Literature DB >> 31280380

Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation.

Zeynep Hazar Kanik1,2, Omer Osman Pala3, Gul Oznur Karabicak4, Seyit Citaker5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) is a joint-specific, self-administered outcome measure used to determine the level of pain and disability in patients with various elbow pathologies. The aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the PREE into Turkish (PREE-T) and to test its reliability and validity.
METHODS: Fifty-nine patients with elbow disorders were included in the present study. The original version of the PREE was translated and culturally adapted into Turkish by following standard procedure. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were determined using intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha, respectively. Construct validity of PREE-T was determined with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires by using Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis. Floor and ceiling effects were also analyzed.
RESULTS: A high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.959) and an excellent test-retest reliability (the intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.970) indicated that the PREE-T was reliable. Neither floor nor ceiling effects were observed in sub-parameters (0-1.7%) and the total score (0%) of PREE-T. Correlation coefficients between the PREE-T total score and DASH disability/symptom and work sub-parameters were 0.636 and 0.461, respectively. PREE-T pain and function sub-parameters correlated with related sub-parameters of the SF-36 bodily pain (r = - 0.721) and physical functioning (r = - 0.263).
CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of the PREE is a valid and reliable outcome measure for assessing patients with elbow disorders. It is recommended to be used in research and clinical settings. Key Points • The Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation was successfully translated into Turkish and validated in a population with various elbow pathologies according to established guidelines • The Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation has high internal consistency and test-retest values • The Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation is valid and reliable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elbow; Outcome measure; Reliability; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31280380     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-019-04665-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  15 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.

Authors:  D E Beaton; C Bombardier; F Guillemin; M B Ferraz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Reliability and construct validity of the SF-36 in Turkish cancer patients.

Authors:  Rukiye Pinar
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Rating systems for evaluation of the elbow.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Francesco Franceschi; Mattia Loppini; Nicola Maffulli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 4.291

5.  Translation and validation of the PREE (Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation) to a French version.

Authors:  G Beauchemin; J C MacDermid; K Bourduas; M-F Poirier; C Gaudelli; D M Rouleau
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 2.256

6.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Functional rating index: a new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions.

Authors:  R J Feise; J Michael Menke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Outcome evaluation in patients with elbow pathology: issues in instrument development and evaluation.

Authors:  J C MacDermid
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.950

9.  Validity and sensitivity to change of patient-reported pain and disability measures for elbow pathologies.

Authors:  Joshua I Vincent; Joy C MacDermid; Graham J King; Ruby Grewal
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.751

10.  Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the patient-rated elbow evaluation.

Authors:  Tadamasa Hanyu; Mikihiko Watanabe; Takashi Masatomi; Keiichiro Nishida; Teruhiko Nakagawa; Yasumasa Nishiura; Hiroyuki Ohi
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 1.601

View more
  1 in total

1.  Factor Analysis and Psychometric Properties Adaption of Chinese Version of the Decisional Engagement Scale (DES-10).

Authors:  Feijie Wang; Lijie Huang; Hongmei Zhang; Hongxia Jiang; Xiaoxia Chang; Yinping Chu; Zhixia Wang; Xiaoli Zhang
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.711

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.