| Literature DB >> 35784533 |
Tian Lan1,2,3,4, Tonghao Xu1,2,3,4, Yanfang Fu1,2,3,4, Shuo Jiang1,2,3,4, Xiaolin Liang1,2,3,4, Ze Yu1,2,3,4, Linyu Pan1,2,3,4, Xianglu Rong1,2,3,4, Jiao Guo1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has become a major cause of liver transplantation and liver-associated death. Targeting the gut-liver axis is a potential therapy for NASH. The Fufang Zhenzhu Tiaozhi (FTZ) capsule, a traditional Chinese medicine commonly used in clinical practice, has recently emerged as a promising drug candidate for metabolic diseases such as NASH. The present study aimed to investigate whether FTZ exerts an anti-NASH effect by targeting the gut-liver axis. Mice were fed with a high-fat diet (HFD) for 20 weeks to induce NASH. HFD-fed mice were daily intragastrically administrated with FTZ at 10 weeks after tbe initiation of HFD feeding. The mRNA levels of genes associated with the intestinal tight junction, lipid metabolism, and inflammation were determined by the q-PCR assay. Hepatic pathology was evaluated by H&E staining. The gut microbiota was analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. FTZ attenuated HFD-induced obesity, insulin resistance, and hepatic steatosis in mice. FTZ treatment decreased the elevated levels of serum aminotransferases and liver triglyceride in NASH mice. Furthermore, FTZ treatment reduced hepatic inflammatory cell infiltration and fibrosis in mice. In addition, FTZ attenuated the intestinal inflammatory response and improved intestinal barrier function. Mechanistically, FTZ-treated mice showed a different gut microbiota composition compared with that in HFD-fed mice. Finally, we identified eight differential metabolites that may contribute to the improvement of NASH with FTZ treatment. In summary, FTZ ameliorates NASH by inhibiting gut inflammation, improving intestinal barrier function, and modulating intestinal microbiota composition.Entities:
Keywords: NASH; gut–liver axis; intestinal barrier; intestinal microbiota; traditional Chinese medicine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35784533 PMCID: PMC9243428 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.864703
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 6.055
Figure 1Experimental methods using FTZ and the effects of FTZ on weight gain, obesity, and insulin sensitivity in HFD-induced obese mice. (A) The experimental approach. (B) Fasting body weight of mice at week 20 (n=8-10). (C) Fat-to-body weight ratio (n=8). (D) Fasting insulin (n=8). (E, F) The IPGTT and IPITT assays were performed to evaluate the insulin sensitivity of mice in the indicated groups treated with NCD, HFD, or FTZ (n=7-10). Data are represented as means ± SEM. # indicates a significant difference between the NCD group and the HFD group (t-test); * indicates a significant difference between the FTZ (600 mg/kg)/FTZ (1,200 mg/kg)/ATV (10 mg/kg) group and the HFD group (one-way ANOVA). ## P < 0.01 versus NCD mice; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 versus mice fed by HFD. ns indicates no significance.
Figure 2Effects of FTZ on hepatic steatosis and lipotoxicity in mice. (A) Representative macroscopic images of the livers of NCD, HFD, FTZ, and ATV mice. (B) Representative images of H&E and oil red O staining of liver sections. (C) NAS score in the indicated groups (n=6-7). (D) Liver weight (n=8). (E) Liver TG content (n=8). (F) Serum ALT and AST levels of the mice in the indicated groups (n=8). Data are represented as means ± SEM. # indicates a significant difference between the NCD group and the HFD group (t-test); * indicates a significant difference between the FTZ (600 mg/kg)/FTZ (1,200 mg/kg)/ATV (10 mg/kg) group and the HFD group (one-way ANOVA). ## P < 0.01 versus NCD mice; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 versus mice fed by HFD. ns indicates no significance.
Figure 3Effects of FTZ on liver lipid metabolism in mice. (A–C) The mRNA expression levels of genes associated with fatty acid synthesis, transport, lipolysis, and β-oxidation (n=6-7). (D) The expression of PPAR-γ, ATGL, and GAPDH was analyzed by Western blotting. GAPDH served as a loading control (n=3). Data are represented as means ± SEM. # indicates a significant difference between the NCD group and the HFD group (t-test); * indicates a significant difference between the FTZ (600 mg/kg)/FTZ (1,200 mg/kg)/ATV (10 mg/kg) group and the HFD group (one-way ANOVA). # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01 versus NCD mice; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 versus mice fed by HFD. ns indicates no significance.
Figure 4Effects of FTZ on metabolic inflammation and fibrosis in the livers of mice. (A) Representative images showing PSR and immunohistochemical staining of CD68 staining in the livers of the indicated mice (n=6). (B) Relative mRNA levels of inflammatory genes in the livers of the indicated mice (n=7–8). (C) Relative mRNA levels of profibrotic genes in the livers of the indicated mice (n=7-8). (D) The expression of CD68, TLR-4, and β-actin was analyzed by Western blotting. β-actin served as a loading control (n=3). (E) The expression of α-SMA, p-Smad3, Smad2/3, and β-actin was analyzed by Western blotting. β-actin served as a loading control (n=3). Data are represented as means ± SEM. # indicates a significant difference between the NCD group and the HFD group (t-test); * indicates a significant difference between the FTZ (600 mg/kg)/FTZ (1,200mg/kg)/ATV (10 mg/kg) group and the HFD group (one-way ANOVA). ## P < 0.01 versus NCD mice; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 versus mice fed by HFD. ns indicates no significance.
Figure 5Effects of FTZ on intestinal mucosal barrier and inflammation in mice. (A) Representative images of H&E staining of ileum sections. (B) Relative mRNA levels of ileum tight junction molecule genes of the indicated mice (n=7). (C) The expression of ZO-1, E-cadherin, and GAPDH was analyzed by Western blotting. GAPDH served as a loading control (n=3). (D) Relative mRNA levels of ileum inflammation genes of mice in the indicated group (n=7). Data are represented as means ± SEM. # indicates a significant difference between the NCD group and the HFD group (t-test); * indicates a significant difference between the FTZ (600 mg/kg)/FTZ (1,200 mg/kg)/ATV (10 mg/kg) group and the HFD group (one-way ANOVA). ## P < 0.01 versus NCD mice; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 versus mice fed by HFD. ns indicates no significance.
Figure 6Effects of FTZ on the intestinal flora compartment of mice. (A) PCA score plot (n=5). (B) Average class distribution of gut microbiomes. (C) The heat map (clustered at class level) showing that the flora was significantly altered by HFD and FTZ treatment compared to NCD (n=5). (D) The comparison of the taxonomic abundance of the indicated groups (n=5). Data are represented as means ± SEM. # indicates a significant difference between the NCD group and the HFD group (t-test); * indicates a significant difference between the FTZ (600 mg/kg)/FTZ (1,200 mg/kg) group and the HFD group (one-way ANOVA). # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01 versus NCD mice; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 versus mice fed by HFD. ns indicates no significance.
Figure 7Effects of FTZ on the metabolite composition of the intestinal flora of mice. (A) OPLS-DA 2D score chart and permutation test (n=3). (B) Relative abundance statistics for the median values of each metabolite in each group of samples. (C) Z-score heat map for the overall metabolite profile (n=3).
Figure 8Effects of FTZ on the potential biomarkers of intestinal metabolites in mice. (A) Volcano map based on OPLS-DA model results (VIP) > 1. (B) Volcano plot based on a one-dimensional test with the threshold set as follows: 1) P < 0.05 (t-test or Mann–Whitney U test); 2) absolute value of log2FC >1. (C) Venn diagram and the corresponding scores of the differential metabolites based on the data from the OPLS-DA model and one-dimensional test. (D) Z-score heat map of potential biomarkers (n=3). (E) Results of the pathway enrichment analysis of differential metabolites using selected SMPDB libraries (hypergeometric test). (F–J) Unidimensional statistical analysis of violin plots for the top 8 differential metabolites in terms of p-value (t-test or Wilcox. test; n=3).
Figure 9FTZ attenuated HFD-induced hepatic steatosis, inflammatory responses, and fibrosis in mice. FTZ reduces lipotoxicity by regulating hepatic lipid synthesis, transport, and catabolism. Moreover, FTZ alleviates NASH and progressive liver fibrosis by inhibiting hepatic inflammation, stellate cell activation, and collagen deposition. These protective effects are achieved by modulating tight junctions, restoring intestinal barrier function, and improving the dysregulation of intestinal flora and its metabolites in mice.