Literature DB >> 31286190

[Status and perspectives of registry-based studies in German ophthalmology].

M Roth1, C Holtmann2, D Böhringer3, R P Finger4, N Eter5, B Seitz6, G Geerling2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Registry studies provide insights into real-life diagnostic and treatment data outside of clinical trials. Registry studies are interesting for quality management and explorative analyses can lead to the identification of possible risk or prognostically relevant factors and generate hypotheses. There are currently relatively few active registry studies in German ophthalmology. The aim of this survey was to collate the different infrastructure and in particular the potential hurdles in the establishment and performance of registry studies in German ophthalmology departments.
METHODS: An online questionnaire collected data on participation in registry studies in German ophthalmology departments between September and December 2018. The survey was addressed to all hospital management and medical staff involved in registry studies in German ophthalmology.
RESULTS: Out of 45 participants 18 were head of the department, the remaining 27 were consultants (15), medical specialists (2) and residents (10). According to the department head an average of 2.5 (2.0-3.5) employees per clinic participate in 2.0 (1.7-3.0) registry studies. The amount of reimbursement recommended by the hospital management differed significantly from the amount suggested by the staff (0.0 (0; 75) € (0-100) vs. 100.0 (50.0; 150.0) €; p = 0.0012). The most frequent hurdles to conducting a registry study were bureaucracy and limited human resources. Half of the surveyed centers profited from a separate study center and good clinical practice (GCP) courses for employees involved in studies were mandatory. A quarter of these centers received support from an IT department and/or a statistician.
CONCLUSION: Registry studies are an important instrument in ophthalmology research and their importance is increasing in Germany. An agreement on national standards would make the establishment of further registry studies easier.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; Multicenter study; Registry; Reimbursement; Study design

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31286190     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-019-0931-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  9 in total

1.  The British Ophthalmological Surveillance Unit: an evaluation of the first 3 years.

Authors:  B Foot; M Stanford; J Rahi; J Thompson
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Defining authorship for group studies.

Authors:  Thomas J Liesegang; Andrew P Schachat; Daniel M Albert
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  [Memorandum registry for health services research].

Authors:  D Müller; M Augustin; N Banik; W Baumann; K Bestehorn; J Kieschke; R Lefering; B Maier; S Mathis; S J Rustenbach; S Sauerland; S C Semler; J Stausberg; H Sturm; C Unger; E A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2010-09-24

Review 4.  Clinical Registries in Ophthalmology.

Authors:  Jeremy C K Tan; Alexander C Ferdi; Mark C Gillies; Stephanie L Watson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 5.  [What can and cannot be achieved by registries : Perspective of the registry working group of the German Network of Health Services Research].

Authors:  E A M Neugebauer; J Stausberg
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Trends in Corneal Transplantation from 2001 to 2016 in Germany: A Report of the DOG-Section Cornea and its Keratoplasty Registry.

Authors:  Elias Flockerzi; Philip Maier; Daniel Böhringer; Helga Reinshagen; Friedrich Kruse; Claus Cursiefen; Thomas Reinhard; Gerd Geerling; Necip Torun; Berthold Seitz
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 7.  [Registry-based research in ophthalmology].

Authors:  J Li; C Heinz; R P Finger
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  [The German keratomycosis registry : Initial results of a multicenter survey].

Authors:  M Roth; L Daas; A Renner-Wilde; N Cvetkova-Fischer; M Saeger; M Herwig-Carl; M Matthaei; A Fekete; V Kakkassery; G Walther; M von Lilienfeld-Toal; C Mertens; J Lenk; J Mehlan; C Fischer; M Fuest; S Kroll; W Bayoudh; A Viestenz; A Frings; C R MacKenzie; E M Messmer; B Seitz; O Kurzai; G Geerling
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Guidelines and recommendations for ensuring Good Epidemiological Practice (GEP): a guideline developed by the German Society for Epidemiology.

Authors:  Wolfgang Hoffmann; Ute Latza; Sebastian E Baumeister; Martin Brünger; Nina Buttmann-Schweiger; Juliane Hardt; Verena Hoffmann; André Karch; Adrian Richter; Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Irene Schmidtmann; Enno Swart; Neeltje van den Berg
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 8.082

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Childhood glaucoma registry in Germany: initial database, clinical care and research (pilot study).

Authors:  Fidan A Aghayeva; Alexander K Schuster; Heidi Diel; Panagiotis Chronopoulos; Felix M Wagner; Franz Grehn; Nina Pirlich; Susann Schweiger; Norbert Pfeiffer; Esther M Hoffmann
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-02-10

2.  [The Hamburg register for intravitreal injection therapies (QIVOM)].

Authors:  Christian Wolfram; Marc Schargus
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 1.059

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.