| Literature DB >> 31281895 |
Yi Zhang1,2, Aaron D Mickle3,4, Philipp Gutruf5,2, Lisa A McIlvried3,4, Hexia Guo2, Yixin Wu2, Judith P Golden3,4, Yeguang Xue6,7, Jose G Grajales-Reyes3,4, Xueju Wang8, Siddharth Krishnan2, Yiwen Xie2, Dongsheng Peng2,9, Chun-Ju Su2, Fengyi Zhang10, Jonathan T Reeder2, Sherri K Vogt3,4, Yonggang Huang2,6,7, John A Rogers2,11,12,13,14,15, Robert W Gereau3,4,16.
Abstract
Studies of the peripheral nervous system rely on controlled manipulation of neuronal function with pharmacologic and/or optogenetic techniques. Traditional hardware for these purposes can cause notable damage to fragile nerve tissues, create irritation at the biotic/abiotic interface, and alter the natural behaviors of animals. Here, we present a wireless, battery-free device that integrates a microscale inorganic light-emitting diode and an ultralow-power microfluidic system with an electrochemical pumping mechanism in a soft platform that can be mounted onto target peripheral nerves for programmed delivery of light and/or pharmacological agents in freely moving animals. Biocompliant designs lead to minimal effects on overall nerve health and function, even with chronic use in vivo. The small size and light weight construction allow for deployment as fully implantable devices in mice. These features create opportunities for studies of the peripheral nervous system outside of the scope of those possible with existing technologies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31281895 PMCID: PMC6611690 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw5296
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.957
Fig. 1Wireless, battery-free neural cuff for programmable pharmacology and optogenetics.
(A and B) Demonstrations of the overall size of the system. Scale bars, 5 mm. (C and D) Magnified views of the neural cuff interface with optical μ-ILED activation and fluid delivery. Scale bars, 1 mm. Exploded view (E) and electrical schematic diagram (F) of the wireless optofluidic system for programmable pharmacology and optogenetics. μC, microcontroller.
Fig. 2Fluidic and electrical characteristics of the wireless optofluidic system.
(A and B) Top: Schematic diagram of the electrochemical micropump. Applying current to a pair of electrodes initiates pumping through expansion induced by electrochemical phase change of liquid water into hydrogen and oxygen gases. The resulting pressure in the micropump chamber deforms the flexible membrane and delivers the drug. Bottom: Images of mechanical deformation of the flexible membrane induced by water electrolysis. Scale bar, 0.3 mm. (C) Fluid volume in the drug reservoir as a function of time. (D) Comparison between experiment and modeling of maximum displacement of flexible membrane induced by water electrolysis. (E) Current-voltage-power characteristics of the electrochemical micropump. (F) Total infusion efficiency from various loaded volumes in representative devices (n = 3 devices). (G) Flow rate in a microfluidic channel as a function of time. (H) Temperature of the drug chamber (top) and micropump chamber (bottom) during the electrochemical pumping process (3 V). All data are represented as means ± SEM.
Fig. 3Implantation of the battery-free optofluidic nerve cuff system and its impact on animal behavior and nerve health.
(A) Detailed illustration of the optofluidic nerve cuff system and cuff interface with the mouse sciatic nerve. (B) Demonstration of both optical stimulation and fluid delivery to the sciatic nerve. Scale bar, 2 mm. (C) Mouse chronically implanted with the wirelessly powered optofluidic nerve cuff system. (D) Characterization of effects of device implantation on rotarod performance compared to PE cuff and sham surgery [n = 9 to 10; ***P < 0.001 PE cuff versus sham and device, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)]. Mouse gait parameters including maximum contact mean intensity (E), swing time (F), and print area (G) are significantly impaired after PE cuff implantation but not after optofluidic cuff implantation compared to sham surgery (n = 8 to 10; ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, and *P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison). Representative hematoxylin and eosin images (H) and quantification of infiltrating immune cells (I) from the sciatic nerve comparing sham, device, and PE cuff after 2 weeks (w) of implantation demonstrating an absence of infiltrating immune cells in sciatic nerves of mice implanted with the device compared to PE cuff implantation. Scale bars, 25 μm. n = 3; ***P < 0.001, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison. AU, arbitrary units.
Fig. 4Demonstration of optogenetic and microfluidic capabilities of the wireless, battery-free optofluidic nerve cuff system.
(A) Schematic of the real-time place preference assay designed to test the capabilities of nerve cuff optical stimulation. Representative heat maps (B) and quantification (C) of blue light stimulation of sciatic nerve in wild-type and TRPV1-ChR2 mice. Mice were placed in the chamber for a total of 20 min. TRPV1-ChR2 mice displayed significant aversion to 1-Hz light pulse stimulus compared to wild-type mice (n = 9 to 10; *P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). (D) Optofluidic cuff devices loaded with bupivacaine and saline were implanted in mice, and thermal sensitivity was assayed before and after saline and again after bupivacaine infusion. (E) Quantification of the withdrawal latency to thermal stimulation of the ipsilateral (device side) and contralateral paw at baseline, after saline and after bupivacaine (n = 5 to 6; *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01, one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test).