| Literature DB >> 31282100 |
Neelesh Dewan1,2, Vibha Shukla1,2, Ashish K Rehni1,2, Kevin B Koronowski1,2,3, Kyle D Klingbeil1,2, Holly Stradecki-Cohan1,2,3, Timothy J Garrett4, Tatjana Rundek2,5, Miguel A Perez-Pinzon1,2,3,5, Kunjan R Dave1,2,3,5.
Abstract
AIMS: Exposure to recurrent hypoglycemia (RH) is common in diabetic patients receiving glucose-lowering therapies and is implicated in causing cognitive impairments. Despite the significant effect of RH on hippocampal function, the underlying mechanisms are currently unknown. Our goal was to determine the effect of RH exposure on hippocampal metabolism in treated streptozotocin-diabetic rats.Entities:
Keywords: diabetes; enzyme kinetics; glycolysis; hippocampus; metabolomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31282100 PMCID: PMC6930817 DOI: 10.1111/cns.13186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: CNS Neurosci Ther ISSN: 1755-5930 Impact factor: 5.243
Figure 1A, Schematic diagram of the experimental paradigm. B, Blood glucose levels after streptozotocin injection, before and after insulin pellet implantation. Blood glucose levels measured for ITD + RH + glucose (n = 16) and ITD + RH (n = 16) groups after streptozotocin injection (ie, before insulin pellet implantation) and following insulin pellet implantation (at the time of tissue harvest). C, Blood glucose levels during hypoglycemia for ITD + RH + glucose (n = 16) and ITD + RH (n = 16) groups. *P < 0.05 vs pre‐insulin pellet implantation (ie, untreated diabetes)
Figure 2The effect of exposure to hypoglycemia to ITD rats on hippocampal metabolic pathways. A, Scores plot from principal component analysis (PCA) showing clustering of groups based on quantitative variances of annotated metabolites. 95% confidence intervals are displayed for each group. B, Volcano plot of –log(P‐value) and log2(fold‐change) values for all annotated metabolites. Metabolites that were significantly higher (red), lower (green), or not different (black open circles) in ITD + RH group as compared to ITD + RH + glucose group. C, Pathway and enrichment analysis for significantly altered metabolites in ITD + RH group as compared to ITD + RH + glucose group. Higher pathway impact value indicates greater centrality or importance in that particular pathway. Dashed lines display significance cutoffs (see text). G, S + T = glycine, serine and threonine; A, D + E = alanine, aspartate and glutamate. D, Enrichment analysis for metabolite sets based on normal metabolic function. Fold enrichment values indicate whether metabolites appear more than expected by random chance (see text for significance cutoffs). Ratios presented next to each bar denote the number of metabolites identified vs the total number of metabolites in that pathway. For example, 4/20 presented next to the urea cycle bar means that 4 metabolites were identified in that pathway of 20 total metabolites
Figure 3Structural similarity network displaying metabolic perturbations in hippocampus of RH‐exposed ITD rats. Metabolites are linked based on structural similarity of PubChem substructure fingerprints. Shape denotes chemical class from KEGG Compound. Relative abundance in ITD + RH is represented by color, with respect to ITD + RH + glucose. This graphic serves as a comprehensive visualization of the identified metabolic changes
Figure 4The hippocampal levels of (A) glycolysis, (B) citric acid, and (C) urea cycle intermediate in ITD + RH + glucose (n = 10) and ITD + RH (n = 9) groups. It should be noted that the values for some of the metabolites are not presented on bar graphs as either our method was not been able to detect levels of those missing metabolites or those metabolites are not yet annotated. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.005
Figure 5A, B, The substrate kinetic properties (V max and K m) of hippocampal hexokinase in ITD + RH + glucose (n = 6) and ITD + RH (n = 7) groups. C, D, The substrate kinetic properties (V max and K m) of hippocampal phosphofructokinase in ITD + RH + glucose (n = 6) and ITD + RH (n = 5–6) groups. E, F, The substrate kinetic properties (Vmax and Km) of hippocampal pyruvate kinase in ITD + RH + glucose (n = 7) and ITD + RH (n = 5‐6) groups. *P < 0.05, and ***P < 0.005