Mary E Rinella1, Frank Tacke2, Arun J Sanyal3, Quentin M Anstee4. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. 2. Department of Hepatology/Gastroenterology, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA. 4. Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a global public health concern. Its natural history, the development of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis, is highly variable, prone to endogenous (e.g., genetics, microbiota) and exogenous (e.g., nutrition, alcohol, physical activity) disease modifiers, and can fluctuate over time. The complexity of its pathophysiology is reflected by the multitude of pharmacological targets in development. NASH clinical trials have provided valuable insight that is applicable to future trial design. Endpoints for NASH have evolved over the past decade and will continue to be refined. Currently accepted endpoints for conditional approval include resolution of NASH without worsening of fibrosis and/or improvement in fibrosis without worsening of NASH by standardized evaluation of paired liver histology. In pediatric NASH, practical obstacles, pubertal hormonal changes, and stringent safety requirements mandate adaptations in trial design. In adult patients with NASH-related cirrhosis, clinical events (e.g. decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, transplantation, death) are more prevalent and thereby are viable primary endpoints. Consideration of the natural fluctuation of disease, the clinical implication of the chosen primary endpoint, and factors that may affect placebo response will facilitate an accurate determination of efficacy of emerging therapeutics for NASH. Conclusion: The June 2018 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and European Association for the Study of the Liver joint workshop on NAFLD endpoints summarized important findings from ongoing and completed trials, defined the scientific evidence supporting distinct endpoints, and provided guidance for future trial design.
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a global public health concern. Its natural history, the development of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis, is highly variable, prone to endogenous (e.g., genetics, microbiota) and exogenous (e.g., nutrition, alcohol, physical activity) disease modifiers, and can fluctuate over time. The complexity of its pathophysiology is reflected by the multitude of pharmacological targets in development. NASH clinical trials have provided valuable insight that is applicable to future trial design. Endpoints for NASH have evolved over the past decade and will continue to be refined. Currently accepted endpoints for conditional approval include resolution of NASH without worsening of fibrosis and/or improvement in fibrosis without worsening of NASH by standardized evaluation of paired liver histology. In pediatric NASH, practical obstacles, pubertal hormonal changes, and stringent safety requirements mandate adaptations in trial design. In adult patients with NASH-related cirrhosis, clinical events (e.g. decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, transplantation, death) are more prevalent and thereby are viable primary endpoints. Consideration of the natural fluctuation of disease, the clinical implication of the chosen primary endpoint, and factors that may affect placebo response will facilitate an accurate determination of efficacy of emerging therapeutics for NASH. Conclusion: The June 2018 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and European Association for the Study of the Liver joint workshop on NAFLD endpoints summarized important findings from ongoing and completed trials, defined the scientific evidence supporting distinct endpoints, and provided guidance for future trial design.
Authors: Aldo J Montano-Loza; Jessica R Allegretti; Angela Cheung; Maryam Ebadi; David Jones; Nanda Kerkar; Cynthia Levy; Sumera Rizvi; John M Vierling; Fernando Alvarez; Wayne Bai; Susan Gilmour; Aliya Gulamhusein; Orlee Guttman; Bettina E Hansen; Sonya MacParland; Andrew Mason; Fernanda Onofrio; Pere Santamaria; Ashley Stueck; Mark Swain; Catherine Vincent; Amanda Ricciuto; Gideon Hirschfield Journal: Can Liver J Date: 2021-11-11
Authors: Sven Francque; Gyongyi Szabo; Manal F Abdelmalek; Christopher D Byrne; Kenneth Cusi; Jean-François Dufour; Michael Roden; Frank Sacks; Frank Tacke Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2020-10-22 Impact factor: 46.802
Authors: Jonathan G Stine; Nagambika Munaganuru; Abbey Barnard; Jennifer L Wang; Kellee Kaulback; Curtis K Argo; Siddarth Singh; Kathryn J Fowler; Claude B Sirlin; Rohit Loomba Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2020-08-31 Impact factor: 11.382