Literature DB >> 31279972

Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion for persistent atrial fibrillation: VENUS and MARS clinical trial design.

Miguel Valderrábano1, Leif E Peterson2, Raquel Bunge2, Michelle Prystash2, Amish S Dave2, Sherif Nagueh2, Neal S Kleiman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is effective in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), its success rates in persistent AF are suboptimal. Ablation strategies to improve outcomes including additional lesions beyond PVI have not consistently shown benefit. Recurrence as perimitral flutter (PMF) is a common form of ablation failure. The vein of Marshall (VOM) contains myocardial connections and abundant sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation implicated in the genesis and maintenance of AF, and is anatomically co-localized with the mitral isthmus, the ablation target of PMF. VOM ethanol infusion is effective in targeting these arrhythmia substrates.
OBJECTIVE: To test the safety and efficacy of VOM ethanol infusion when added to PVI in patients undergoing either de novo ablation of persistent AF or after a previous ablation failure. STUDY
DESIGN: VENUS-AF and MARS-AF are prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trials. VENUS-AF will enroll patients undergoing their first catheter ablation of persistent AF. MARS-AF will enroll patients undergoing ablation after previous ablation failure(s). Patients (n = 405) will be randomized to PVI alone or in combination with VOM ethanol infusion. The primary endpoints include procedural safety and freedom from AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) of more than 30 seconds on 30-day continuous event monitors at 6 and 12 months after randomization procedure (single-procedure success), off antiarrhythmic drugs. Key secondary endpoints include AF burden, freedom from AF/AT after repeat procedures and quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: The VENUS-AF and MARS-AF will determine the safety and potential rhythm control benefit of VOM ethanol infusion when added to PVI in patients with persistent AF undergoing de novo or repeat ablation, respectively.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31279972      PMCID: PMC6692654          DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.04.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  45 in total

1.  The ligament of Marshall: a structural analysis in human hearts with implications for atrial arrhythmias.

Authors:  D T Kim; A C Lai; C Hwang; L T Fan; H S Karagueuzian; P S Chen; M C Fishbein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Catheter ablation of permanent atrial fibrillation: medium term results.

Authors:  M J Earley; D J R Abrams; A D Staniforth; S C Sporton; R J Schilling
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-08-23       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Pulmonary vein antrum isolation: intracardiac echocardiography-guided technique.

Authors:  Atul Verma; Nassir F Marrouche; Andrea Natale
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-11

4.  Catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: clinical outcome and mechanisms of subsequent arrhythmias.

Authors:  Michel Haïssaguerre; Mélèze Hocini; Prashanthan Sanders; Frederic Sacher; Martin Rotter; Yoshihide Takahashi; Thomas Rostock; Li-Fern Hsu; Pierre Bordachar; Sylvain Reuter; Raymond Roudaut; Jacques Clémenty; Pierre Jaïs
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-11

5.  Catheter ablation of atypical atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia within the coronary sinus after left atrial ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Aman Chugh; Hakan Oral; Eric Good; Jihn Han; Kamala Tamirisa; Kristina Lemola; Darryl Elmouchi; David Tschopp; Scott Reich; Petar Igic; Frank Bogun; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Vein of marshall cannulation for the analysis of electrical activity in patients with focal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  C Hwang; T J Wu; R N Doshi; C T Peter; P S Chen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-04-04       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical significance of macroreentrant atrial tachycardia during and following left atrial ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Aman Chugh; Hakan Oral; Kristina Lemola; Burr Hall; Peter Cheung; Eric Good; Kamala Tamirisa; Jihn Han; Frank Bogun; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.343

8.  Technique and results of linear ablation at the mitral isthmus.

Authors:  Pierre Jaïs; Mélèze Hocini; Li-Fern Hsu; Prashanthan Sanders; Christophe Scavee; Rukshen Weerasooriya; Laurent Macle; Florence Raybaud; Stéphane Garrigue; Dipen C Shah; Philippe Le Metayer; Jacques Clémenty; Michel Haïssaguerre
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Prevention of iatrogenic atrial tachycardia after ablation of atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study comparing circumferential pulmonary vein ablation with a modified approach.

Authors:  Carlo Pappone; Francesco Manguso; Gabriele Vicedomini; Filippo Gugliotta; Ornella Santinelli; Amedeo Ferro; Simone Gulletta; Simone Sala; Nicoleta Sora; Gabriele Paglino; Giuseppe Augello; Eustachio Agricola; Alberto Zangrillo; Ottavio Alfieri; Vincenzo Santinelli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Left atrial tachycardia after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation: incidence, electrophysiological characteristics, and results of radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Isabel Deisenhofer; Heidi Estner; Bernhard Zrenner; Juergen Schreieck; Sonja Weyerbrock; Gabriele Hessling; Konstanze Scharf; Martin R Karch; Claus Schmitt
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.214

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Randall K Wolf
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2021-03-25

Review 2.  Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion.

Authors:  Adi Lador; Miguel Valderrábano
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2021-03-25

3.  Effect of Catheter Ablation With Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion vs Catheter Ablation Alone on Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The VENUS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Miguel Valderrábano; Leif E Peterson; Vijay Swarup; Paul A Schurmann; Akash Makkar; Rahul N Doshi; David DeLurgio; Charles A Athill; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Andrea Natale; Jayanthi Koneru; Amish S Dave; Irakli Giorgberidze; Hamid Afshar; Michelle L Guthrie; Raquel Bunge; Carlos A Morillo; Neal S Kleiman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: From concept to clinical practice.

Authors:  Miguel Valderrábano
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 6.779

5.  Determinants of outcome impact of vein of Marshall ethanol infusion when added to catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: A secondary analysis of the VENUS randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Adi Lador; Leif E Peterson; Vijay Swarup; Paul A Schurmann; Akash Makkar; Rahul N Doshi; David DeLurgio; Charles A Athill; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Andrea Natale; Jayanthi Koneru; Amish S Dave; Irakli Giorgberidze; Hamid Afshar; Michelle L Guthrie; Raquel Bunge; Carlos A Morillo; Neal S Kleiman; Miguel Valderrábano
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 6.779

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.