| Literature DB >> 31276066 |
Roman Aleksiewicz1, Krzysztof Lutnicki2, Marcin Bojarski3, Ilona Al-Mutari4, Aneta Bocheńska3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of duplex Doppler to objectify swine renal arterial flow in physiological conditions. The pig kidney was selected for its morphological similarities to the human and for the results therefore offering data to wider research.Entities:
Keywords: kidney; pulsatility index; resistance index; swine; systolic/diastolic index
Year: 2019 PMID: 31276066 PMCID: PMC6598193 DOI: 10.2478/jvetres-2019-0036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Res ISSN: 2450-7393 Impact factor: 1.744
Fig. 1Blood flow spectrum recorded in the segmental artery of the swine kidney during physiological conditions. V1 – maximum of peak systolic velocity (PSV), V2 – minimum end diastolic velocity (ESV), V1/V2 – the ratio of the maximum to the minimum velocity, dv – difference between the maximum and minimum velocity, dt – observation time, Acc – value of acceleration/delay (on the graph: the angle of the curve’s rise – positive value; the angle of the curve’s fall– negative value)
Fig. 2Blood flow spectrum recorded in the segmental artery of the swine kidney during physiological conditions
Values of flows in the segmental kidney artery
| Parameter | Min | Max | Time (min) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| V1(cm/s) | 92.66 (± 0.95) | 91.45 | 93.89 | |
| V2(cm/s) | 46.43 (± 0.88) | 45.05 | 47.07 | |
| V1 / V2 | 2.04 (± 0.16) | 1.98 | 2.21 | 0 |
| dv(cm/s) | −43.23 (± 0.15) | −44.25 | −42.16 | |
| Acc(cm/s2) | −88.61 (± 0.18) | −90.12 | −87.32 | |
| V1(cm/s) | 88.26 (± 0.75) | 87.02 | 89.12 | |
| V2(cm/s) | 46.05 (± 0.65) | 45.65 | 47.23 | |
| V1 / V2 | 1.89 (± 0.26) | 1.77 | 1.98 | 15 |
| dv(cm/s) | −42.45 (± 0.16) | −43.26 | −41.24 | |
| Acc(cm/s2) | −71.95 (± 0.22) | −72.25 | −70.65 | |
| V1(cm/s) | 89.08 (± 0.62) | 88.83 | 89.87 | |
| V2(cm/s) | 47.83 (± 0.73) | 46.66 | 49.01 | |
| V1 / V2 | 1.86 (± 0.19) | 1.65 | 1.98 | 30 |
| dv(cm/s) | −41.25 (± 0.18) | −42.25 | −40.25 | |
| Acc(cm/s2) | −65.48 (± 0.18) | −67.55 | −64.15 | |
| V1(cm/s) | 86.09 (± 0.83) | 85.14 | 86.77 | |
| V2(cm/s) | 46.63 (± 0.77) | 46.25 | 47.88 | |
| V1 / V2 | 1.85 (± 0.22) | 1.76 | 1.92 | 45 |
| dv(cm/s) | −39.46 (± 0.11) | −40.45 | −38.24 | |
| Acc(cm/s2) | −68.03 (± 0.22) | −70.05 | −66.93 | |
| V1(cm/s) | 87.27 (± 0.64) | 86.45 | 87.32 | |
| V2(cm/s) | 47.24 (± 0.65) | 46.76 | 47.44 | |
| V1 / V2 | 1.85 (± 0.23) | 1.77 | 1.94 | 60 |
| dv(cm/s) | −41.32 (± 0.17) | −42.15 | −40.38 | |
| Acc(cm/s2) | −73.32 (± 0.15) | −75.25 | −72.33 | |
V1 – maximum of peak systolic velocity, V2 – minimum end diastolic velocity, V1/V2 – the ratio of the maximum to the minimum velocity, dv – difference between the maximum and minimum velocity, Acc – value of acceleration/delay
Values determined for RI, PI, and S/ D indices
| Index | Value (SD) | Value (SD) | Value (SD) | Value (SD) | Value (SD) | Min | Max | SD2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RI | 0.57 (±0.04) | 0.57 (±0.04) | 0.57 (±0.06) | 0.59 (±0.04) | 0.6 (±0.04) | 0.58 (±0.014) | 0.57 | 0.6 | 0.0002 |
| PI | 1.21 (±0.51) | 1.22 (±0.19) | 1.25 (±0.44) | 1.25 (±0.8) | 1.3 (±0.11) | 1.24 (±0.035) | 1.21 | 1.3 | 0.00123 |
| S/D | 2.2 (±0.31) | 2.24 (±0.34) | 2.22 (±0.28) | 2.3 (±0.3) | 2.49 (±0.36) | 2.29 (±0.117) | 2.2 | 2.2 | 0.0139 |
| 0 | 15 | 30 | 45 | 60 | |||||
| Time (min.) |
RI – (resistance index, Pourcelot index), PI – (pulsatility index, Gosling’s index), S/D – (systolic/diastolic index)
Values of Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and Spearman correlation coefficients (rho)
| RI & PI (p < 0.001) | 0.857 | 0.739 |
| RI & S/D (p < 0.05) | 0.930 | 0.941 |
| PI & S/D (p < 0.001) | 0.913 | 0.754 |
RI – (resistance index, Pourcelot index), PI – (pulsatility index, Gosling’s index), S/D – (systolic/diastolic index)