Maria B Kennedy1, Inam Haq2, Gordon Ferns1, Sian E Williams3, Michael Okorie1. 1. Department of Medical Education, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK. 2. Sydney Medical Programme, University of Sydney, Australia. 3. Health Psychology, School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.
Abstract
AIMS: To investigate medical students' perspectives on the influence of their undergraduate course and the UK prescribing safety assessment (PSA) on the acquisition of practical prescribing skills. METHODS: An online questionnaire comprising multiple choice and open-ended questions was available to UK medical students in years 3, 4 and 5. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were completed. RESULTS: In total, 1023 medical students from 25 UK medical schools responded: 22% (3rd year), 37% (4th year) and 41% (final year). A minority of medical students believed that their medical course prepared them sufficiently for practical prescribing (36.4%, n = 372, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 32-41%), 52.6%, of students thought that practical prescribing should be introduced into the curriculum earlier (n = 538, CI = 48-57%), and 73.7% reported that a more consistent approach to the teaching and learning of practical prescribing might be beneficial (n = 754, CI = 71-77%). An awareness of the national PSA was high (86.5%, n = 885), particularly amongst final year students (98.3%, n = 413, CI = 97-100%); 67.4% of all students (n = 690, CI = 64-71%) and 72.1% (n = 303) of final year students perceived that the PSA will improve or had improved their practical prescribing skills. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of medical students perceive that their undergraduate course does not adequately prepare them for practical prescribing. Many believe that there is some merit in introducing practical prescribing teaching earlier in the curriculum and medical schools adopting a more consistent approach. Among medical students, the PSA is thought to have a positive influence on prescribing skills learning. These data might be useful in developing a programme of study dedicated to practical prescribing.
AIMS: To investigate medical students' perspectives on the influence of their undergraduate course and the UK prescribing safety assessment (PSA) on the acquisition of practical prescribing skills. METHODS: An online questionnaire comprising multiple choice and open-ended questions was available to UK medical students in years 3, 4 and 5. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were completed. RESULTS: In total, 1023 medical students from 25 UK medical schools responded: 22% (3rd year), 37% (4th year) and 41% (final year). A minority of medical students believed that their medical course prepared them sufficiently for practical prescribing (36.4%, n = 372, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 32-41%), 52.6%, of students thought that practical prescribing should be introduced into the curriculum earlier (n = 538, CI = 48-57%), and 73.7% reported that a more consistent approach to the teaching and learning of practical prescribing might be beneficial (n = 754, CI = 71-77%). An awareness of the national PSA was high (86.5%, n = 885), particularly amongst final year students (98.3%, n = 413, CI = 97-100%); 67.4% of all students (n = 690, CI = 64-71%) and 72.1% (n = 303) of final year students perceived that the PSA will improve or had improved their practical prescribing skills. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of medical students perceive that their undergraduate course does not adequately prepare them for practical prescribing. Many believe that there is some merit in introducing practical prescribing teaching earlier in the curriculum and medical schools adopting a more consistent approach. Among medical students, the PSA is thought to have a positive influence on prescribing skills learning. These data might be useful in developing a programme of study dedicated to practical prescribing.
Authors: Gill Morrow; Neil Johnson; Bryan Burford; Charlotte Rothwell; John Spencer; Ed Peile; Carol Davies; Maggie Allen; Beate Baldauf; Jill Morrison; Jan Illing Journal: Med Teach Date: 2012 Impact factor: 3.650
Authors: Sheena Elizabeth Geoghegan; Eric Clarke; Dara Byrne; Dermot Power; Daragh Moneley; Judith Strawbridge; David James Williams Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: David J Brinkman; Jelle Tichelaar; Sanne Graaf; René H J Otten; Milan C Richir; Michiel A van Agtmael Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Friederike Holderried; Anne Herrmann-Werner; Moritz Mahling; Martin Holderried; Reimer Riessen; Stephan Zipfel; Nora Celebi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-26 Impact factor: 3.240