| Literature DB >> 31278891 |
Jared J Homola1,2, Cynthia S Loftin3, Kristina M Cammen4, Caren C Helbing5, Inanc Birol6, Thomas F Schultz7, Michael T Kinnison1.
Abstract
Native species that persist in urban environments may benefit from local adaptation to novel selection factors. We used double-digest restriction-side associated DNA (RAD) sequencing to evaluate shifts in genome-wide genetic diversity and investigate the presence of parallel evolution associated with urban-specific selection factors in wood frogs (Lithobates sylvaticus). Our replicated paired study design involved 12 individuals from each of 4 rural and urban populations to improve our confidence that detected signals of selection are indeed associated with urbanization. Genetic diversity measures were less for urban populations; however, the effect size was small, suggesting little biological consequence. Using an FST outlier approach, we identified 37 of 8344 genotyped single nucleotide polymorphisms with consistent evidence of directional selection across replicates. A genome-wide association study analysis detected modest support for an association between environment type and 12 of the 37 FST outlier loci. Discriminant analysis of principal components using the 37 FST outlier loci produced correct reassignment for 87.5% of rural samples and 93.8% of urban samples. Eighteen of the 37 FST outlier loci mapped to the American bullfrog (Rana [Lithobates] catesbeiana) genome, although none were in coding regions. This evidence of parallel evolution to urban environments provides a powerful example of the ability of urban landscapes to direct evolutionary processes. © The American Genetic Association 2019.Entities:
Keywords: Molecular adaptation and selection; RAD-seq; amphibian; anthropogenic evolution; rapid evolution; urban ecology; vernal pool
Year: 2019 PMID: 31278891 PMCID: PMC6785938 DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esz041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hered ISSN: 0022-1503 Impact factor: 2.645
Figure 1.Map of wood frog sampling sites located in Maine, USA. The replicated paired sampling design includes 4 rural (R1–R4) and 4 urban (U1–U4) sites, with sample collection site indicated by a white dot.
Site locations and characteristics for 8 sampled wood frog populations
| Replicate | Urban/rural | Latitude | Longitude | % Impervious | % Canopy cover | Dist. to road (m) | % Developed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rural | 44.8876 | −68.7826 | 5 | 60 | 417 | 8 |
| 2 | Rural | 43.9355 | −70.0082 | 3 | 59 | 358 | 10 |
| 3 | Rural | 43.8005 | −70.1331 | 4 | 46 | 172 | 27 |
| 4 | Rural | 43.2808 | −70.6904 | 3 | 75 | 275 | 8 |
| 1 | Urban | 44.8021 | −68.7886 | 48 | 22 | 39 | 98 |
| 2 | Urban | 43.9168 | −69.9847 | 23 | 41 | 83 | 64 |
| 3 | Urban | 43.8123 | −70.1767 | 19 | 48 | 57 | 52 |
| 4 | Urban | 43.3199 | −70.5947 | 18 | 59 | 158 | 43 |
Figure 2.Plot of first 2 principal component axes that explain a total of 95.97% of environmental variation for 4 rural and 4 urban wood frog sampling sites based on 4 urbanization-associated characteristics. Factor loadings are provided in the inset table.
Results of sensitivity analysis on 3 assembly parameters in Stacks
| Parameters | Total loci | Loci w/ SNPs (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| 7 | 4 | 1 | 835 153 | 146 972 (17.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 199 056 | 171 016 (14.2) |
| 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 687 085 | 234 005 (13.9) |
| 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 725 367 | 223 881 (12.9) |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 833 950 | 198 692 (10.8) |
Selected parameter settings for analysis are indicated in bold.
aMinimum number of identical, raw reads required to create a stack.
bNumber of mismatches allowed between loci when processing a single individual.
cNumber of mismatches allowed between loci when building the catalog.
Figure 3.Results of discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) to analyze the neutral and putatively adaptive genetic variation for 8 wood frog populations (N = 12 each). Analyses included 8307 neutral (nonoutlier) loci, and individuals are coded for their (a) population and (b) replicate and population of origin. Panel c shows the first discriminant axis for all 96 individuals across the 37 loci with evidence of selection plotted based on their rural (blue) and urban (red) cluster assignments, and panel d shows the locus-specific loading plot of the analysis depicted in panel c. See online version for full color.
F ST values from each of 4 paired replicates that include 1 urban and 1 rural wood frog sampling site
| Rep. 1 | Rep. 2 | Rep. 3 | Rep. 4 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urban | Rural | Urban | Rural | Urban | Rural | Urban | Rural | ||
| Rep. 1 | Urban | — |
| 0.046 | 0.048 | 0.053 | 0.053 | 0.061 | 0.060 |
| Rural | — | 0.039 | 0.040 | 0.045 | 0.045 | 0.054 | 0.052 | ||
| Rep. 2 | Urban | — |
| 0.033 | 0.033 | 0.038 | 0.037 | ||
| Rural | — | 0.033 | 0.032 | 0.036 | 0.036 | ||||
| Rep. 3 | Urban | — |
| 0.040 | 0.038 | ||||
| Rural | — | 0.040 | 0.038 | ||||||
| Rep. 4 | Urban | — |
| ||||||
| Rural | — | ||||||||
Bold values highlight within-replicate FST values.
Genetic diversity measures for 12 individuals sequenced at each site for nucleotide positions present in at least 6 of 8 wood frog populations, including mean ± standard error for each measure within rural and urban categories
| Replicate | Urban/rural | Sitesa | % Polymorphicb | % Privatec |
|
| π f |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rural | 14779 | 0.489 | 0.028 | 0.874 | 0.163 | 0.163 |
| 2 | Rural | 12813 | 0.558 | 0.043 | 0.870 | 0.161 | 0.180 |
| 3 | Rural | 10026 | 0.526 | 0.047 | 0.870 | 0.161 | 0.175 |
| 4 | Rural | 14669 | 0.630 | 0.071 | 0.851 | 0.187 | 0.201 |
| 1 | Urban | 14821 | 0.453 | 0.019 | 0.847 | 0.157 | 0.155 |
| 2 | Urban | 13502 | 0.558 | 0.039 | 0.868 | 0.167 | 0.181 |
| 3 | Urban | 14413 | 0.547 | 0.040 | 0.866 | 0.170 | 0.180 |
| 4 | Urban | 14661 | 0.601 | 0.052 | 0.854 | 0.181 | 0.194 |
| Mean | Rural | 13071 ± 1111 | 0.551 ± 0.030 | 0.047 ± 0.009 | 0.867 ± 0.005 | 0.168 ± 0.006 | 0.180 ± 0.008 |
| Urban | 13082 ± 1116 | 0.542 ± 0.037 | 0.045 ± 0.011 | 0.860 ± 0.006 | 0.167 ± 0.007 | 0.178 ± 0.009 |
aNumber of polymorphic nucleotide sites.
bPercent of polymorphic sites.
cPercent of variable sites with unique alleles to each population.
dAverage frequency of the major allele.
eAverage observed heterozygosity per locus.
fAverage nucleotide diversity.
Figure 4.Distribution of (a) mean FST percentiles for 8344 wood frog loci with standard error bars depicting variation among 4 population replicates and (b) the same mean percentile values for each locus plotted based on their ranked order and showing a sharp increase for a subset of loci with relatively high average FST values. Points and bars with black coloration indicate loci with high mean FST percentiles and low variation among replicates, suggesting evidence of selection.
Figure 5.Variation in genotype frequency for 12 loci with evidence of selection due to the influence of urbanization based on FST outlier and GWAS analyses. The top and bottom of each box are the 25th and 75th percentiles, the band within each box is the median value, whiskers represent overall variation, and points are possible outliers beyond 1.5× observed interquartile range.