PURPOSE: To analyze the presence of hyperreflective foci in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients, separately, without clinically significant diabetic macular edema and visual impairment. METHODS: Noninvasive, observational prospective study. Seventeen and 19 consecutive Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients (33 and 38 eyes), respectively, were recruited. All patients had no clinically significant diabetic macular edema or visual impairment. Two age- and sex-matched control groups were also included. Patients underwent an ophthalmologic examination including spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Hyperreflective foci were counted considering horizontal B-scan passing through the fovea. RESULTS: On spectral domain optical coherence tomography, patients affected by Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes had a mean of 7.5 ± 4.6 and 9.9 ± 4.5 hyperreflective foci, respectively. Subjects of control groups had a mean of 0.9 ± 0.8 and 1.7 ± 1.5 hyperreflective foci, respectively. Hyperreflective foci amount was statistically different between Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic groups (P = 0.032) and significantly higher in diabetic patients than in controls (P < 0.001). Hyperreflective foci amount was significantly higher in diabetic patients with a poor quality glycometabolic control (P < 0.001 and P = 0.016) or affected by hypertension (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: We reported the presence of hyperreflective foci in diabetic patients without diabetic macular edema and visual impairment. This spectral domain optical coherence tomography finding might be a useful marker for the diagnosis and the follow-up in the early stage of diabetic retinopathy.
PURPOSE: To analyze the presence of hyperreflective foci in Type 1 and Type 2 diabeticpatients, separately, without clinically significant diabetic macular edema and visual impairment. METHODS: Noninvasive, observational prospective study. Seventeen and 19 consecutive Type 1 and Type 2 diabeticpatients (33 and 38 eyes), respectively, were recruited. All patients had no clinically significant diabetic macular edema or visual impairment. Two age- and sex-matched control groups were also included. Patients underwent an ophthalmologic examination including spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Hyperreflective foci were counted considering horizontal B-scan passing through the fovea. RESULTS: On spectral domain optical coherence tomography, patients affected by Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes had a mean of 7.5 ± 4.6 and 9.9 ± 4.5 hyperreflective foci, respectively. Subjects of control groups had a mean of 0.9 ± 0.8 and 1.7 ± 1.5 hyperreflective foci, respectively. Hyperreflective foci amount was statistically different between Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic groups (P = 0.032) and significantly higher in diabeticpatients than in controls (P < 0.001). Hyperreflective foci amount was significantly higher in diabeticpatients with a poor quality glycometabolic control (P < 0.001 and P = 0.016) or affected by hypertension (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: We reported the presence of hyperreflective foci in diabeticpatients without diabetic macular edema and visual impairment. This spectral domain optical coherence tomography finding might be a useful marker for the diagnosis and the follow-up in the early stage of diabetic retinopathy.
Authors: Barbara Berasategui; Alex Fonollosa; Joseba Artaraz; Ioana Ruiz-Arruza; Jose Ríos; Jessica Matas; Victor Llorenç; David Diaz-Valle; Marina Sastre-Ibañez; Pedro Arriola-Villalobos; Alfredo Adan Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 2.209