Literature DB >> 31283065

Mutation update: Review of TPP1 gene variants associated with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis CLN2 disease.

Emily Gardner1, Mitch Bailey2, Angela Schulz3, Mikel Aristorena1, Nicole Miller2, Sara E Mole1.   

Abstract

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2 (CLN2 disease) is an autosomal recessive condition caused by variants in the TPP1 gene, leading to deficient activity of the lysosomal enzyme tripeptidyl peptidase I (TPP1). We update on the spectrum of TPP1 variants associated with CLN2 disease, comprising 131 unique variants from 389 individuals (717 alleles) collected from the literature review, public databases, and laboratory communications. Previously unrecorded individuals were added to the UCL TPP1-specific database. Two known pathogenic variants, c.509-1 G>C and c.622 C>T (p.(Arg208*)), collectively occur in 60% of affected individuals in the sample, and account for 50% of disease-associated alleles. At least 86 variants (66%) are private to single families. Homozygosity occurs in 45% of individuals where both alleles are known (87% of reported individuals). Atypical CLN2 disease, TPP1 enzyme deficiency with disease onset and/or progression distinct from classic late-infantile CLN2, represents 13% of individuals recorded with associated phenotype. NCBI ClinVar currently holds records for 37% of variants collected here. Effective CLN2 disease management requires early diagnosis; however, irreversible neurodegeneration occurs before a diagnosis is typically reached at age 5. Timely classification and public reporting of TPP1 variants is essential as molecular testing increases in use as a first-line diagnostic test for pediatric-onset neurological disease.
© 2019 The Authors. Human Mutation Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genotype-phenotype correlation; late-infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis; lysosomal storage disorders; neurodegeneration; tripeptidyl peptidase I

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31283065      PMCID: PMC6851559          DOI: 10.1002/humu.23860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


INTRODUCTION

The neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCLs) are a heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative lysosomal storage disorders characterized by the accumulation of neuronal and extraneuronal ceroid lipopigments (Jalanko & Braulke, 2009). To date, mutations in 13 human genes have been linked with NCL disorders (Mole, 2017). Classic late‐infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, CLN2 disease, is the result of tripeptidyl peptidase I (TPP1) deficiency, caused by autosomal recessive inheritance of two pathogenic variants in trans in the TPP1 (MIM# 607998, CLN2) gene (Fietz et al., 2016; Mole, Gardner, Schulz, & Xin, 2018; Sleat et al., 1997). CLN2 disease (MIM# 204500) classically presents with seizure onset at 2–4 years of age, preceded by delayed language development, and followed by rapidly progressing dementia, psychomotor decline (loss of the ability to walk and talk), epilepsy, blindness, and death, typically between 6 years of age and the early teenage years (Mole et al., 2018; Mole, 2001; Nickel et al., 2016; Nickel et al., 2018; Steinfeld et al., 2002). Whereas classic late‐infantile CLN2 disease has a very well defined natural history, there exists a phenotypic spectrum of TPP1 enzyme deficiency in small numbers of patients, some with later onset or protracted disease course (Kohan et al., 2013; Kousi, Lehesjoki, & Mole, 2012). One form of juvenile onset disease was initially described as spinocerebellar ataxia 7 (SCAR7; MIM# 609270) and was later attributed to a TPP1 enzyme deficiency (Sun et al., 2013). Other, variant forms of complex hereditary spastic paraplegia (Kara et al., 2016) and childhood‐onset progressive ataxia (Dy, Sims, & Friedman, 2015) were described clinically before being linked to TPP1 enzyme deficiency. Occasional cases present before the age of 2 years (Nickel et al., 2018). With the knowledge of a shared molecular etiology, rather than being distinct entities, these diseases can be considered part of the same phenotypic spectrum that includes classic late‐infantile CLN2 disease and forms of atypical CLN2 disease. Thus, NCL classification was revised to take into account such phenotypic variation (Williams & Mole, 2012). Effective CLN2 disease management requires timely diagnosis; however, irreversible neurodegeneration often occurs before a diagnosis is typically reached at 5 years of age (Nickel et al., 2018). Early diagnosis has become even more relevant as a recently approved intracerebroventricular enzyme replacement therapy has been shown to effectively slow the rapid decline in motor and language function in patients with CLN2 disease (Schulz et al., 2018). Aside from genetic testing, there are other medical procedures that may increase suspicion of CLN2 disease, for example, severe cerebellar atrophy is the principal sign seen at the time of diagnosis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Williams et al., 2006). Photosensitivity, as detected by electroencephalography, is also an early marker of CLN2 disease (Specchio et al., 2017). The American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines recommend that gene variants be reported in combination with their assessed pathogenicity (Richards et al., 2015). The purpose of this mutation update is to summarize the identified disease‐related genetic variation in the TPP1 gene, with emphasis on clinical classification and genotype–phenotype correlations. There is a clear set of patients with atypical CLN2 disease which includes TPP1 deficiency, from SCAR7 and juvenile NCL. We collected and analyzed variant information from 389 individuals (131 different/independent variants) associated with CLN2 disease to uniformly summarize all TPP1 gene variants.

METHODS

Data sources

Data from the University College London (UCL) TPP1 Locus‐specific Database (https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ncl-disease/) was combined with the described literature searches to collect all TPP1 variants reported to be associated with TPP1 enzyme deficiency and/or related disorders. A PubMed literature search was performed on May 22, 2018, using the following terms: ((CLN2[title] OR Tripeptidyl peptidase[title]) OR (Batten[title] OR NCL[title] OR neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis[title]) AND (late infantile[title] OR late‐infantile[title])) AND ((“mutation”[mesh terms] OR “mutation”[all fields]) OR (“genotype”[mesh terms] OR “genotype”[all fields]) OR (“variant”[mesh terms] OR “variant”[all fields])). Embase was searched using the following searches: (‘tpp1 gene’/de OR ‘cln2 gene’/de OR ‘tripeptidyl peptidase i’/de OR ‘e.c. 3.4.14.9’ OR ‘tripeptidyl peptidase 1′ OR ‘tripeptidyl peptidase i’ OR 'tripeptidyl peptide hydrolase i’ OR ‘tripeptidylpeptidase 1’ OR ‘tripeptidylpeptidase i’ OR 'tripeptidylpeptide hydrolase i’) AND (‘mutation’/de OR ‘gene alteration’ OR ‘genome mutation’ OR ‘mutation’) AND (‘human’/de) 'neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis’/de AND ‘mutation’ AND ‘cln2’ AND ‘human’/de NOT ((‘tpp1 gene’/de OR ‘cln2 gene'/de OR ‘tripeptidyl peptidase i’/de OR ‘e.c. 3.4.14.9’ OR ‘tripeptidyl peptidase 1’ OR ‘tripeptidyl peptidase i’ OR ‘tripeptidyl peptide hydrolase i’ OR ‘tripeptidylpeptidase 1’ OR ‘tripeptidylpeptidase i’ OR ‘tripeptidylpeptide hydrolase i’) AND (‘mutation’/de OR 'gene alteration’ OR ‘genome mutation’ OR 'mutation’) AND ‘human’/de). All variants collected from the UCL TPP1‐specific database and literature searches were assessed using ACMG standards and guidelines for interpretation of sequence variants using available information (Richards et al., 2015). Variants collected from the literature were compared to, and combined with, pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants contained in ClinVitae, a database including the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)’s ClinVar, in addition to several diagnostic laboratories (http://clinvitae.invitae.com/; accessed March 8, 2018). Variant‐level summaries include variants from all sources, whereas individual‐level summaries include literature and database cases, where such information was available. Visualization of TPP1 was created using The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.8 Schrödinger, LLC with atomic coordinates from Brookhaven Protein Data Bank accession number 3EE6 (Pal et al., 2009).

Mutation nomenclature

The mutation nomenclature used in this update follows the guidelines indicated by the Human Genome Variation Society (den Dunnen et al., 2016). For the description of sequence variants, we used reference sequence NM_000391.3 for TPP1 gene. Nucleotide numbering reflects cDNA numbering with position +1 corresponding to the A of the ATG translation initiation codon at nucleotide 62. Mutation descriptions on the protein level consider the initiator methionine as codon 1.

RESULTS

TPP1 mutation spectrum

166 publications were returned using the three searches; eight were unavailable to review. Of the 158 publications reviewed, 90 contained TPP1 variants. All new reports were added to the locus‐specific database at UCL. Overall, 717 alleles were collected from 389 individuals reported in the literature and/or the UCL database, resulting in 131 different/independent TPP1 variants (Table 1). It should be noted that the effect on TPP1 function has not been established for all disease‐associated alleles. In some patients, further variant alleles were found, in addition to those presumed to be disease‐associated. Four of these additional alleles are described in the UCL TPP1 Locus‐specific Database.
Table 1

TPP1 variants expected to cause associated TPP1 enzyme deficiency

LocationNucleotide changeAmino acid change# AllelesClinVar: Clinical significanceContig position (GRCh38.p7)Reference
Intron 01c.17 + 1 G>CNA4NA6619383 C>GKousi et al. (2012)
Intron 01c.18–3 C>GNA1NA6619270 G>CKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 02c.37dupp.(Leu13Profs*32)1NA6619248dupKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 02c.38 T>Cp.(Leu13Pro)1NA6619247 A>GM. Nickel, personal communication
Intron 02c.89 + 1 G>ANA2NA6619195 C>TSaini, Sankhyan, and Singhi (2016)
Intron 02c.89 + 4 A>GNA2NA6619192 T>CNoher de Halac et al. (2005)
Intron 02c.89 + 5 G>CNA8Pathogenic6619191 C>GKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 03c.139 C>Gp.(Leu47Val)1NA6618866 G>CE. de los Reyes, personal communication
Exon 03c.177_180delp.(Glu59Aspfs*20)1NA6618825_6618828delChang et al. (2012)
Exon 03c.184 T>Ap.(Ser62Thr)1NA6618821 A>TKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 03c.184_185delp.(Ser62Glyfs*25)1NA6618820_6618821delLam, Poon, Tong, and Ko (2001)
Exon 03c.196 C>Tp.(Gln66*)7Pathogenic6618809 G>ASleat et al. (1999)
Exon 03c.225 A>Gp.( = )5NA6618780 T>CSleat et al. (1999)
Exon 03c.229 G>Ap.(Gly77Arg)4Pathogenic6618776 C>TSleat et al. (1999)
Exon 03c.229 G>Tp.(Gly77*)1NA6618776 C>AChang et al. (2012)
Intron 03c.229 + 3 G>CNA2NA6618773 C>GR. Williams, personal communication
Exon 04c.237 C>Gp.(Tyr79*)1NA6617769 G>CKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 04c.299 A>Gp.(Gln100Arg)4Benign/likely benign6617707 T>CSleat et al. (1999)
Exon 04c.311 T>Ap.(Leu104*)4Pathogenic6617695 A>TKohan et al. (2008)
Exon 04c.337dupp.(Ser113Phefs*55)1NA6617669dupR. Williams, personal communication
Exon 04c.357dupp.(Leu120Serfs*18)1NA6617649dupZhong et al. (2000)
Exon 04c.379 C>Tp.(Arg127*)2Pathogenic6617627 G>ASleat et al. (1999)
Exon 04c.380 G>Ap.(Arg127Gln)10Pathogenic6617626 C>TZhong et al. (2000)
Intron 04c.380 + 55 G>ANA1NA6617571 C>TMole et al. (2001)
Intron 04c.381–17_381–4delNA1NA6617432_6617445delChang et al. (2012)
Intron 04c.381–2 A>GNA1Likely pathogenic6617430 T>CZhong et al. (2000)
Intron 04c.381–1 G>CNA6NA6617429 C>GKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 04c.377_387delNA2NA6617422_6617629delSleat et al. (1999)
Exon 05c.406_409dupp.(Glu139Glyfs*1)1NA6617400_6617403dupChang et al. (2012)
Exon 05c.457 T>Cp.(Ser153Pro)1NA6617352 A>GCaillaud, Manicom, Peuch, Lobel, and Poenaru (1999)
Exon 05c.481 C>Tp.(Gln161*)1NA6617328 G>AR. Wang, personal communication
Exon 05c.497dupp.(His166Glnfs*22)1NA6617312dupKousi et al. (2012)
Intron 05c.509–1 G>ANA a 5Pathogenic6617154 C>TSleat et al. (1999)
Intron 05c.509–1 G>CNA b 193Pathogenic6617154 C>GSleat et al. (1999)
Exon 06c.605 C>Tp.(Pro202Leu)1Likely pathogenic6617057 G>AMole et al. (2001)
Exon 06c.616 C>Tp.(Arg206Cys)8Pathogenic6617046 G>ABerry‐Kravis et al. (2000)
Exon 06c.617 G>Ap.(Arg206His)1Likely pathogenic6617045 C>TKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 06c.622 C>Tp.(Arg208*)165Pathogenic6617040 G>ASleat et al. (1999)
Exon 06c.625 T>Cp.(Tyr209His)2NA6617037 A>G(Kousi et al., 2012)
Exon 06c.640 C>Tp.(Gln214*)3Pathogenic6617022 G>A(Kousi et al., 2012)
Exon 06c.646 G>Ap.(Val216Met)2NA6617016 C>T(Wang et al., 2011)
Exon 06c.650 G>Tp.(Gly217Asp)1NA6617012 C>AChang et al. (2012)
Exon 07c.713 C>Gp.(Ser238*)1NA6616834 G>CKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 07c.731 T>Cp.(Met244Thr)1NA6616816 A>GM. Nickel, personal communication
Exon 07c.775delp.(Arg259Valfs*17)4NA6616772delGoldberg‐Stern, Halevi, Marom, Straussberg, and Mimouni‐Bloch (2009)
Exon 07c.790 C>Tp.(Gln264*)4NA6616757 G>AKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 07c.822_837delp.(Leu275*)1NA6616757 G>AKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 07c.797 G>Ap.(Arg266Gln)1Uncertain6616750 C>TKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 07c.824 T>Cp.(Leu275Pro)1NA6616723 A>GShen et al. (2013)
Exon 07c.827 A>Tp.(Asp276Val)14Pathogenic6616720 T>AKohan et al. (2009)
Exon 07c.829 G>Ap.(Val277Met)1Not provided6616718 C>TJu et al. (2002)
Exon 07c.833 A>Cp.(Gln278Pro)1NA6616714 T>GJu et al. (2002)
Exon 07c.843 G>Tp.(Met281Ile)1NA6616704 C>AKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 07c.851 G>Tp.(Gly284Val)35Pathogenic6616696 C>AZhong et al. (2000)
Exon 07c.857 A>Gp.(Asn286Ser)4Pathogenic6616690 T>CSteinfeld et al. (2002)
Exon 07c.860 T>Ap.(Ile287Asn)1Not provided6616687 A>TSleat et al. (1999)
Intron 07c.887–18 A>GNA c 1Likely pathogenic6616521 T>CSleat et al. (1999)
Intron 07c.887–10 A>Gvaries12Conflicting6616513 T>CNoher de Halac et al. (2005)
Exon 08c.887 G>Ap.(Gly296Asp)2NA6616503 C>T(Reid et al., 2016)
Exon 08c.959 T>Gp.(Val320Gly)1Uncertain6616431 A>CE. de los Reyes, personal communication
Exon 08c.972_979delp.(Ser324Argfs)3Likely pathogenic6616411_6616418delSleat et al. (1999)
Exon 08c.984_986delp.(Asp328del)1NA6616404_6616406del(Kousi et al., 2012)
Exon 08c.987_989delinsCTCp.(Glu329_Asp330delinsAspSer)1NA6616401_6616403delinsGAGKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 08c.1015 C>Tp.(Arg339Trp)4Pathogenic/likely pathogenic6616375 G>AKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 08c.1016 G>Ap.(Arg339Gln)3Conflicting6616374 C>TKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 08c.1027 G>Ap.(Glu343Lys)3Not provided6616363 C>GSleat et al. (1999)
Exon 08c.1029 G>Cp.(Glu343Asp)1Pathogenic6616361 C>GDy et al. (2015)
Exon 08c.1048 C>Tp.(Arg350Trp)3NA6616342 G>AR. Williams, personal communication
Exon 07c.1049 G>Ap.(Arg350Gln)1Uncertain6616341 C>TM. Nickel, personal communication
Exon 08c.1052 G>Tp.(Gly351Val)2NA6616338 C>Apersonal communication from relative
Exon 08c.1057 A>Cp.(Thr353Pro)2Not provided6616333 T>GSteinfeld et al. (2002)
Exon 08c.1058 C>Ap.(Thr353Asn)1Likely pathogenic6616332 G>TR. Wang, personal communication
Exon 08c.1062delp.(Leu355Serfs*72)1NA6616328del(Kousi et al., 2012)
Exon 08c.1064 T>Cp.(Leu355Pro)1NA6616326 A>GKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 08c.888_1066delp.His298Leufs*31NA6616324_6616502delKousi et al. (2012)
Intron 08c.1075 + 2 T>CNA1NA6616313 A>GKousi et al. (2012)
Intron 08c.1075 + 2 T>GNA1NA6616313 A>CSleat et al. (1999)
Intron 08c.1076–2 A>GNA1NA6616076 T>CCaillaud et al. (1999)
Intron 08c.1076–2 A>TNA3NA6616076 T>AA. Simonati, personal communication
Exon 09c.1094 G>Ap.(Cys365Tyr)6Pathogenic/likely pathogenic6616057 C>TSleat et al. (1999)
Exon 09c.1093 T>Cp.(Cys365Arg)1pathogenic6616057 A>GSleat et al. (1999)
Exon 09c.1107_1108delp.(Gly370Lysfs*32) d 1NA6616042_6616043delKohan et al. (2013)
Exon 10c.1146 C>Gp.(Ser382Arg)1NA6615562 G>CKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 10c.1154 T>Ap.(Val385Asp)1Not provided6615554 A>TSleat et al. (1999)
Exon 10c.1166 G>Ap.(Gly389Glu)4Pathogenic6615542 C>TSleat et al. (1999)
Exon 10c.1204 G>Tp.(Glu402*)2NA6615504 C>AKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 10c.1226 G>Tp.(Gly409Val)1NA6615482 C>AC. Fagerstrom, personal communication
Exon 10c.1239_1240ins6p.(Ser413_Asn414ins2)1NA6615468_6615469ins6R. Williams, personal communication
Exon 10c.1261 T>Ap.(Tyr421Asn)1NA6615447 A>TM. Nickel, personal communication
Exon 10c.1266 G>Cp.(Gln422His)11Pathogenic6615442 C>G(Sleat et al., 1999)
Intron 10c.1266 + 5 G>ANA1Conflicting6615437 C>TSleat et al. (1999)
Exon 11C.1278 A>Bp.(Val426Val)2NA6615318 A>BNoher de Halac et al. (2005)
Exon 11c.1284 G>Tp.(Lys428Asn)1NA6615312 C>AJu et al. (2002)
Exon 11c.1340 G>Ap.(Arg447His)8Pathogenic6615256 C>TSleat et al. (1999)
Exon 11c.1343 C>Tp.(Ala448Val)1NA6615253 G>AKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 11c.1351 G>Tp.(Asp451Tyr)2NA6615245 C>AR. Wang, personal communication
Exon 11c.1358 C>Ap.(Ala453Asp)2NA6615238 G>TKohan et al. (2013)
Exon 11c.1358 C>Tp.(Ala453Val)2NA6615238 G>AKohan et al. (2009)
Exon 11c.1361 C>Ap.(Ala454Glu)1Not provided6615235 G>TSleat et al. (1999)
Exon 11c.1376 A>Cp.(Tyr459Ser)4Likely pathogenic6615220 T>G(Bhavsar et al., 2016)
Exon 11c.1379 G>Ap.(Trp460*)1Pathogenic/likely pathogenic6615217 C>TZhong et al. (2000)
Exon 11c.1397 T>Gp.(Val466Gly)6Pathogenic6615199 A>CSun et al. (2013)
Exon 11c.1417 G>Ap.(Gly473Arg)2Not provided6615179 C>TLam et al. (2001)
Exon 11c.1424 C>Tp.(Ser475Leu)9Not provided6615172 G>ASleat et al. (1999)
Exon 11c.1424delp.(Ser475Trpfs*13)8NA6615172delMoore et al. (2008)
Intron 11c.1425 + 1 G>CNA1NA6615170 C>GKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 12c.1439 T>Gp.(Val480Gly)2NA6614978 A>CElleder et al. (2008)
Exon 12c.1442 T>Gp.(Phe481Cys)1NA6614975 A>CJu et al. (2002)
Exon 12c.1444 G>Cp.(Gly482Arg)2Not provided6614973 C>GKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 12c.1467delp.(Asn489Lysfs*29)1NA6614950delR. Williams, personal communication
Exon 12c.1497delp.(Gly501Alafs*18)1Pathogenic6614920delKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 12c.1501 G>Tp.(Gly501Cys)1NA6614916 C>AKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 12c.1510 A>Tp.(Asn504Tyr)1NA6614907 T>AKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 12c.1525 C>Tp.(Gln509*)20NA6614892 G>ACaillaud et al. (1999)
exon 12c.1547_1548insTCATp.(Asp517Hisfs*1)1NA6614869_6614870insATGAChang et al. (2012)
Exon 12c.1547_1548delp.(Phe516*)3NA6614869_6614870delKousi et al. (2012)
Intron 12c.1551 + 1 G>ANA1Likely pathogenic6614865 C>TWang et al. (2011)
intron 12c.1551 + 1 G>TNA1NA6614865 C>AYu, Liu, Chen, Zhang, and Wang (2015)
Intron 12c.1551 + 5_1551 + 6delinsTANA3NA6614860_6614861delinsTAKousi et al. (2012)
Intron 12c.1552–1 G>CNA2NA6614687 C>GSleat et al. (1999)
Exon 13c.1595dupp.(Gln534Profs*74)1NA6614643dupSleat et al. (1999)
Exon 13c.1603 G>Cp.(Gly535Arg)2NA6614635 C>GKohan et al. (2013)
Exon 13c.1613C>Ap.(Ser538Tyr)1NA6614625 G>TYu et al. (2015)
Exon 13c.1611_1621delp.(Cys537Trpfs*67)1NA6614617_6614627delCaillaud et al. (1999)
Exon 13c.1626 G>Ap.(Trp542*)1NA6614612 C>TC. Fagerstrom, personal communication
Exon 13c.1630C>Tp.(Pro544Ser) e 1Not provided6614608 G>AZhong et al. (2000)
Exon 13c.1642T>Cp.(Trp548Arg)1NA6614596 A>GZhong et al. (2000)
Exon 13c.1644 G>Ap.(Trp548*)1NA6614594 C>TKousi et al. (2012)
Exon 13c.1678_1679delp.(Leu560Thrfs*47)4NA6614559_6614560delSleat et al. (1999)
Exon 07NAUncharacterised 1‐bp deletion1NAJu et al. (2002)
Uncharacterised 5′ rearrangement resulting in insertion of intron sequences and frameshiftNA1NANAHartikainen et al. (1999)

Previously described as splice defect / p.(Gly171Thrfs*5).

Previously described as p.(Phe169*).

Previously described as splice defect / frameshift / deletion insertion.

Predicted amino acid effect using EMBOSS.

Previously described as p.(Ala555Pro).

NA, not applicable.

TPP1 variants expected to cause associated TPP1 enzyme deficiency Previously described as splice defect / p.(Gly171Thrfs*5). Previously described as p.(Phe169*). Previously described as splice defect / frameshift / deletion insertion. Predicted amino acid effect using EMBOSS. Previously described as p.(Ala555Pro). NA, not applicable. The variant c.299 A>G (p.(Gln100Arg)) has a frequency below 5% (National Center for Biotechnology Information, 2018) and is predicted benign. It occurred as an additional allele in three unrelated patients with classic late‐infantile CLN2 disease (Sleat et al., 1999; Tessa, Simonati, Tavoni, Bertini, & Santorelli, 2000), but it also occurred as the disease‐associated allele in trans with c.1266 + 5 G>A in a patient from Canada (disease phenotype unknown) (Kousi et al., 2012). The underlying sequence change for variant p.(Val426Val) is not available, therefore this variant cannot be assessed for potential alteration to splicing. In our data set, this variant occurred in two unrelated patients from Argentina, together with another variant of uncertain significance (c.89 + 4 A>G; Kohan et al., 2013; Noher de Halac et al., 2005). This latter variant potentially causes alteration of splicing and has been described as disease‐associated in one patient from Argentina (disease phenotype unknown). Finally, c.1501 G>T (p.(Gly501Cys)) is predicted as probably damaging and occurs in one patient from Turkey (disease phenotype unknown) (Kousi et al., 2012). It occurs (phase unknown) with c.622 C>T (p.(Arg208*)) and c.1343 C>T (p.Ala448Val)), which is also predicted as probably damaging. For the latter three additional alleles, there is no information on population frequency. Thus, for these four cases, the assignment of disease‐association is equivocal. Other additional alleles excluded from the analyses were listed in ClinVar as benign and/or have a prevalence in the population>5%. To date, of the 131 variants reported in the UCL database as disease‐associated, only 39 (30%) are recorded in ClinVar with an associated clinical classification. Of the variants where relatedness could be established, 86/131 disease‐associated variants (66%) were private to single families. The spectrum of disease‐associated variants (131) was dominated by missense variants (63, 48%) followed by frameshift (21, 16% each) and nonsense (17, 13%) variant classes (Figure 1). Disease‐causing variants appear along the length of the TPP1 gene, including the propeptide domain (Figure 2).
Figure 1

Spectrum of TPP1 variants described

Figure 2

TPP1 gene structure and variants reported>two times. Domain information from InterPro accession O14773. Numbers within the arrows are the frequency with which variants were reported in the registry

Spectrum of TPP1 variants described TPP1 gene structure and variants reported>two times. Domain information from InterPro accession O14773. Numbers within the arrows are the frequency with which variants were reported in the registry

Genotype–phenotype correlation

Clinical phenotype classification was available in 65% of reports (254/389). Of those with reported phenotype classifications, the majority were classic late‐infantile (87%), with 13% atypical CLN2 disease (8% juvenile, 3% spinocerebellar ataxia or SCAR7, and <1% spastic paraplegia or congenital disease). Note that NCL phenotype descriptions were based on the age of disease onset: congenital, around birth; infantile, 0.5–1.5 years; late‐infantile, 2–4 years; juvenile, 5–10 years. Most individuals (87% [337/389]) had both alleles identified; of these, homozygosity was reported in 151 (45%) patients. Geographical information was available for 356 individuals (92% of cases), with the majority of patients originating from Europe (217) followed by North America (78), South America (28), Asia (9), the Middle East (9), a mixture of Europe and other countries (8), Central America (5), and Africa (2). Overall, the two most frequently reported variants (c.509–1 G>C and c.622 C>T [p.(Arg208*)]) collectively occurred in 60% of individuals reported and accounted for 50% of disease‐associated alleles (Table 2). On a regional level, these variants appeared less frequently outside Europe and North America (Figure 3). The allele c.851 G>T (p.(Gly284Val)), originally identified in Newfoundland, was the second most common allele in North America and is a well‐characterized founder effect mutation in classic late‐infantile CLN2 disease (Fietz et al., 2016). In addition, c.1525 C>T (p.(Gln509*)) was the predominant mutated allele reported in the Middle East and also occurred in Europe. So far, c.640 C>T (p.(Gln214*)) has only been reported in China and Italy; these may also be examples of founder mutations.
Table 2

Disease‐associated TPP1 variants reported ≥ 10 times

Nucleotide changeAmino acid changeNumber of times reported (% of reported alleles, N = 717)
c.509–1 G>CSplice acceptor variant193 (27%)
c.622 C>Tp.(Arg208*)165 (23%)
c.851 G>Tp.(Gly284Val)35 (4.9%)
c.1525 C>Tp.(Gln509*)20 (2.8%)
c.827 A>Tp.(Asp276Val)14 (2.0%)
c.887–10 A>GVariable12 (1.7%)
c.1266 G>Cp.(Gln422His)11 (1.5%)
c.380 G>Ap.(Arg127Gln)10 (1.4%)

Note: Nucleotide changes are according to NM_000391.3; protein changes are according to NP_000382.3. The emphasis now is on collecting new variants; frequency of the most common variants is, therefore, underrepresented here as new reports for these are no longer included in the UCL TPP1 locus‐specific database.

Figure 3

Most common alleles listed in the TPP1 locus‐specific database by region of origin. The number of times an allele was encountered is shown in parentheses. North America includes Newfoundland. Note: The emphasis now is on collecting new variants; frequency of the most common variants is, therefore, underrepresented here as new reports for these are no longer included in the UCL TPP1 locus‐specific database.

Disease‐associated TPP1 variants reported ≥ 10 times Note: Nucleotide changes are according to NM_000391.3; protein changes are according to NP_000382.3. The emphasis now is on collecting new variants; frequency of the most common variants is, therefore, underrepresented here as new reports for these are no longer included in the UCL TPP1 locus‐specific database. Most common alleles listed in the TPP1 locus‐specific database by region of origin. The number of times an allele was encountered is shown in parentheses. North America includes Newfoundland. Note: The emphasis now is on collecting new variants; frequency of the most common variants is, therefore, underrepresented here as new reports for these are no longer included in the UCL TPP1 locus‐specific database. Disease alleles occur either as homozygous or as compound heterozygous, and the disease phenotype manifested likely reflects the combined effect of the alleles on TPP1 function. The NCL database presents data from individual patients, allowing supposition of genotype‐phenotype correlation (https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ncl-disease/) Several variants have only been associated with the classic late‐infantile CLN2 disease phenotype. The c.851 G>T (p.(Gly284Val)) variant appeared 27 times in the collected population, in individuals with classic late‐infantile CLN2 disease from 26 patients in Canada and one patient in the US. Similarly, c.827 A>T (p.(Asp276Val)) was reported only in Argentina and Chile. The c.616 C>T (p.Arg206Cys) variant was also unique to classic late‐infantile CLN2 disease, and three out of the four patients reported to have it resided in India. One large deletion, spanning exon 8, was reported (c.888_1066del [p.(His298Leufs*3)]) in one patient from the US with unrecorded phenotype. Substitutions at residue 343 are reported in patients with different phenotypes: p.(Glu343Lys); c.1027 G>A in classic late‐infantile CLN2 disease and p.(Glu343Asp); c.1027 G>A in atypical CLN2 disease. A number of variants were only associated with atypical CLN2 disease. The c.887–10 A>G (variable amino acid change) variant, which was reported 12 times and only in South America (Argentina, Chile, Colombia), Portugal, and Spain, likely causes an in‐frame inclusion of intron 7 and appears mainly in patients with a juvenile age of onset. Lastly, c.1397 T>G (p.(Val466Gly)) has only been reported six times in patients from the Netherlands with atypical CLN2 disease (SCAR7), in trans with the common c.509–1 G>C splice variant.

Biological significance

TPP1 (NM_000391.3) maps to chromosome 11p15 and encodes the lysosomal exopeptidase, TPP1. Upon acidification, the inactive proenzyme form (Figure 4) is processed to a 46 kDa protein. The mature enzyme cleaves tripeptides from the amino terminus of small polypeptides undergoing degradation in the lysosomes and has weak endopeptidase activity (Lin, Sohar, Lackland, & Lobel, 2001; Pal et al., 2009). In vivo substrates of TPP1 are not well characterized and the pathological mechanisms underlying the disease remain unclear (Cooper, Tarczyluk, & Nelvagal, 2015; Palmer, Barry, Tyynelä, & Cooper, 2013; Stumpf et al., 2017).
Figure 4

TPP1 proenzyme structure and missense variants reported ≥ three times. Three‐dimensional structure of TPP1 dimers (Pal et al., 2009). Active site (catalytic triad, Ser475‐Glu272‐Asp360) pocket residues are shown as red space‐filling models, calcium binding sites (Asp517‐Val518‐Gly539‐Asp543) in blue.

TPP1 proenzyme structure and missense variants reported ≥ three times. Three‐dimensional structure of TPP1 dimers (Pal et al., 2009). Active site (catalytic triad, Ser475Glu272Asp360) pocket residues are shown as red space‐filling models, calcium binding sites (Asp517Val518Gly539Asp543) in blue. Mutations identified in TPP1 are distributed over the whole protein structure (Figure 2) and the majority are likely linked to loss of enzyme activity, though very few will have been confirmed to do this biochemically. Loss of TPP1 activity leads to neuropeptide degradation failure and significant accumulation of subunit c of ATP synthase. However, accumulation of subunit c has been identified in most forms of NCL and other lysosomal storage disorders, suggesting that this may not be the primary metabolic error in TPP1 deficiency (Palmer et al., 2013; Ryazantsev, Yu, Zhao, Neufeld, & Ohmi, 2007). Several common pathogenic cascades have been identified in lysosomal storage disorders, including altered lipid trafficking, autophagy, altered calcium homeostasis and oxidative stress (Vitner, Platt, & Futerman, 2010). Specifically, in vitro studies have linked TPP1 deficiency to oxidative stress and changes in mitochondrial morphology (Van Beersel et al., 2013). Regardless of the initiating mechanisms, the uniform neuropathological features of the NCLs may suggest the existence of shared pathogenic pathways for NCL proteins (Haltia, 2006; Palmer et al., 2013).

Clinical and diagnostic relevance

Diagnosis of CLN2 disease may be reached through a mixture of clinical findings, TPP1 enzyme deficiency, and/or molecular findings in TPP1 (Fietz et al., 2016). Historically, diagnoses of NCL subtypes have relied on histopathological techniques, such as an electron microscope evaluation of autofluorescent storage material morphology, together with a clinical review of disease onset and symptoms (Williams et al., 2006). Assaying of white blood cell TPP1 activity is now the mainstay of diagnosis for TPP1‐related diseases (Fietz et al., 2016). Whereas this provides a direct test for CLN2 disease, it requires a specific suspicion of CLN2 or other NCL. By that point, there will have been significant disease progression and neurodegeneration (Nickel et al., 2016). Alongside the demonstration of deficient TPP1 enzyme activity, detection of two pathogenic mutations in trans is considered the gold standard for CLN2 disease diagnosis (Fietz et al., 2016). Unlike biochemical testing, molecular genetic testing can be used to test multiple etiologies, and potentially lead to a patients phenotype. This means that no specific suspicion of an etiology is required, positioning these broad next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐based tests as a tool for earlier diagnosis of genetic diseases. NGS techniques such as whole exome sequencing (WES) have emerged in recent years as useful tools for enhancing NCL subtype classification, particularly when mutations in different genes cause similar and overlapping phenotypes (Patiño et al., 2014). Timely diagnosis facilitates the early initiation of appropriate disease‐specific care and enables families to make informed decisions about treatment goals (Williams et al., 2017). Unexplained seizures, especially if preceded by early language developmental delay, can be an early symptom of CLN2 disease. In children without a specific CLN2 indication who present with delayed language skills, experts recommend investigating pediatric‐onset seizures using an epilepsy gene panel (Fietz et al., 2016; Lemke et al., 2012), as an approach to decrease time to the differential diagnosis of CLN2 disease. Patients with CLN2 may encounter diagnostic delay due to the inexperience of their treating physicians and lack of awareness of NCL disorders. This may be a particular challenge in countries with an abundance of variant phenotypes due to diverse ethnic populations (Kohan et al., 2009). In an era where broad molecular tests are being used (e.g., gene panels, WES), the professional interpreting and/or conveying of test results to physicians, patients, or families is likely to not be an expert in CLN2 or NCLs overall. Experts in the area may know where to easily locate the TPP1 locus‐specific database at UCL, but this database is less well‐known by general physicians. Central databases, like ClinVar, are widely used for all genetic diseases and are positioned as resources for any medical professional. The sharing of variant and clinical information with both NCL/CLN2 expert audiences, as well as non‐experts, facilitates both efficient researches of CLN2 disease and other NCLs and accurate interpretation of genetic testing results. Interpreting the variants identified by molecular genetic tests can be cumbersome or unclear, particularly in cases of novel missense and/or in frame variation. In CLN2 disease, most patients (60%, in this database) have one of two common variants (c.509–1 G>C and c.622 C>T [p.(Arg208*)]), which have been consistently reported as pathogenic. If patients have any indication of CLN2 disease, and molecular testing finds any pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in TPP1, TPP1 enzyme activity testing can be used to confirm the diagnosis. In addition, if a second variant is not identified, but enzyme activity is deficient, this can be used as evidence to classify any other potentially deleterious variants in the patient as well as provide a laboratory‐based diagnosis of CLN2 disease (Fietz et al., 2016; Richards et al., 2015).

Relevant animal models

The TPP1 gene shows wide conservation in vertebrates (e.g., human, macaque, mouse, and cow; Wlodawer et al., 2003), but there is no obvious orthologue in lower organisms (e.g., Drosophila, Caenorhabditis elegans, or Saccharomyces cerevisiae). However, TPP1 does belong to a family of enzymes with members found in bacteria (Oda et al., 1996; Oda, Takahashi, Tokuda, Shibano, & Takahashi, 1994). A novel TPP1 orthologue, located in the lysosomes of the amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum, has also been described (Phillips & Gomer, 2015). Zebrafish with a TPP1 deficiency die prematurely and show ubiquitous storage material containing ATP synthase subunit c, with it being more evident in the CNS and muscles (Mahmood et al., 2013). The early stop codon in exon 3 (which is also described in humans but at a different amino acid position) leads to an early‐onset neurodegenerative phenotype and functional motor impairment preceded by a phase of hyperactivity that could be consistent with seizures. The zebrafish model also shows significant apoptotic cell death and aberrant proliferation in the optic tectum, cerebellum, and retina. As mouse models for CLN2 disease do not seem to suffer from visual problems or retinal degeneration (see below), the study of this aspect of the disease could utilize these findings from the zebrafish model. The first TPP1 deficient mouse model (mixed background [C57BL/6:129S6]) was generated by knock‐in of the CLN2‐specific p.(Arg447His) missense mutation into the Tpp1 gene in combination with a large intronic insertion (Sleat et al., 2004). The lack of activity of TPP1 protein does not affect the initial stages of development but evolves with signs of progressive neurological deficits with aging. The lifespan is drastically reduced (median survival 138d) and the mice display early motor deficits, seizures, spontaneous tremors, and ataxia (Sleat et al., 2004). The neurological impairment is visible in the brain, spinal cord, and peripheral sensory neurons, with an accumulation of autofluorescent material in the lysosomes. The severe loss of neurons in the cerebral cortex that is observed in the human late‐infantile CLN2 disease is not that obvious, but there is a clear loss of Purkinje cells which could be linked to the cerebellar ataxia. Studies on the histology of the retina do not show any loss of photoreceptors or any reduction in cell layers (Sleat et al., 2004). More recently, a mouse model encoding the most common nonsense mutation found in humans, an early stop codon instead of arginine in the 208 positions (p.Arg207* in mice), has been generated and described (Geraets et al., 2017). The resulting transcript reduction leads to reduced enzymatic activity in different organs, such as the liver, spleen, or cerebellum. Consequently, mice show a reduced lifespan, with most dying between 3 and 6 months of age. As observed in the previous mouse model (Sleat et al., 2004), impaired motor behavior is observed and characterized by tremors, seizures, hyperactivity, and strength deficits. The visual phenotype was not studied. Histological evaluation of the brain displayed an accumulation of the mitochondrial ATP synthase subunit c in superficial or deep cortical layers. Showing a similar phenotype to the pre‐existing mouse model, this new transgenic mouse could be used for the preclinical evaluation of all therapeutic approaches including mutation‐guided therapies. To date there is evidence of NCL in over 20 canine breeds and mixed‐breed dogs (Katz, Rustad et al., 2017). The canine Tpp1 gene sequence (GenBank AF114167) includes all 13 exons that are present in the human TPP1 gene, and exonic sequences are highly conserved between both species (Drögemüller, Wöhlke, & Distl, 2005). The first report of NCL in Dachshund dogs described a neurodegenerative disease starting with hind‐leg weakness at 3 years of age (Cummings & de Lahunta, 1977). Histological analysis showed cerebellar atrophy together with marked loss of neurons and Purkinje cells in the area. Ultrastructural studies revealed various membrane‐bound inclusions in addition to the autofluorescent lipofuscin granules. No genetics or biochemical analysis was performed in this study, so the genetic basis of this disease is unknown. However, another Dachshund dog model, with earlier disease onset, was found to be homozygous for the mutant c.325delC allele in Tpp1 (Awano et al., 2006). The first symptoms (vomiting, mental dullness, loss of housebreaking, and unresponsiveness to previously learned commands) were visible at approximately 9 months of age. The disease progressed with gradual loss of sight and ataxia (10 months), and myoclonus of the head with seizures (11 months). This model showed episodes of hyperactivity and howling, and later exhibited aggressive behavior, a hypermetric gait, and incessant circling. Vomiting became more frequent and diarrhea subsequently developed. Finally, diarrhea progressed to hematochezia, with death by 12 months of age. The TPP1 activity measured in the brain was less than 1% of that observed in the cortex of control dogs, resulting in autofluorescent storage bodies in all examined regions of the CNS. The ultrastructural electron microscopy analysis of the bodies consistently showed the curvilinear forms characteristic of the human CLN2 mutations (Awano et al., 2006). All previously described animal models, regardless of the type of mutation, share the most common symptoms observed for human pathology due to the reduced levels of TPP1 protein. Thus, animal models are an invaluable resource to test different therapeutic strategies, such as gene therapy, cell transplantation, chemical compounds, or enzymatic replacement. Given the nature of the symptoms and the progression of the disease, most efforts are focused on the CNS and loss of vision. However, it is crucial to take into account that the storage bodies are found to accumulate in all visceral organs, so there may be extraneuronal pathology. A recent publication showed systemic signs of the disease in dogs after delayed neurological progression due to successful intracerebroventricular gene therapy (Katz et al., 2014, 2017; Vuillemenot et al., 2015). If the therapeutic approaches to treat the CNS succeed, animal models could provide valuable insight into further challenges affecting the life expectancy and the quality of life of the patients.

Future prospects

The newly approved intracerebroventricular enzyme replacement therapy has rendered CLN2 disease from an untreatable to treatable disease, especially if treatment is started early before significant neurodegeneration has already taken place (Schulz et al., 2018). The ultimate effort to improve early diagnosis of a now treatable disease is newborn screening (NBS). Experts suggest that assaying TPP1 activity with enzyme substrates compatible with tandem mass spectrometry detection could support future large‐scale NBS programs (Barcenas et al., 2014; Fietz et al., 2016). The adoption of successful NBS programs for CLN2 also relies heavily on the clarity of genotype–phenotype correlations. There must be a concerted effort to ascertain the disease liability of TPP1 variants to facilitate interpretation of variants detected through population‐based screening and diagnostic molecular genetic testing. The algorithm for detection should maximize specificity, achieve a high positive predictive value, and have a low false‐positive rate (Pitt, 2010). There is also the more distant possibility of whole exome or whole genomic sequencing on all newborns, which could be followed by specific testing for predicted enzyme deficiencies. In addition, a robust understanding of genotype–phenotype correlations would facilitate interpretation of NBS data.

CONCLUSION

To date, 131 TPP1 gene variants have been reported in 389 individuals with TPP1 deficiency. The majority of disease‐causing TPP1 variants are private. Currently, only 30% of TPP1 variants reported here are in the NCBI ClinVar database with an associated ACMG clinical classification. Most individuals with TPP1 deficiency have one of two variants: c.622 C>T (p.(Arg208*) or c.509–1 G>C. The uniform and timely reporting of all variants not only benefits families by providing a definitive diagnosis, but has also allowed genotype–phenotype correlations to be considered, and in some cases, reassessed. The inclusion of all variants in a database, disease‐causing or not, is useful. If a variant has previously been proved benign, this could expedite interpretation and diagnosis. Comprehensive reporting and data sharing is essential as molecular genetic testing increases as a first‐line diagnostic test for pediatric‐onset neurological disease. The long‐established NCL mutation database remains a valuable resource for collecting TPP1 variants. To contribute to the UCL NCL database, please contact Sara Mole (s.mole@ucl.ac.uk).

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

A. Schulz has received personal fees from BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., outside of the submitted work. M. Aristorena has no conflicts of interest to declare. M. Bailey was an employee of BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. at the time of the study. N. Miller was an employee of BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. at the time of the study. Professor S. E. Mole receives financial support from BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. to maintain the NCL Mutation Database and acts as an advisor to BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. on mutations in TPP1.
  65 in total

1.  Identification of novel CLN2 mutations shows Canadian specific NCL2 alleles.

Authors:  W Ju; R Zhong; S Moore; D Moroziewicz; J R Currie; P Parfrey; W T Brown; N Zhong
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 2.  Common and uncommon pathogenic cascades in lysosomal storage diseases.

Authors:  Einat B Vitner; Frances M Platt; Anthony H Futerman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  A novel CLN2/TPP1 mutation in a patient with late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis.

Authors:  Feng Yu; Xiao-Min Liu; Yin-He Chen; Sheng-Quan Zhang; Kai Wang
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Clinical study in Chinese patients with late-infantile form neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses.

Authors:  Xingzhi Chang; Yu Huang; Hongdi Meng; Yuwu Jiang; Ye Wu; Hui Xiong; Shuang Wang; Jiong Qin
Journal:  Brain Dev       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 1.961

5.  Evaluation of the canine TPP1 gene as a candidate for neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis in Tibetan Terrier and Polish Owczarek Nizinny dogs.

Authors:  C Drögemüller; A Wöhlke; O Distl
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis: quantitative description of the clinical course in patients with CLN2 mutations.

Authors:  Robert Steinfeld; Peter Heim; Henning von Gregory; Kerstin Meyer; Kurt Ullrich; Hans H Goebel; Alfried Kohlschütter
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2002-11-01

7.  A mouse model of classical late-infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis based on targeted disruption of the CLN2 gene results in a loss of tripeptidyl-peptidase I activity and progressive neurodegeneration.

Authors:  David E Sleat; Jennifer A Wiseman; Mukarram El-Banna; Kwi-Hye Kim; Qinwen Mao; Sandy Price; Shannon L Macauley; Richard L Sidman; Michael M Shen; Qi Zhao; Marco A Passini; Beverly L Davidson; Gregory R Stewart; Peter Lobel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Cloning, nucleotide sequence, and expression of an isovaleryl pepstatin-insensitive carboxyl proteinase gene from Pseudomonas sp. 101.

Authors:  K Oda; T Takahashi; Y Tokuda; Y Shibano; S Takahashi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-10-21       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type CLN2: a new rationale for the construction of phenotypic subgroups based on a survey of 25 cases in South America.

Authors:  Romina Kohan; María Noelia Carabelos; Winnie Xin; Katherine Sims; Norberto Guelbert; Inés Adriana Cismondi; Patricia Pons; Graciela Irene Alonso; Mónica Troncoso; Scarlet Witting; David A Pearce; Raquel Dodelson de Kremer; Ana María Oller-Ramírez; Inés Noher de Halac
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 3.688

10.  Gene symbol: TPP1. Disease: Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis, late infantile.

Authors:  Romina Kohan; Vivien J Muller; Michael J Fietz; Adriana I Cismondi; Ana M Oller Ramírez; Inés Noher Halac
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.881

View more
  20 in total

1.  A Novel Porcine Model of CLN2 Batten Disease that Recapitulates Patient Phenotypes.

Authors:  Vicki J Swier; Katherine A White; Tyler B Johnson; Jessica C Sieren; Hans J Johnson; Kevin Knoernschild; Xiaojun Wang; Frank A Rohret; Christopher S Rogers; David A Pearce; Jon J Brudvig; Jill M Weimer
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 6.088

2.  Visual perception and macular integrity in non-classical CLN2 disease.

Authors:  Angela Schulz; Simon Dulz; Yevgeniya Atiskova; Jan Wildner; Eva Wibbeler; Miriam Nickel; Martin Stephan Spitzer; Christoph Schwering
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Slowing late infantile Batten disease by direct brain parenchymal administration of a rh.10 adeno-associated virus expressing CLN2.

Authors:  Dolan Sondhi; Stephen M Kaminsky; Neil R Hackett; Odelya E Pagovich; Jonathan B Rosenberg; Bishnu P De; Alvin Chen; Benjamin Van de Graaf; Jason G Mezey; Grace W Mammen; Denesy Mancenido; Fang Xu; Barry Kosofsky; Kaleb Yohay; Stefan Worgall; Robert J Kaner; Mark Souwedaine; Bruce M Greenwald; Michael Kaplitt; Jonathan P Dyke; Douglas J Ballon; Linda A Heier; Szilard Kiss; Ronald G Crystal
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Presymptomatic treatment of classic late-infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis with cerliponase alfa.

Authors:  J Schaefers; L J van der Giessen; C Klees; E H Jacobs; S Sieverdink; M H G Dremmen; J K H Spoor; A T van der Ploeg; J M P van den Hout; H H Huidekoper
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.123

5.  Mutation update: Review of TPP1 gene variants associated with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis CLN2 disease.

Authors:  Emily Gardner; Mitch Bailey; Angela Schulz; Mikel Aristorena; Nicole Miller; Sara E Mole
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.878

6.  "Real world effectiveness of cerliponase alfa in classical and atypical patients. A case series".

Authors:  O M Espitia Segura; Z Hernández; N I Mancilla; R A Naranjo; L Tavera
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab Rep       Date:  2021-02-03

7.  Revealing the clinical phenotype of atypical neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2 disease: Insights from the largest cohort in the world.

Authors:  Charles M Lourenço; Andre Pessoa; Carmen C Mendes; Carolina Rivera-Nieto; Diane Vergara; Mónica Troncoso; Emily Gardner; Francisca Mallorens; Lina Tavera; Luis A Lizcano; Nora Atanacio; Norberto Guelbert; Norma Specola; Nury Mancilla; Carolina F M de Souza; Sara E Mole
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 1.954

8.  Cerliponase Alfa for the Treatment of Atypical Phenotypes of CLN2 Disease: A Retrospective Case Series.

Authors:  Eva Wibbeler; Raymond Wang; Emily de Los Reyes; Nicola Specchio; Paul Gissen; Norberto Guelbert; Miriam Nickel; Christoph Schwering; Lenora Lehwald; Marina Trivisano; Laura Lee; Gianni Amato; Jessica Cohen-Pfeffer; Renée Shediac; Fernanda Leal-Pardinas; Angela Schulz
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 1.987

9.  Targeted re-sequencing for early diagnosis of genetic causes of childhood epilepsy: the Italian experience from the 'beyond epilepsy' project.

Authors:  Elisabetta Amadori; Marcello Scala; Giulia Sofia Cereda; Maria Stella Vari; Francesca Marchese; Veronica Di Pisa; Maria Margherita Mancardi; Thea Giacomini; Laura Siri; Fabiana Vercellino; Domenico Serino; Alessandro Orsini; Alice Bonuccelli; Irene Bagnasco; Amanda Papa; Carlo Minetti; Duccio Maria Cordelli; Pasquale Striano
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 10.  Structural Features of Nucleoprotein CST/Shelterin Complex Involved in the Telomere Maintenance and Its Association with Disease Mutations.

Authors:  Mohd Amir; Parvez Khan; Aarfa Queen; Ravins Dohare; Mohamed F Alajmi; Afzal Hussain; Asimul Islam; Faizan Ahmad; Imtaiyaz Hassan
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 7.666

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.