Kirsten M M Beyer1, Purushottam W Laud2, Yuhong Zhou1, Ann B Nattinger3. 1. Division of Epidemiology, Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 2. Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 3. Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer contributes substantially to the life expectancy gap between US blacks and whites, and racial cancer disparities remain stubborn to eradicate. Disparities vary geographically, suggesting that they are not inevitable. METHODS: The authors examined the relationship between housing discrimination and the size of cancer disparities across large US metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs). MSA-level cancer disparities were measured using data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mortgage discrimination for each MSA was estimated using the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act database, and MSA racial segregation was determined using US Census data. Patterns of housing discrimination and cancer disparities were mapped, and the associations between these place-based factors and cancer disparities across MSAs were measured. RESULTS: Black-to-white cancer mortality disparities (rate ratios) varied geographically, ranging from 1.50 to 0.86; 88% of mortality ratios were >1, indicating higher mortality for blacks. In areas with greater mortgage discrimination, the gap between black and white cancer mortality rates was larger (correlation coefficient [r] = 0.32; P = .001). This relationship persisted in sex-specific analyses (males, r = 0.37; P < .001; females, r = 0.23; P = .02) and in models controlling for confounders. In contrast, segregation was inconsistently associated with disparities. Adjusting for incidence disparities attenuated, but did not eliminate, the correlation between mortgage discrimination and mortality disparities (r = 0.22-0.24), suggesting that cancer incidence and survival each account for part of the mortality disparity. CONCLUSIONS: Mortgage discrimination is associated with larger black-to-white cancer mortality disparities. Some areas are exceptions to this trend. Examination of these exceptions and of policies related to housing discrimination may offer novel strategies for explaining and eliminating cancer disparities.
BACKGROUND:Cancer contributes substantially to the life expectancy gap between US blacks and whites, and racial cancer disparities remain stubborn to eradicate. Disparities vary geographically, suggesting that they are not inevitable. METHODS: The authors examined the relationship between housing discrimination and the size of cancer disparities across large US metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs). MSA-level cancer disparities were measured using data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mortgage discrimination for each MSA was estimated using the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act database, and MSA racial segregation was determined using US Census data. Patterns of housing discrimination and cancer disparities were mapped, and the associations between these place-based factors and cancer disparities across MSAs were measured. RESULTS: Black-to-white cancer mortality disparities (rate ratios) varied geographically, ranging from 1.50 to 0.86; 88% of mortality ratios were >1, indicating higher mortality for blacks. In areas with greater mortgage discrimination, the gap between black and white cancer mortality rates was larger (correlation coefficient [r] = 0.32; P = .001). This relationship persisted in sex-specific analyses (males, r = 0.37; P < .001; females, r = 0.23; P = .02) and in models controlling for confounders. In contrast, segregation was inconsistently associated with disparities. Adjusting for incidence disparities attenuated, but did not eliminate, the correlation between mortgage discrimination and mortality disparities (r = 0.22-0.24), suggesting that cancer incidence and survival each account for part of the mortality disparity. CONCLUSIONS: Mortgage discrimination is associated with larger black-to-white cancer mortality disparities. Some areas are exceptions to this trend. Examination of these exceptions and of policies related to housing discrimination may offer novel strategies for explaining and eliminating cancer disparities.
Authors: Candyce H Kroenke; Laura D Kubzansky; Eva S Schernhammer; Michelle D Holmes; Ichiro Kawachi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Maureen R Benjamins; Bijou R Hunt; Sarah M Raleigh; Jana L Hirschtick; Michelle M Hughes Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: David H Chae; Sean Clouston; Mark L Hatzenbuehler; Michael R Kramer; Hannah L F Cooper; Sacoby M Wilson; Seth I Stephens-Davidowitz; Robert S Gold; Bruce G Link Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jamaji C Nwanaji-Enwerem; Chandra L Jackson; Mary Ann Ottinger; Andres Cardenas; Katherine A James; Kristen M C Malecki; Jiu-Chiuan Chen; Andrew M Geller; Uchechi A Mitchell Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Kristen A Sorice; Carolyn Y Fang; Daniel Wiese; Angel Ortiz; Yuku Chen; Kevin A Henry; Shannon M Lynch Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2022-02-14 Impact factor: 4.711
Authors: Kirsten M M Beyer; Yuhong Zhou; Purushottam W Laud; Emily L McGinley; Tina W F Yen; Courtney Jankowski; Nicole Rademacher; Sima Namin; Jamila Kwarteng; Sara Beltrán Ponce; Ann B Nattinger Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: L Silvia Muñoz-Price; Ann B Nattinger; Frida Rivera; Ryan Hanson; Cameron G Gmehlin; Adriana Perez; Siddhartha Singh; Blake W Buchan; Nathan A Ledeboer; Liliana E Pezzin Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-09-01