Literature DB >> 27618817

Mood induction effects on motor sequence learning and stop signal reaction time.

Brian Greeley1,2, Rachael D Seidler3,4,5.   

Abstract

The neurobiological theory of positive affect proposes that positive mood states may benefit cognitive performance due to an increase of dopamine throughout the brain. However, the results of many positive affect studies are inconsistent; this may be due to individual differences. The relationship between dopamine and performance is not linear, but instead follows an inverted "U" shape. Given this, we hypothesized that individuals with high working memory capacity, a proxy measure for dopaminergic transmission, would not benefit from positive mood induction and in fact performance in dopamine-mediated tasks would decline. In contrast, we predicted that individuals with low working memory capacities would receive the most benefit after positive mood induction. Here, we explored the effect of positive affect on two dopamine-mediated tasks, an explicit serial reaction time sequence learning task and the stop signal task, predicting that an individual's performance is modulated not only by working memory capacity, but also on the type of mood. Improvements in explicit sequence learning from pre- to post-positive mood induction were associated with working memory capacity; performance declined in individuals with higher working memory capacities following positive mood induction, but improved in individuals with lower working memory capacities. This was not the case for negative or neutral mood induction. Moreover, there was no relationship between the change in stop signal reaction time with any of the mood inductions and individual differences in working memory capacity. These results provide partial support for the neurobiological theory of positive affect and highlight the importance of taking into account individual differences in working memory when examining the effects of positive mood induction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dopamine; Motor learning; Positive affect; Serial reaction time task; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27618817     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4764-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  56 in total

Review 1.  Central mechanisms of motor skill learning.

Authors:  Okihide Hikosaka; Kae Nakamura; Katsuyuki Sakai; Hiroyuki Nakahara
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  Distinct contribution of the cortico-striatal and cortico-cerebellar systems to motor skill learning.

Authors:  Julien Doyon; Virginia Penhune; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  Individual differences in emotion processing.

Authors:  Stephan Hamann; Turhan Canli
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Individual differences in working memory capacity predict action monitoring and the error-related negativity.

Authors:  A Eve Miller; Jason M Watson; David L Strayer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Striatal dopamine D₂/D₃ receptors mediate response inhibition and related activity in frontostriatal neural circuitry in humans.

Authors:  Dara G Ghahremani; Buyean Lee; Chelsea L Robertson; Golnaz Tabibnia; Andrew T Morgan; Natalie De Shetler; Amira K Brown; John R Monterosso; Adam R Aron; Mark A Mandelkern; Russell A Poldrack; Edythe D London
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Striatal D1- and D2-type dopamine receptors are linked to motor response inhibition in human subjects.

Authors:  Chelsea L Robertson; Kenji Ishibashi; Mark A Mandelkern; Amira K Brown; Dara G Ghahremani; Fred Sabb; Robert Bilder; Tyrone Cannon; Jacqueline Borg; Edythe D London
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection.

Authors:  G Rowe; J B Hirsh; A K Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Dopamine D4 receptor gene and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Yitzchak Frank; Robert G Pergolizzi; Mindy J Perilla
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.372

9.  Valence, arousal, and cognitive control: a voluntary task-switching study.

Authors:  Jelle Demanet; Baptist Liefooghe; Frederick Verbruggen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-24

10.  Dissociating Two Stages of Preparation in the Stop Signal Task Using fMRI.

Authors:  Andre Chevrier; Douglas Cheyne; Simon Graham; Russell Schachar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Combining Fluoxetine and rTMS in Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Camila Bonin Pinto; Leon Morales-Quezada; Polyana Vulcano de Toledo Piza; Dian Zeng; Faddi Ghassan Saleh Vélez; Isadora Santos Ferreira; Pedro Henrique Lucena; Dante Duarte; Fernanda Lopes; Mirret M El-Hagrassy; Luiz Vicente Rizzo; Erica C Camargo; David J Lin; Nicole Mazwi; Qing Mei Wang; Randie Black-Schaffer; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Working Memory Load and Negative Picture Processing: Neural and Behavioral Associations With Panic, Social Anxiety, and Positive Affect.

Authors:  Annmarie MacNamara; T Bryan Jackson; Jacklynn M Fitzgerald; Greg Hajcak; K Luan Phan
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2018-04-22

3.  Volitional control of individual neurons in the human brain.

Authors:  Kramay Patel; Chaim N Katz; Suneil K Kalia; Milos R Popovic; Taufik A Valiante
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 15.255

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.