| Literature DB >> 31275996 |
Maha M Arafah1, Mohammad M Al-Qattan2,3,4,5, Durria A Abdulmaged-Ahmed3, Ghada A Al-Nafesah3, Nessrin Y Jadu3, Reginald S Bagayawa3, Medhat K Shier3, Amir Marzouk3, Hend S Almalki6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The "nAG" protein is the key protein mediating the regeneration of amputated limbs in salamanders. The senior author (MMA) developed the original hypothesis that since "nAG" is a "regenerative" protein, it must be also an "antifibrotic' protein. The antifibrotic properties were later confirmed in a rabbit skin hypertrophic scar model as well as in a rat spinal cord injury model. The aim of this study is to evaluate the potential therapeutic properties of the nAG protein in a rat liver fibrosis model.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31275996 PMCID: PMC6582902 DOI: 10.1155/2019/9846919
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Metavir histological grading of liver fibrosis.
| Grade of fibrosis | Description |
|---|---|
| F0 | no fibrosis |
|
| |
| F1 | Mild fibrosis: Fibrous portal expansion with mild localized fibrosis in the portal area |
|
| |
| F2 | Moderate fibrosis: Portal fibrosis with few fibrous septa. |
|
| |
| F3 | Severe fibrosis: Portal fibrosis with numerous fibrous septa. |
|
| |
| F4 | Cirrhosis: Marked portal-to-portal and portal-to central fibrosis with regenerative nodules. |
Results of the serum levels of various proteins in the three groups.
| SERUM LEVEL OF: | Group I | Group II | Group III |
|---|---|---|---|
| (Control) | (CCL4 treatment) | (CCL4/nAG treatment) | |
| N=15 | N=15 | N=15 | |
| Hyaluronic acid | 15.133 ± 0.063 | 29.80 ± 6.145 | 15.739 ± 3.231 ∧ |
|
| |||
| PDGF-AB | 18.292 ± 0.023 | 202.839 ± 124.73 | 58.905 ± 29.198 ∧+ |
|
| |||
| TIMP-1 | 35.563 ± 0.0299 | 449.25 ± 294.71 | 161.919 ± 67.518 ∧+ |
|
| |||
| Laminin | 257.27 ± 12.91 | 1238.588 ± 622.419 | 415.34 ± 136.934 ∧+ |
|
| |||
| Procollagen III N-terminal peptide | 0.242 ± 0.021 | 0.355 ± 0.050 | 0.161 ± 0.051∧+ |
|
| |||
| Collagen Type IV- Alpha-1 chain | 2.933 ± 2.193 | 21.915 ± 9.226 | 3.08 ± 2.539 ∧ |
∗There was a significant difference between the control group and the CCL4 treatment group since P < 0.05.
∧There was a significant difference between the CCL4 treatment group and CCL4/nAG treatment group since P < 0.05.
+There was a significant difference between the control group and CCL4/nAG treatment group since P < 0.05.
The staging of liver fibrosis in the two experimental groups.
| Degree of Fibrosis | Group II: CCL4 only | Group III: CCL4 and nAG |
|---|---|---|
| (n=15 rats) | (n=15 rats) | |
| No or mild fibrosis | 2 (both rats had mild fibrosis) | 9 (3 rats had no fibrosis and 6 rats had mild fibrosis) |
|
| ||
| Moderate to severe fibrosis | 13 (4 rats had moderate fibrosis and 9 rats had severe fibrosis) | 6 (4 rats had moderate fibrosis and 2 rats had severe fibrosis) |
P= 0.008.