M J Passeri1, E H Baker1, I A Siddiqui1, M A Templin2, J B Martinie1, D Vrochides1, D A Iannitti1. 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, U.S.A. 2. Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC, U.S.A.
Abstract
Introduction: Total pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has historically been associated with substantial patient morbidity and mortality. Given advancements in perioperative and postoperative care, evaluation of the surgical treatment options for pancreatic adenocarcinoma should consider patient outcomes and long-term survival for total pancreatectomy compared with partial pancreatectomy. Methods: The U.S. National Cancer Database was queried for patients undergoing total pancreatectomy or partial pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma during 1998-2006. Demographics, tumour characteristics, operative outcomes, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, additional treatment, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared. Results: The database query returned 807 patients who underwent total pancreatectomy and 5840 who underwent partial pancreatectomy. More patients who underwent total pancreatectomy than a partial pancreatectomy had a margin-negative resection (p < 0.0001). Mortality and readmission rates were similar in the two groups, as was long-term survival on Kaplan-Meier curves (p = 0.377). A statistically significant difference in the rate of surgery only (without additional treatment) was observed for patients in the total pancreatectomy group (p = 0.0003). Conclusions: Although total compared with partial pancreatectomy was associated with a higher rate of margin-negative resection, median survival was not significantly different for patients undergoing either procedure. Patients who underwent total pancreatectomy were significantly less likely to receive adjuvant therapy.
Introduction: Total pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has historically been associated with substantial patient morbidity and mortality. Given advancements in perioperative and postoperative care, evaluation of the surgical treatment options for pancreatic adenocarcinoma should consider patient outcomes and long-term survival for total pancreatectomy compared with partial pancreatectomy. Methods: The U.S. National Cancer Database was queried for patients undergoing total pancreatectomy or partial pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma during 1998-2006. Demographics, tumour characteristics, operative outcomes, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, additional treatment, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared. Results: The database query returned 807 patients who underwent total pancreatectomy and 5840 who underwent partial pancreatectomy. More patients who underwent total pancreatectomy than a partial pancreatectomy had a margin-negative resection (p < 0.0001). Mortality and readmission rates were similar in the two groups, as was long-term survival on Kaplan-Meier curves (p = 0.377). A statistically significant difference in the rate of surgery only (without additional treatment) was observed for patients in the total pancreatectomy group (p = 0.0003). Conclusions: Although total compared with partial pancreatectomy was associated with a higher rate of margin-negative resection, median survival was not significantly different for patients undergoing either procedure. Patients who underwent total pancreatectomy were significantly less likely to receive adjuvant therapy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Pancreatectomy; databases; morbidity; mortality; pancreatic neoplasms; pancreaticoduodenectomy; postoperative care
Authors: M D Chandrasegaram; D Goldstein; J Simes; V Gebski; J G Kench; A J Gill; J S Samra; N D Merrett; A J Richardson; A P Barbour Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: David A Kooby; Neha L Lad; Malcolm H Squires; Shishir K Maithel; Juan M Sarmiento; Charles A Staley; N Volkan Adsay; Bassel F El-Rayes; Sharon M Weber; Emily R Winslow; Clifford S Cho; Kathryn A Zavala; David J Bentrem; Mark Knab; Syed A Ahmad; Daniel E Abbott; Jeffrey M Sutton; Hong Jin Kim; Jen Jen Yeh; Rachel Aufforth; Charles R Scoggins; Robert C Martin; Alexander A Parikh; Jamie Robinson; Yassar M Hashim; Ryan C Fields; William G Hawkins; Nipun B Merchant Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Avo Artinyan; Perry A Soriano; Christina Prendergast; Tracey Low; Joshua D I Ellenhorn; Joseph Kim Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2008 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Michael W Müller; Helmut Friess; Jörg Kleeff; Rolf Dahmen; Markus Wagner; Ulf Hinz; Daniela Breisch-Girbig; Güralp O Ceyhan; Markus W Büchler Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Ryan P Merkow; Karl Y Bilimoria; James S Tomlinson; Jennifer L Paruch; Jason B Fleming; Mark S Talamonti; Clifford Y Ko; David J Bentrem Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Daniel de la Iglesia-García; Wei Huang; Peter Szatmary; Iria Baston-Rey; Jaime Gonzalez-Lopez; Guillermo Prada-Ramallal; Rajarshi Mukherjee; Quentin M Nunes; J Enrique Domínguez-Muñoz; Robert Sutton Journal: Gut Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Daniel R Principe; Patrick W Underwood; Murray Korc; Jose G Trevino; Hidayatullah G Munshi; Ajay Rana Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 6.244