Literature DB >> 31296136

The load-velocity profiles of three upper-body pushing exercises in men and women.

Amador García-Ramos1,2, Dejan Suzovic3, Alejandro Pérez-Castilla1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the differences in the load-velocity profile between three upper-body pushing exercises in men and women. The load-velocity profiles (from 20% to 100% of the one-repetition maximum [1RM] in 5% increments) of 24 sport sciences students (12 men) were randomly tested during the horizontal bench press (HBP), inclined bench press (IBP) and seated military press (SMP) exercises. The 1RM was higher for the HBP (men: 94.2 ± 14.6 kg; women: 45.4 ± 10.1 kg), followed by the IBP (men: 87.7 ± 11.6 kg; women: 41.6 ± 6.6 kg), and finally the SMP (men: 67.4 ± 7.8 kg; women: 37.3 ± 6.3 kg). The mean test velocity (i.e., averaged velocity of all loads) and the slope of the load-velocity profile were significantly different between exercises (SMP > IBP > HBP) and sexes (men > women). The correlations between the exercises were very high for the individual 1RM values (r range = 0.714-0.982), but lower correlations were observed for the mean test velocity (r range = 0.237-0.766) slope of the load-velocity profile (r range = 0.018-0.721), and velocity of the 1RM (r range = 0.004-0.446). These results confirm that men present higher velocities at low relative loads (i.e., %1RM) compared to women during upper-body pushing exercises.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bench press; linear position transducer; military press; velocity-based training

Year:  2019        PMID: 31296136     DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2019.1597155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Biomech        ISSN: 1476-3141            Impact factor:   2.832


  7 in total

1.  Analysis of the Load-Velocity Relationship in Deadlift Exercise.

Authors:  Alejandro Benavides-Ubric; David M Díez-Fernández; Manuel A Rodríguez-Pérez; Manuel Ortega-Becerra; Fernando Pareja-Blanco
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Bar Load-Velocity Profile of Full Squat and Bench Press Exercises in Young Recreational Athletes.

Authors:  Jairo Alejandro Fernandez Ortega; Dario Mendoza Romero; Hugo Sarmento; Laura Prieto Mondragón
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 3.  Toward a New Paradigm in Resistance Training by Means of Velocity Monitoring: A Critical and Challenging Narrative.

Authors:  Juan José González-Badillo; Luis Sánchez-Medina; Juan Ribas-Serna; David Rodríguez-Rosell
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-09-16

4.  Concurrent and Predictive Validity of an Exercise-Specific Scale for the Perception of Velocity in the Back Squat.

Authors:  Ruggero Romagnoli; Sergio Civitella; Carlo Minganti; Maria Francesca Piacentini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-11       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  A comprehensive analysis of the velocity-based method in the shoulder press exercise: stability of the load-velocity relationship and sticking region parameters.

Authors:  Alejandro Hernández-Belmonte; Alejandro Martínez-Cava; Ricardo Morán-Navarro; Javier Courel-Ibáñez; Jesús G Pallarés
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.806

6.  Movement velocity can be used to estimate the relative load during the bench press and leg press exercises in older women.

Authors:  Pablo Jorge Marcos-Pardo; Jorge Miguel González-Hernández; Amador García-Ramos; Abraham López-Vivancos; Pedro Jiménez-Reyes
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Group versus Individualised Minimum Velocity Thresholds in the Prediction of Maximal Strength in Trained Female Athletes.

Authors:  Elias J G Caven; Tom J E Bryan; Amelia F Dingley; Benjamin Drury; Amador Garcia-Ramos; Alejandro Perez-Castilla; Jorge Arede; John F T Fernandes
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.