| Literature DB >> 31278857 |
Markus B Heckmann1,2, Belal Totakhel1,2, Daniel Finke1,2, Markus S Anker3,4,5, Carsten Müller-Tidow6, Uwe Haberkorn7,8, Hugo A Katus1,2, Lorenz H Lehmann1,2.
Abstract
AIMS: Our aim was to investigate the glucose uptake in cancer patients suffering from different entities, using 18 F-FDG positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans. We further aimed at identifying potential variables altering cardiac and skeletal muscle glucose metabolism. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: 18F-FDG; Cachexia; Cardio-oncology; Glucose metabolism; Hodgkin's lymphoma; PET-CT
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31278857 PMCID: PMC6676298 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12475
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ESC Heart Fail ISSN: 2055-5822
Figure 1FDG positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET‐CT) functionality and exemplary images. In the heart, FDG is absorbed like glucose and phosphorylated by hexokinase (A). Phosphorylated FDG does not enter glycolysis and cannot leave the cell via GLUT transporters (metabolic trap). Beta‐decay converts FDG to glucose (B). The subsequent annihilation reaction creates a gamma ray, which is detected by the PET scanner. Low‐dose CT scans are used for image fusion (C, E). Fused images including PET and CT (C, E) information are depicted in (D) and (F). High signal density is coloured in red, and low signal density is coloured in blue and green. (C) and (D) are taken from a Hodgkin's lymphoma patient, and (E) and (F) are taken from a non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma patient. Note the higher signal density in the left ventricle of a Hodgkin's lymphoma patient (D vs. F). SUV, standardized uptake value.
Study population
| HL ( | NHL ( | No lymphoma ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male sex | 62% | 72% | 61% | |||
| Age | 40 ± 15 | 50 ± 17 | 64 ± 13 |
|
|
|
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.11 ± 5.01 | 25.99 ± 7.67 | 25.88 ± 4.64 | |||
| Prior chemotherapy | 98% | 93% | 36% |
|
| |
| Doxorubicin dose (mg/m2) | 179 ± 143 | 220 ± 113 | NA | |||
| Prior radiotherapy | 23% | 40% | 57% |
| ||
| Serum glucose levels (mmol/L) | 5.6 ± 1.7 | 5.4 ± 1.1 | 6.0 ± 1.3 |
| ||
| Diabetes mellitus | 6% | 12% | 16% | |||
| Serum creatinine levels (μmol/L) | 72 ± 22 | 72 ± 18 | 79 ± 31 | |||
| Glomerular filtration rate (mL/min * 1.73 m2) | 111 ± 18 | 101 ± 20 | 85 ± 20 |
|
| |
| Increased TSH (>4.0 mU/L) | 4.3% | 11.5% | 24.3% |
|
BMI, body mass index; HL, Hodgkin's lymphoma; NHL, non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma; TSH, thyroid‐stimulating hormone.
Continuous data are reported as mean ± standard deviation. Count data are reported as percentages. Statistics: Tukey's honest significance test was used for continuous data, and Yates's χ 2 test was used for count data applying Holm's method for P‐value adjustment.
P < 0.05 (HL vs. NHL).
P < 0.01 (HL vs. NHL).
P < 0.001 (HL vs. NHL).
P < 0.05 (HL vs. no lymphoma).
P < 0.01 (HL vs. no lymphoma).
P < 0.001 (HL vs. no lymphoma).
P < 0.05 (NHL vs. no lymphoma).
P < 0.01 (NHL vs. no lymphoma).
P < 0.001 (NHL vs. no lymphoma).
Figure 2Univariate logistic regression analyses on cardiac and gluteal FDG uptake. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals and P‐values are depicted for higher cardiac (left) or gluteal (right) 18F‐FDG absorption. Serum glucose levels above 5.5 mmol/L were significantly associated with lower absorption rates in both cardiac and skeletal muscle, while Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) was only associated with an increase in cardiac absorption. BMI, body mass index; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; NHL, non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma; TSH, thyroid‐stimulating hormone.
Figure 3Multivariate logistic regression analyses on cardiac (A) and gluteal (B) FDG uptake. Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) was significantly associated with high FDG absorption, while non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) did not differ significantly from non‐lymphatic cancer. High serum glucose levels and prior chemotherapy were both associated with a significant decrease in cardiac FDG uptake. Interestingly, prior chemotherapy did not influence FDG uptake in skeletal muscle to the same extent. Obesity and older age were both significantly associated with decreased gluteal FDG uptake. Variables were selected in a step‐down approach using Akaike's information criterion. BMI, body mass index; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; OR, odds ratio.