AIMS: To assess hyperreflective foci (HF) number in angioid streaks (AS) by means of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). METHODS: Observational and cross-sectional study. Sixty-two eyes with AS and 62 controls underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fundoscopy, and SD-OCT. HF were assessed on the horizontal scan of a six-line radial OCT, in the fovea (1500-μm diameter) and parafovea (500 μm external to the fovea), and sub-classified as retinal or choroidal, small or large. Eyes were distributed in one of four groups, as carrying foveal AS without choroidal neovascularization (CNV) (14 eyes), extra-foveal AS without CNV (14), active CNV (20), and inactive CNV (14). Primary outcome was HF assessment in AS. Secondary outcomes included their correlations with BCVA. RESULTS: AS-affected eyes had higher HF numbers. Our sub-analysis revealed that patients with active CNV had a larger number of retinal and choroidal HF than all the other groups, whereas retinal and choroidal foci were significantly increased in inactive CNV only with respect to controls. Interestingly, patients with foveal AS showed HF number increase in the choroid and fovea. BCVA deterioration positively correlated with the total HF number found in the fovea and the choroid. CONCLUSION: HF are significantly increased in patients with AS. Despite being especially evident in active CNV, the increasing number in eyes without CNV might suggest new pathogenetic aspects of the disease.
AIMS: To assess hyperreflective foci (HF) number in angioid streaks (AS) by means of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). METHODS: Observational and cross-sectional study. Sixty-two eyes with AS and 62 controls underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fundoscopy, and SD-OCT. HF were assessed on the horizontal scan of a six-line radial OCT, in the fovea (1500-μm diameter) and parafovea (500 μm external to the fovea), and sub-classified as retinal or choroidal, small or large. Eyes were distributed in one of four groups, as carrying foveal AS without choroidal neovascularization (CNV) (14 eyes), extra-foveal AS without CNV (14), active CNV (20), and inactive CNV (14). Primary outcome was HF assessment in AS. Secondary outcomes included their correlations with BCVA. RESULTS: AS-affected eyes had higher HF numbers. Our sub-analysis revealed that patients with active CNV had a larger number of retinal and choroidal HF than all the other groups, whereas retinal and choroidal foci were significantly increased in inactive CNV only with respect to controls. Interestingly, patients with foveal AS showed HF number increase in the choroid and fovea. BCVA deterioration positively correlated with the total HF number found in the fovea and the choroid. CONCLUSION: HF are significantly increased in patients with AS. Despite being especially evident in active CNV, the increasing number in eyes without CNV might suggest new pathogenetic aspects of the disease.
Authors: Peter Charbel Issa; Robert P Finger; Frank G Holz; Hendrik P N Scholl Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-06-24 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: A Marchese; M Parravano; A Rabiolo; A Carnevali; E Corbelli; M V Cicinelli; M Battaglia Parodi; L Querques; F Bandello; G Querques Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Martin Gliem; Rolf Fimmers; Philipp L Müller; Christian K Brinkmann; Robert P Finger; Doris Hendig; Frank G Holz; Peter Charbel Issa Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-04-13 Impact factor: 5.258