Literature DB >> 15721561

Fish otolith mass asymmetry: morphometry and influence on acoustic functionality.

D V Lychakov1, Y T Rebane.   

Abstract

The role of the fish otolith mass asymmetry in acoustic functionality is studied. The saccular, lagenar and utricular otoliths are weighted in two species of the Black Sea rays, 15 species of the Black Sea teleost fish and guppy fish. The dimensionless otolith mass asymmetry chi is calculated as ratio of the difference between masses of the right and left paired otoliths to average otolith mass. In the most fish studied the otolith mass asymmetry is within the range of -0.2 < chi < +0.2 (< 20%). We do not find specific fish species with extremely large or extremely small otolith asymmetry. The large otoliths do not belong solely to any particular side, left or right. The heavier otoliths of different otolithic organs can be located in different labyrinths. No relationship has been found between the magnitude of the otolith mass asymmetry and the length (mass, age) of the animal. The suggested fluctuation model of the otolith growth can interpret these results. The model supposes that the otolith growth rate varies slightly hither and thither during lifetime of the individual fish. Therefore, the sign of the relative otolith mass asymmetry can change several times in the process of the individual fish growth but within the range outlined above. Mathematical modeling shows that acoustic functionality (sensitivity, temporal processing, sound localization) of the fish can be disturbed by the otolith mass asymmetry. But this is valid only for the fish with largest otolith masses, characteristic of the bottom and littoral fish, and with highest otolith asymmetry. For most fish the values of otolith mass asymmetry is well below critical values. Thus, the most fish get around the troubles related to the otolith mass asymmetry. We suggest that a specific physicochemical mechanism of the paired otolith growth that maintains the otolith mass asymmetry at the lowest possible level should exist. However, the principle and details of this mechanism are still far from being understood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15721561     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  11 in total

1.  Dispersal without errors: symmetrical ears tune into the right frequency for survival.

Authors:  Monica Gagliano; Martial Depczynski; Stephen D Simpson; James A Y Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Auditory evoked potentials of the plainfin midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus): implications for directional hearing.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Ruiyu Zeng; Joseph A Sisneros
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Morphology of the utricular otolith organ in the toadfish, Opsanus tau.

Authors:  Richard Boyle; Reza Ehsanian; Alireza Mofrad; Yekaterina Popova; Joseph Varelas
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 4.  On the role of the central nervous system in regulating the mineralisation of inner-ear otoliths of fish.

Authors:  Ralf H Anken
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 3.356

5.  Acoustic Properties of the Otolith of the Large Yellow Croaker Larimichthys crocea (Perciformes: Sciaenidae).

Authors:  Xin-Hai Zhang; Yi Tao; Yang-Liang Zhou; Li-Guo Tang; Min Liu; Xiao-Mei Xu
Journal:  Zool Stud       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Ocean acidification alters the otoliths of a pantropical fish species with implications for sensory function.

Authors:  Sean Bignami; Ian C Enochs; Derek P Manzello; Su Sponaugle; Robert K Cowen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Perception of threshold-level whole-body motion during mechanical mastoid vibration.

Authors:  Rakshatha Kabbaligere; Charles S Layne; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  Ocean acidification effects on fish hearing.

Authors:  C A Radford; S P Collins; P L Munday; D Parsons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  In-situ visualization of sound-induced otolith motion using hard X-ray phase contrast imaging.

Authors:  Tanja Schulz-Mirbach; Margie Olbinado; Alexander Rack; Alberto Mittone; Alberto Bravin; Roland R Melzer; Friedrich Ladich; Martin Heß
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  High prevalence of vaterite in sagittal otoliths causes hearing impairment in farmed fish.

Authors:  T Reimer; T Dempster; F Warren-Myers; A J Jensen; S E Swearer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.