Literature DB >> 31293064

Objective vs self-report assessment of height, weight and body mass index: Relationships with adiposity, aerobic fitness and physical activity.

Oliver W A Wilson1, Christopher M Bopp1, Zack Papalia1, Melissa Bopp1.   

Abstract

Researchers, policymakers and clinicians commonly use height and weight to determine body mass index (BMI) and classify weight status. Self-report measures are widely used but often result in misreported height and weight and, consequentially, underestimation of BMI and-potentially-weight status misclassification. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in objective and self-reported height, weight and BMI values and to find whether discordance is associated with other anthropometric measures, fitness and physical activity. Data were collected from college students through: (a) a pre-consultation online questionnaire where participants self-reported gender, height and weight; (b) an objective fitness assessment that assessed height, weight, body fat percentage, abdominal girth and predicted aerobic fitness; and (c) a post-assessment electronic survey that assessed physical activity. Parametric and non-parametric analyses examined differences between groups. Objective and self-reported height and weight data were collected from 1061 participants, 224 of whom also provided physical activity data. Women significantly under-reported weight (P = .003, η2 = 0.02), and both genders over-reported height (P < .001, η2 ≥ 0.07), resulting in a significant difference between BMIs calculated using the different measures (P < .001, η2 ≥ 0.07) and the weight status misclassification of ~15% of participants. Significant differences were found in anthropometrics, fitness and physical activity based on reporting differences for weight (P ≤ .015) and BMI (P ≤ .015). Students demonstrated a tendency to under-report weight and over-report height, resulting in weight status misclassification. Those who under-reported weight tended to be in poorer health as indicated by lower aerobic fitness and higher abdominal girth and body fat percentage in particular. Further research is required to establish the link between under-reporting weight and over-reporting physical activity.
© 2019 World Obesity Federation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body composition; body mass index; exercise; obesity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31293064     DOI: 10.1111/cob.12331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obes        ISSN: 1758-8103


  5 in total

1.  Trends in obesity across Canada from 2005 to 2018: a consecutive cross-sectional population-based study.

Authors:  Ellina Lytvyak; Sebastian Straube; Renuca Modi; Karen K Lee
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2022-05-24

2.  Changes in Health Behaviors and Outcomes following Graduation from Higher Education.

Authors:  Oliver W A Wilson; Peter J Matthews; Michele Duffey; Zack Papalia; Melissa Bopp
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-02-01

3.  Does secure base script knowledge mediate associations between observed parental caregiving during childhood and adult romantic relationship quality and health?

Authors:  Or Dagan; Renate S M Buisman; Marissa D Nivison; Theodore E A Waters; Brian E Vaughn; Kelly K Bost; Maria E Bleil; Deborah Lowe Vandell; Cathryn Booth-LaForce; Glenn I Roisman
Journal:  Attach Hum Dev       Date:  2020-10-27

4.  The Motor Function Evaluation of College Students' Physical Activity State From the Perspective of Educational Psychology.

Authors:  Sha Ge; Chao Song; Wanxiang Yao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-15

5.  Promoting exercise behavior and cardiorespiratory fitness among college students based on the motivation theory.

Authors:  Bo Li; Shanshan Han; Shuqiao Meng; Jaewoo Lee; Jie Cheng; Yang Liu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.