Ping Yin1, Ning Mao2, Sicong Wang3, Chao Sun1, Nan Hong1. 1. 1Department of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, 11 Xizhimen Nandajie, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, PR China. 2. 2Department of Radiology, Qingdao University Medical College Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, Shandong 264000, PR China. 3. 3GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Beijing 100176, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate clinical-radiomics nomograms based on three-dimensional CT and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for pre-operative differentiation of sacral chordoma (SC) and sacral giant cell tumor (SGCT). METHODS: A total of 83 SC and 54 SGCT patients diagnosed through surgical pathology were retrospectively analyzed. We built six models based on CT, CT enhancement (CTE), T1 weighted, T2 weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and contrast-enhanced T1 weighted features, two radiomics nomograms and two clinical-radiomics nomograms combined radiomics mixed features with clinical data. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy (ACC) analysis were used to assess the performance of the models. RESULTS: SC and SGCT presented significant differences in terms of age, sex, and tumor location (tage = 9.00, χ2sex = 10.86, χ2location = 26.20; p < 0.01). For individual scan, the radiomics model based on diffusion-weighted imaging features yielded the highest AUC of 0.889 and ACC of 0.885, followed by CT (AUC = 0.857; ACC = 0.846) and CT enhancement (AUC = 0.833; ACC = 0.769). For the combined features, the radiomics model based on mixed CT features exhibited a better AUC of 0.942 and ACC of 0.880, whereas mixed MRI features achieved a lower performance than the individual scan. The clinical-radiomics nomogram based on combined CT features achieved the highest AUC of 0.948 and ACC of 0.920. CONCLUSIONS: The radiomics model based on CT and multiparametricMRI present a certain predictive value in distinguishing SC and SGCT, which can be used for auxiliary diagnosis before operation. The clinical-radiomics nomograms performed better than radiomics nomograms. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Clinical-radiomics nomograms based on CT and mpMRI features can be used for preoperative differentiation of SC and SGCT.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate clinical-radiomics nomograms based on three-dimensional CT and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for pre-operative differentiation of sacral chordoma (SC) and sacral giant cell tumor (SGCT). METHODS: A total of 83 SC and 54 SGCT patients diagnosed through surgical pathology were retrospectively analyzed. We built six models based on CT, CT enhancement (CTE), T1 weighted, T2 weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and contrast-enhanced T1 weighted features, two radiomics nomograms and two clinical-radiomics nomograms combined radiomics mixed features with clinical data. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy (ACC) analysis were used to assess the performance of the models. RESULTS: SC and SGCT presented significant differences in terms of age, sex, and tumor location (tage = 9.00, χ2sex = 10.86, χ2location = 26.20; p < 0.01). For individual scan, the radiomics model based on diffusion-weighted imaging features yielded the highest AUC of 0.889 and ACC of 0.885, followed by CT (AUC = 0.857; ACC = 0.846) and CT enhancement (AUC = 0.833; ACC = 0.769). For the combined features, the radiomics model based on mixed CT features exhibited a better AUC of 0.942 and ACC of 0.880, whereas mixed MRI features achieved a lower performance than the individual scan. The clinical-radiomics nomogram based on combined CT features achieved the highest AUC of 0.948 and ACC of 0.920. CONCLUSIONS: The radiomics model based on CT and multiparametricMRI present a certain predictive value in distinguishing SC and SGCT, which can be used for auxiliary diagnosis before operation. The clinical-radiomics nomograms performed better than radiomics nomograms. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Clinical-radiomics nomograms based on CT and mpMRI features can be used for preoperative differentiation of SC and SGCT.
Authors: Natalie R Boonzaier; Timothy J Larkin; Tomasz Matys; Anouk van der Hoorn; Jiun-Lin Yan; Stephen J Price Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Sean D McGarry; Sarah L Hurrell; Amy L Kaczmarowski; Elizabeth J Cochran; Jennifer Connelly; Scott D Rand; Kathleen M Schmainda; Peter S LaViolette Journal: Tomography Date: 2016-09