 51.6%. (18.2%, 50.5%, and 81.5% for PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5, respectively). CDRs were significantly higher for biopsy-naïve patients (65.2% vs 67.4% vs 71.6% for TB vs SB vs TB+SB) than for patients with one previous negative biopsy (38.2% vs 43.6% vs 50.9% for TB vs SB vs TB+SB; all p<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Multiparametric MRI can raise the CDR in patients with and without biopsies performed earlier. With higher PI-RADS lesions, the risk of harbouring PCa increases. Combining TB with SB further improved the diagnostic accuracy in biopsy-naïve patients and after one previous negative biopsy. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before prostate biopsy increases cancer detection rates in biopsy-naïve patients and patients with a previous negative biopsy. The combination of targeted biopsy with systematic biopsy improved the diagnostic accuracy in biopsy-naïve patients and after one previous negative biopsy.
Copyright © 2019 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy naïve; Magnetic resonance imaging; Systematic biopsy; Targeted biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31296485     DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Focus        ISSN: 2405-4569


  6 in total

1.  Full functional-length urethral sphincter- and neurovascular bundle preservation improves long-term continence rates after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Felix K H Chun; Philipp Mandel; Benedikt Hoeh; Jan L Hohenhorst; Mike Wenzel; Clara Humke; Felix Preisser; Clarissa Wittler; Marie Brand; Jens Köllermann; Thomas Steuber; Markus Graefen; Derya Tilki; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Andreas Becker; Luis A Kluth
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-04-22

2.  Evidence-based guideline recommendations on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer: A Cancer Care Ontario updated clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Masoom A Haider; Judy Brown; Jospeh L K Chin; Nauthan Perlis; Nicola Schieda; Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates between magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in patients with PSA ≥4 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai Zhu; Zhiqiang Qin; Jianxin Xue; Chenkui Miao; Ye Tian; Shouyong Liu; Shenhao Zhu; Qi Gu; Chao Hou; Aiming Xu; Jie Yang; Zengjun Wang
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

4.  Systematic biopsy should not be omitted in the era of combined magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  Branimir Lodeta; Vladimir Trkulja; Georg Kolroser-Sarmiento; Danijel Jozipovic; Aigul Salmhofer; Herbert Augustin
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Systematic sampling during MRI-US fusion prostate biopsy can overcome errors of targeting-prospective single center experience after 300 cases in first biopsy setting.

Authors:  Emanuel Cata; Iulia Andras; Matteo Ferro; Pierre Kadula; Daniel Leucuta; Gennaro Musi; Deliu-Victor Matei; Ottavio De Cobelli; Attila Tamas-Szora; Cosmin Caraiani; Andrei Lebovici; Flavia Epure; Maria Bungardean; Radu-Tudor Coman; Nicolae Crisan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

6.  Multiparametric MRI may Help to Identify Patients With Prostate Cancer in a Contemporary Cohort of Patients With Clinical Bladder Outlet Obstruction Scheduled for Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP).

Authors:  Mike Wenzel; Maria N Welte; Lina Grossmann; Felix Preisser; Lena H Theissen; Clara Humke; Marina Deuker; Simon Bernatz; Philipp Gild; Sascha Ahyai; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Boris Bodelle; Luis A Kluth; Felix K H Chun; Philipp Mandel; Andreas Becker
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-02-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.