| Literature DB >> 31276057 |
Ewelina Pyzik1, Agnieszka Marek1, Dagmara Stępień-Pyśniak1, Renata Urban-Chmiel1, Łukasz S Jarosz2, Izabella Jagiełło-Podębska3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The study sought to characterise antimicrobial resistance among coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS) species recovered from broiler chickens and turkeys in Poland including the presence of 12 antimicrobial resistance genes and five classical genes of staphylococcal enterotoxins.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance genes; coagulase-negative Staphylococcus; enterotoxigenicity; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus; poultry
Year: 2019 PMID: 31276057 PMCID: PMC6598191 DOI: 10.2478/jvetres-2019-0023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Res ISSN: 2450-7393 Impact factor: 1.744
Nucleotide sequences and sizes of PCR products of antibiotic resistance genes and enterotoxins (A–E)
| Primer* | Oligonucleotide sequence (5’-3’)** | Gene | size of amplified product (bp) | Control strain | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEC-1 | AAAATCGATGGTAAAGGTTGGC | ||||
| MEC-2 | AGTTCTGGCACTACCGGATTTGC | 533 | ATCC43300 | (17) | |
| BLAZ-1 | ACTTCAACACCTGCTGCTTTC | 240 | (7) | ||
| BLAZ-2 | TAGGTTCAGATTGGCCCTTAG | ATCCBAA-2312 | |||
| TETM-1 | GAACTCGAACAAGAGGAAAGC | ||||
| TETM-2 | ATGGAAGCCCAGAAAGG T | 406 | 7020 | ||
| TETK-1 | TCGATAGGAACAGCAGTA | ||||
| TETK-2 | CAGCAGATCCTACTCCTT | 155 | ET18 | (13) | |
| TETL-1 | TGGTGGAATGATAGCCCATT | ||||
| TETL-1 | CAGGAATGACAGCACGCTAA | 229 | |||
| TETO-1 | AACTTAGGCATTCTGGCTCAC | ||||
| TETO-2 | TCCCACTGTTCCATATCGTCA | 515 | JH2-2TET | ||
| ERMA-1 | CCCGAAAAATACGCAAAATTTCAT | ||||
| ERMA-2 | CCCTGTTTACCCATTTATAAACG | 590 | 955 | ||
| ERMB-1 | TGGTATTCCAAATGCGTAATG | (13, 14) | |||
| ERMB-2 | CTGTGGTATGGCGGGTAAGT | 745 | PE1 | ||
| MSRA/B-1 | GCAAATGGTGTAGGTAAGACAACT | ||||
| MSRA/B-2 | ATCATGTGATGTAAACAAAAT | 399 | RN4220 | (26) | |
| ACC-1 | CAGGAATTTATCGAAAATGGTAGAAAAG | ||||
| ACC-2 | CACAATCGACTAAAGAGTACCAATC | 348 | M48 | (27, 28) | |
| CFR-1 | TGAAGTATAAAGCAGGTTGGGAGTCA | ||||
| CFR-2 | ACCATATAATTGACCACAAGCAGC | 746 | (11) | ||
| ESA1 | ACGATCAATTTTTACAGC | ||||
| ESA2 | TGCATGTTTTCAGAGTTAATC | 144 | FRI913 | (1) | |
| ESB1 | GAATGATATTAATTCGCATC | ATCC13566 | |||
| ESB2 | TCTTTGTCGTAAGATAAACTTC | 416 | (5) | ||
| ESC1 | GACATAAAAGCTAGGAATTT | ||||
| ESC2 | AAATCGGATTAACATTATCCA | 257 | FRI913 | (1) | |
| ESD1 | TTACTAGTTTGGTAATATCTCCTT | ||||
| ESD2 | CCACCATAACAATTAATGC | 334 | FRI151m | (3) | |
| ESE1 | ATAGATAAAGTTAAAACAAGCAA | ||||
| ESE2 | TAACTTACCGTGGACCC | 170 | FRI913 | (3) |
* The sets of primers were synthesised by Genomed S.A., Poland.
** The concentration of primers was 0.04 μmol
Phenotypic* antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus strains isolated from broiler chickens and turkeys
| Antibiotic | S. epidermidis | S. hominis | S. saprophyticus | S. lentus | S. xylosus | S. haemolyticus | S. sciuri | S. simulans | S. chromogenes | S. cohnii | Total2 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 17 | n = 4 | n = 20 | n = 10 | n = 15 | n = 4 | n = 10 | n = 5 | n = 9 | n = 33 | n = 127 | ||||||||||||
| R1 | I1 | R | I | R | I | R | I | R | I | R | I | R | I | R | I | R | I | R | I | Number | % | |
| Amoxicillin | 3 | 2 | 3 | - | 2 | - | 1 | 1 | 3 | - | 2 | 1 | 1 | - | - | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 27 | 21.3 |
| Amoxicillin + clavulanic acid | 2 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 2 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | - | 10 | 7.9 |
| Ampicillin | 9 | - | 4 | - | 8 | 1 | 6 | - | 7 | - | 2 | 2 | 3 | - | 1 | 1 | 3 | - | 16 | - | 63 | 49.6 |
| Penicillin G | 10 | 1 | 4 | - | 8 | - | 7 | - | 9 | - | 4 | - | 2 | - | 3 | 1 | 4 | - | 15 | 1 | 69 | 54.3 |
| Cefoxitin | 7 | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | 2 | - | 3 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 5 | - | 21 | 16.5 |
| Clindamycin | 2 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 7 | 5.5 |
| Chloramphenicol | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 4 | 3.1 |
| Erythromycin | 4 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 3 | - | 2 | - | 1 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | - | 18 | 14.1 |
| Gentamycin | 5 | 1 | 1 | - | 4 | - | 4 | 1 | 7 | - | - | - | 4 | - | - | - | 2 | - | 3 | - | 32 | 25.2 |
| Tetracycline | 8 | - | 2 | - | 15 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 9 | - | 2 | 2 | 3 | - | 3 | - | 6 | - | 13 | 1 | 75 | 59.1 |
| Trimethoprim -sulphamethoxazole | 2 | - | - | - | 3 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 2 | - | 9 | 7.1 |
* The susceptibility of 11 antibiotics was tested using a standard disc diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar plates
1R - resistant, I - intermediate
2The resistance rate was calculated as the number of intermediate and resistant isolates divided by the total number of isolates
Multidrug resistance profiles of CNS from broiler chickens and turkeys
| Phenotypic resistance combination pattern1,2 | n = number of classes antimicrobial agents3 | number of strains | |
|---|---|---|---|
| P, AMP | 1 | 2 | |
| P, AMP, TE | 2 | 7 | |
| P, AMP, TE, SXT | 3 | 2 | |
| P, AMP, TE, AML, FOX, E | 3 | 2 | |
| P, AMP, TE, AML, FOX, E, CN, C | 5 | 2 | |
| P, AMP, TE, AMC, FOX, E, CN, DA | 5 | 1 | |
| TE | 1 | 10 | |
| TE, AMP | 2 | 1 | |
| TE, P, AMP | 2 | 3 | |
| TE, P, AMP, AML, FOX | 2 | 1 | |
| TE, P, AMP, CN, SXT | 4 | 3 | |
| TE, P, AMP, CN, AML, C | 4 | 1 | |
| P | 1 | 2 | |
| P, AMP, CN | 2 | 1 | |
| P, AMP, TE | 2 | 1 | |
| P, AMP, FOX, TE, SXT | 3 | 1 | |
| P, AMP, FOX, TE, SXT, C | 4 | 1 | |
| P, AMP, FOX, TE, CN, AML | 3 | 1 | |
| P, AMP, FOX, TE, CN, AML, E, DA | 5 | 2 | |
| P, AMP, FOX, TE, CN, AML, E, AMC | 4 | 2 | |
| P, TE | 2 | 2 | |
| P, AMP, TE, CN | 3 | 2 | |
| P, AMP, TE, CN, E | 4 | 2 | |
| P, AMP, TE,CN, AMC, AML, FOX | 3 | 2 | |
| P, AMP, TE, CN, AML, FOX, DA | 4 | 1 | |
| E, CN | 2 | 2 | |
| AMP, TE, CN | 3 | 1 | |
| AMP, TE, P | 2 | 1 | |
| AMP, TE, P, CN, AML | 3 | 1 | |
| P, TE | 2 | 1 | |
| P, AMP, TE, SXT | 3 | 1 | |
| P, AMP, TE, CN, E | 4 | 3 | |
| P, AMP, TE, CN, AML, FOX | 3 | 1 | |
| P, AMP, TE, CN, AMC, AML, FOX, DA | 4 | 1 | |
| TE | 1 | 1 | |
| TE, P, CN | 3 | 2 | |
| TE, AMP, AML | 2 | 1 | |
| TE, P, AMP, AML, SXT | 3 | 1 | |
| TE, P, AMP, AML, AMC | 3 | 1 | |
| P, TE | 2 | 2 | |
| P, AMP, TE | 2 | 1 | |
| P, AMP, AML, AMC, FOX | 2 | 1 | |
| P, AMP, CN, E | 3 | 1 | |
| P, AMP, AML, TE | 2 | 2 | |
| P, AMP, AML, AMC, FOX, DA | 2 | 1 | |
| P, AMP, AML, TE | 2 | 3 | |
| P, AMP, AMC, DA, E, FOX, TE | 4 | 1 | |
AMC – amoxicillin + clavulanic acid; AML – amoxicillin; AMP – ampicillin; C – chloramphenicol; CN – gentamicin; DA – clindamycin; E – erythromycin; FOX – cefoxitin; P – penicillin; SXT – sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim; TE – tetracycline
2The resistance rate was calculated as the number of intermediate and resistant isolates divided by the total number of isolates
3Applied classes of antimicrobial agents: aminoglycosides, penicillins + b-lactamase inhibitors, lincosamides, macrolides, phenicols, tetracyclines, and folate pathway inhibitors
PCR for the presence of genes of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus strains isolated from broiler chickens and turkeys
| Species | Number of positive samples | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | 4 | 1 | - | 2 | - | 1 | 3 | 1 | 26 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2 | - | 1 | - | 1 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 15 | 9 | |
| - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 4 | 2 | |
| 11 | 5 | 2 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 8 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | 6 | - | - | 3 | - | - | - | 6 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | 1 | - | - | 2 | - | 1 | - | 6 | 5 | |
| 1 | 3 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | 3 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | - | 2 | 4 | |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | |
| - | 7 | 1 | 2 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | 3 | 3 | |
| total: 127 | 46 | 30 | 17 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 11 | 10 | 3 | 74 | 35 |