| Literature DB >> 31281364 |
F Feliatra1, Rizki Hamdani1, Iesye Lukystyowati2, Irvina Nurachmi3.
Abstract
The high rate of bacterial diseases in fishes and shrimps has lead scientists seek for natural antibiotic products that would act as a solution. An example of this product is the secondary metabolic products from heterotrophic bacteria. These bacteria could easily be found in many water regions and estuaries, including the Siak District, Riau, Indonesia. Therefore, this study aims at determining the ability of bacterial isolates in inhibiting the growth of pathogens (Vibrio alginolyticus, Aeromonas hydrophila, and Pseudomonas sp.). The research was conducted from June to September 2018. It actuates the type of heterotrophic bacteria in the sampling area using the PCR technique. The phylogenetic structure of bacterial isolates obtained during this study was assessed by nucleotide sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. The antagonism test showed that bacteria had the ability to inhibit the growth of pathogens (Vibrio alginolyticus, Aeromonas hydrophila, and Pseudomonas sp.). The results showed that 25 pure bacterial isolates were obtained, in which 10 of those were carried out by DNA sequencing; hence, it could be used as antimicrobes. Based on the analysis of 16S rDNA, 10 isolates were identified: 6 were Bacillus cereus and 2 were Pseudomonas aeruginosa with homology levels ranging from 97 to 99%, while the remaining two were suspected as the new species of isolates. From the result, it could be concluded that heterotrophic bacteria are found to be better used as antipathogens against Vibrio alginolitycus than hydrophila and Pseudomonas sp.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31281364 PMCID: PMC6590592 DOI: 10.1155/2019/7456410
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Microbiol
Figure 1Research location map.
Morphology of heterotrophic bacterial isolates.
| Station | Isolate name | Diameter (cm) | Colony color | Colony shape | Edges | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2 | 0.6 | Milky white | Round | Slippery | Embossed |
| 1 | H4 | 1.5 | Milky white | Round | Slippery | Embossed |
| 1 | H8 | 0.5 | Milky white | Round | Slippery | Embossed |
| 1 | H9 | 0.5 | Milky white | Round | Slippery | Embossed |
| 2 | H10 | 0.8 | Yellowish white | Round | Slippery | Flat |
| 2 | H12 | 1 | Yellowish white | Round | Wavy | Flat |
| 2 | H15 | 0.8 | Milky white | Round with a coral edge | Irregular | Convex |
| 2 | H16 | 0.8 | Milky white | Round | Slippery | Flat |
| 2 | H17 | 1 | Milky white | Round | Slippery | Embossed |
| 2 | H24 | 0.7 | Milky white | Round | Slippery | Embossed |
Biochemical test of each isolate.
| Biochemical test | Sample code | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2 | H4 | H8 | H9 | H10 | H12 | H15 | H16 | H17 | H24 | |
| Gram | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + |
| Catalase | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Motility | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Indole | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| H2S | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | − |
| MR | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | − |
| Citrate | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| TSIA | ||||||||||
| T | M | M | M | M | M | M | M | M | M | M |
| M1 | M | M | M | M | M | M | K | M | M | K |
| Sugar test | ||||||||||
| Glucose | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | + |
| Lactose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Sucrose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
MR: methyl red test; −: negative; +: positive; T: upright; M1: tilt; K: yellow; M: red.
Antagonism test results of bacterial isolates against pathogenic bacteria.
| Bacterial isolates test | Diameter of the inhibition zone (mm) | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| (+) |
|
|
|
| (+) |
|
|
|
| (+) |
|
|
|
| |
| H2 | 6 | 14 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 4 | 7 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.7 | 5 | 7 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 7 |
| H4 | 3.5 | 11 | 12.5 | 14.5 | 12.6 | 3.5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1.7 | 3 | 5 | 12.5 | 11 | 9.5 |
| H8 | 7.5 | 12 | 11 | 11.5 | 11.5 | 7 | 11 | 6 | 4.5 | 7.2 | 6 | 6 | 10.5 | 11 | 9.2 |
| H9 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2.3 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 5 | 4.5 | 5 | 2 | 6.5 | 7 | 5.5 | 6.3 |
| H10 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 7 | 6 | 5.5 | 6.2 | 7 | 7.5 | 8 | 9.5 | 8.3 |
| H12 | 6 | 15 | 16.5 | 14.5 | 15.3 | 10 | 5.5 | 3.5 | 4 | 4.3 | 2 | 11.5 | 6 | 7 | 8.2 |
| H15 | 7 | 13 | 9.5 | 9 | 10.5 | 7.5 | 4 | 2 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5.5 | 5.2 |
| H16 | 3.5 | 8 | 13 | 9 | 10 | 2 | 5.5 | 5 | 7 | 5.8 | 3 | 9.5 | 6 | 7 | 7.5 |
| H17 | 4 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 9.7 | 8 | 7 | 4.5 | 5 | 5.5 | 6 | 7.5 | 11 | 6.5 | 8.3 |
| H24 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 2.3 | 5 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 9.5 | 6.8 |
U = repetition; R = average.
Figure 2Sensitivity analysis results.
BLAST results (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool).
| Isolate | Species | Strain | Access code | Homology (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2 |
| DP5 | KX453268.1 | 81 |
| H4 |
| BF2 | JF322796.1 | 98 |
| H8 |
| ALK320 | KC456535.1 | 99 |
| H9 |
| no31 | KY819017.1 | 99 |
| H10 |
| SN7 | KM489154.1 | 91 |
| H12 |
| LOCK 1002 | KT728833.1 | 99 |
| H15 |
| SBABrB5 | LC189361.1 | 98 |
| H16 |
| S2QPS8 | HQ844502.1 | 99 |
| H17 |
| DFT-5 | KY750689.1 | 99 |
| H24 |
| KES7 | KP202304.1 | 97 |
Figure 3Ten isolates of the phylogenetic tree.