| Literature DB >> 31283071 |
Jing Zhang1, Lisa N Kinch2, Qian Cong1, Panagiotis Katsonis3, Olivier Lichtarge3,4, Castrense Savojardo5, Giulia Babbi5, Pier Luigi Martelli5, Emidio Capriotti5, Rita Casadio5, Aditi Garg6, Debnath Pal6, Jochen Weile7,8,9, Song Sun7,8,9, Marta Verby7,8,9, Frederick P Roth7,8,9,10, Nick V Grishin1,2.
Abstract
This paper reports the evaluation of predictions for the "CALM1" challenge in the fifth round of the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation held in 2018. In the challenge, the participants were asked to predict effects on yeast growth caused by missense variants of human calmodulin, a highly conserved protein in eukaryotic cells sensing calcium concentration. The performance of predictors implementing different algorithms and methods is similar. Most predictors are able to identify the deleterious or tolerated variants with modest accuracy, with a baseline predictor based purely on sequence conservation slightly outperforming the submitted predictions. Nevertheless, we think that the accuracy of predictions remains far from satisfactory, and the field awaits substantial improvements. The most poorly predicted variants in this round surround functional CALM1 sites that bind calcium or peptide, which suggests that better incorporation of structural analysis may help improve predictions.Entities:
Keywords: CAGI; calmodulin; disease; missense variants; predictors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31283071 PMCID: PMC6744288 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23857
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Mutat ISSN: 1059-7794 Impact factor: 4.700