Literature DB >> 31279618

Global Left Ventricular Myocardial Work Efficiency in Healthy Individuals and Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.

Mohammed El Mahdiui1, Pieter van der Bijl1, Rachid Abou1, Nina Ajmone Marsan1, Victoria Delgado1, Jeroen J Bax2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Global left ventricular (LV) myocardial work efficiency, the ratio of constructive to wasted work in all LV segments, reflects the efficiency by which mechanical energy is expended during the cardiac cycle. Global LV myocardial work efficiency can be derived from LV pressure-strain loop analysis incorporating both noninvasively estimated blood pressure recordings and echocardiographic strain data. The aim of this study was to characterize global LV myocardial work efficiency in healthy individuals and patients with cardiovascular (CV) risk factors or overt cardiac disease.
METHODS: We retrospectively included healthy individuals without structural heart disease or CV risk factors, who were selected from an ongoing database of normal individuals, and matched for age and sex with (1) individuals without structural heart disease but with CV risk factors, (2) postinfarct patients without heart failure, and (3) heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Global LV myocardial work efficiency was estimated with a proprietary algorithm from speckle-tracking strain analyses, as well as noninvasive blood pressure measurements.
RESULTS: In total, 120 individuals (44% male, 53 ± 13 years) were included (n = 30 per group). In healthy individuals without structural heart disease or CV risk factors, global LV myocardial work efficiency was 96.0% (interquartile range, 95.0%-96.3%). Myocardial efficiency of the LV did not differ significantly between individuals without structural heart disease and those with CV risk factors (96.0% vs 96.0%; P = .589). Global LV myocardial work efficiency, however, was significantly decreased in postinfarct patients (96.0% vs 93.0%, P < .001) and in those with HFrEF (96.0% vs 69.0%; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: While global LV myocardial work efficiency was similar in normal individuals and in those with CV risk factors, it was decreased in postinfarct and HFrEF patients. The global LV myocardial work efficiency values presented here show distinct patterns in different cardiac pathologies.
Copyright © 2019 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular disease; Left ventricle pressure strain loop; Myocardial work efficiency; Noninvasive myocardial work; Normal population; Reference values

Year:  2019        PMID: 31279618     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  21 in total

1.  Value of territorial work efficiency estimation in non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome: a study with non-invasive left ventricular pressure-strain loops.

Authors:  YunYun Qin; XiaoPeng Wu; JiangTao Wang; YiDan Li; XueYan Ding; DiChen Guo; Zhe Jiang; WeiWei Zhu; QiZhe Cai; XiuZhang Lu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Quantitative assessment of left ventricular myocardial work in chronic kidney disease patients by a novel non-invasive pressure-strain loop analysis method.

Authors:  Feng-Zhen Liu; Xiao-Lin Wang; Chun-Quan Zhang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Right Ventricular Pump Efficiency in Secundum-Type Atrial Septal Defect.

Authors:  Wei-Tsung Lai; Ho-Ping Yu; Chang-Chyi Lin; Wei-Hsian Yin; Tsung-Yu Ko; Juey-Jen Hwang; Lung-Chun Lin; Kuan-Chih Huang
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 2.672

4.  The Utility of Circulating and Imaging Biomarkers Alone and in Combination in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Biyanka Jaltotage; Girish Dwivedi; Daryl Eng Lee Ooi; Gnanadevan Mahadavan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2021

5.  Value of quantitative analysis of left ventricular systolic function in patients on maintenance hemodialysis based on myocardial work technique.

Authors:  Chang Liu; Yi-Ping Feng; Zi-Ning Yan; Li Fan; Yi-Fei Rui; Ling Cui
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Impact of blood pressure changes on myocardial work indices in hypertensive patients in a day.

Authors:  Xinhao Li; Quande Liu; Wuyun Bao; Mengmeng Li; Yu Zhang; Xiaoyu Wan; Mei Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  A Prospective Comparative Study on Cardiac Alterations After Surgery and Drug Treatment of Primary Aldosteronism.

Authors:  Yi-Lin Chen; Ting-Yan Xu; Jian-Zhong Xu; Li-Min Zhu; Yan Li; Ji-Guang Wang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 5.555

8.  Myocardial Work Assessment for the Prediction of Prognosis in Advanced Heart Failure.

Authors:  Felix Hedwig; Olena Nemchyna; Julia Stein; Christoph Knosalla; Nicolas Merke; Fabian Knebel; Andreas Hagendorff; Felix Schoenrath; Volkmar Falk; Jan Knierim
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-06-18

9.  Myocardial Work Efficiency, A Novel Measure of Myocardial Dysfunction, Is Reduced in COVID-19 Patients and Associated With In-Hospital Mortality.

Authors:  Anum S Minhas; Nisha A Gilotra; Erin Goerlich; Thomas Metkus; Brian T Garibaldi; Garima Sharma; Nicole Bavaro; Susan Phillip; Erin D Michos; Allison G Hays
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-06-14

10.  Evaluation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Work Performance in Patients Undergoing On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.

Authors:  Konstantina Spetsotaki; Rashad Zayat; Srinath Donuru; Ruediger Autschbach; Heike Schnoering; Nima Hatam
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 1.520

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.