Literature DB >> 25115425

Value of intraoperative neck margin analysis during Whipple for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a multicenter analysis of 1399 patients.

David A Kooby1, Neha L Lad, Malcolm H Squires, Shishir K Maithel, Juan M Sarmiento, Charles A Staley, N Volkan Adsay, Bassel F El-Rayes, Sharon M Weber, Emily R Winslow, Clifford S Cho, Kathryn A Zavala, David J Bentrem, Mark Knab, Syed A Ahmad, Daniel E Abbott, Jeffrey M Sutton, Hong Jin Kim, Jen Jen Yeh, Rachel Aufforth, Charles R Scoggins, Robert C Martin, Alexander A Parikh, Jamie Robinson, Yassar M Hashim, Ryan C Fields, William G Hawkins, Nipun B Merchant.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: During pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for ductal adenocarcinoma, a frozen section (FS) neck margin is typically assessed, and if positive, additional pancreas is removed to achieve an R0 margin. We analyzed the association of this practice with improved overall survival (OS).
METHODS: Patients who underwent PD for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from January 2000 to August 2012 at 8 academic centers were classified by neck margin status as negative (R0) or microscopically positive (R1) on the basis of FS and permanent section (PS). Impact on OS of converting an FS-R1-neck margin to a PS-R0-neck margin by additional resection was assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 1399 patients had FS neck margins analyzed. Median OS was 19.7 months. On FS, 152 patients (10.9%) were R1, and an additional 51 patients (3.6%) had false-negative FS-R0 margins. PS-R0-neck was achieved in 1196 patients (85.5%), 131 patients (9.3%) remained PS-R1, and 72 patients (5.1%) were converted from FS-R1-to-PS-R0 by additional resection. Median OS for PS-R0-neck patients was 21.1 months versus 13.7 months for PS-R1-neck patients (P < 0.001) and 11.9 months for FS-R1-to-PS-R0 patients (P < 0.001). Both FS-R1-to-PS-R0 and PS-R1-neck patients had larger tumors (P = 0.001), more perineural invasion (P = 0.02), and more node positivity (P = 0.08) than PS-R0-neck patients. On multivariate analysis controlling for adverse pathologic factors, FS-R1-to-PS-R0 conversion remained associated with significantly worse OS compared with PS-R0-neck patients (hazard ratio: 1.55; P = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: For patients who undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, additional resection to achieve a negative neck margin after positive frozen section is not associated with improved OS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25115425     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  23 in total

Review 1.  [R1 resection for pancreatic carcinoma].

Authors:  G F Weber; S Kersting; F Haller; R Grützmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Re-evaluation of classical prognostic factors in resectable ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  Daniel Åkerberg; Daniel Ansari; Roland Andersson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Total compared with partial pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: assessment of resection margin, readmission rate, and survival from the U.S. National Cancer Database.

Authors:  M J Passeri; E H Baker; I A Siddiqui; M A Templin; J B Martinie; D Vrochides; D A Iannitti
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Absence of a Periampullary Mass on Cross-sectional Imaging Delays Diagnosis and Time to Pancreatoduodenectomy But Does Not Impair Outcome.

Authors:  Hideo Takahashi; Maitham A Moslim; Naftali Presser; Colin O'Rourke; Jane Wey; Sricharan Chalikonda; Matthew R Walsh; Gareth Morris-Stiff
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Perception Is Reality: quality metrics in pancreas surgery - a Central Pancreas Consortium (CPC) analysis of 1399 patients.

Authors:  Daniel E Abbott; Grace Martin; David A Kooby; Nipun B Merchant; Malcolm H Squires; Shishir K Maithel; Sharon M Weber; Emily R Winslow; Clifford S Cho; David J Bentrem; Hong Jin Kim; Charles R Scoggins; Robert C Martin; Alexander A Parikh; William G Hawkins; Syed A Ahmad
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 6.  Indications to total pancreatectomy for positive neck margin after partial pancreatectomy: a review of a slippery ground.

Authors:  Stefano Crippa; Giulio Belfiori; Domenico Tamburrino; Stefano Partelli; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-07-31

7.  The association of adjuvant therapy with survival at the population level following pancreatic adenocarcinoma resection.

Authors:  Daniel J Kagedan; Ravish S Raju; Matthew E Dixon; Elizabeth Shin; Qing Li; Ning Liu; Maryam Elmi; Abraham El-Sedfy; Lawrence Paszat; Alexander Kiss; Craig C Earle; Nicole Mittmann; Natalie G Coburn
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Revision of Surgical Margin under Frozen Section to Achieve R0 Status on Survival in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Zi Yin; Yu Zhou; Baohua Hou; Tingting Ma; Min Yu; Chuanzhao Zhang; Xin Lu; Zhixiang Jian
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Long-Term Survivors after Upfront Resection for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: An Actual 5-Year Analysis of Disease-Specific and Post-Recurrence Survival.

Authors:  Giulio Belfiori; Stefano Crippa; Aleotti Francesca; Michele Pagnanelli; Domenico Tamburrino; Giulia Gasparini; Stefano Partelli; Valentina Andreasi; Corrado Rubini; Giuseppe Zamboni; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Advances in Diagnostic and Intraoperative Molecular Imaging of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Willemieke S Tummers; Juergen K Willmann; Bert A Bonsing; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.