Literature DB >> 31273401

Role of dopamine D1-like and D2-like receptors in the activation of ingestive behaviour in thirsty rats licking for water.

Paolo S D'Aquila1, Domenico Elia2, Adriana Galistu2.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Analysis of lick pattern for sucrose and NaCl and of the forced swimming response after dopamine antagonist administration led us to suggest that dopamine on D1-like receptors is involved in behavioural activation, and the level of activation is "reboosted" on the basis of an evaluation process involving D2-like receptors. Although some studies investigated licking microstructure for water after dopamine antagonists, the within-session time course of their effect was never investigated.
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to further investigate the role of dopamine receptors in the mechanisms governing water ingestion, focussing on the within-session time course of the microstructure parameters, and to test the proposed hypothesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The effects of the dopamine D1-like receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (0.01-0.04 mg/kg) and of the dopamine D2-like receptor antagonist raclopride (0.025-0.25 mg/kg) on licking microstructure for water were examined in 20-h water-deprived rats in 30-min sessions.
RESULTS: As previously observed with sucrose and NaCl, SCH 23390 reduced licking by reducing burst number, suggesting reduced behavioural activation. Moreover, it resulted in an increased burst size. Raclopride reduced the size of licking bursts, while their number was either increased or decreased depending on the dose.
CONCLUSION: The results support the suggestion that D1 receptors are involved in behavioural activation and D2 receptors are involved in a related evaluation process. Within the framework of the proposed hypothesis, the increased burst size after D1-like receptor blockade might be interpreted as a pro-hedonic effect consequent to the increased cost of the activation of the licking response.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activation; Dopamine; Dopamine receptor; Ingestion; Motivation; Reward

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31273401     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-019-05317-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  75 in total

1.  Analysis of the microstructure of the rhythmic tongue movements of rats ingesting maltose and sucrose solutions.

Authors:  J D Davis; G P Smith
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 2.  The microstructure of ingestive behavior.

Authors:  J D Davis
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  A partial reinforcement extinction effect in water-reinforced rats intermittently treated with haloperidol.

Authors:  A Ettenberg; C H Camp
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  Effect of clozapine upon schedule-induced polydipsia (SIP) resembles neither the actions of dopamine D1 nor D2 blockade.

Authors:  M Didriksen; G M Olsen; A V Christensen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Clozapine increases reward evaluation but not overall ingestive behaviour in rats licking for sucrose.

Authors:  Adriana Galistu; Cristina Modde; Maria Cristina Pireddu; Flavia Franconi; Gino Serra; Paolo S D'Aquila
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Possible role of dopamine D1-like and D2-like receptors in behavioural activation and "contingent" reward evaluation in sodium-replete and sodium-depleted rats licking for NaCl solutions.

Authors:  Paolo S D'Aquila; Roberta Rossi; Antonella Rizzi; Adriana Galistu
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 7.  The debate over dopamine's role in reward: the case for incentive salience.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Effects of pimozide on appetitive behavior and locomotor activity: dissimilarity of effects when compared to extinction.

Authors:  K J Spivak; Z Amit
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1986

9.  Neuroleptic-induced "anhedonia" in rats: pimozide blocks reward quality of food.

Authors:  R A Wise; J Spindler; H deWit; G J Gerberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Challenges to Body Fluid Homeostasis Differentially Recruit Phasic Dopamine Signaling in a Taste-Selective Manner.

Authors:  Samantha M Fortin; Mitchell F Roitman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of nucleus accumbens insulin inactivation on microstructure of licking for glucose and saccharin in male and female rats.

Authors:  Kenneth D Carr; Sydney P Weiner
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2022-03-02

2.  Dopaminylation in Psychostimulant Use Disorder Protects Against Psychostimulant Seeking Behavior by Normalizing Nucleus Accumbens (NAc) Dopamine Expression.

Authors:  Kenneth Blum; Mark S Gold; Jean L Cadet; David Baron; Abdalla Bowirrat; Panayotis K Thanos; Raymond Brewer; Rajendra D Badgaiyan; Marjorie C Gondré-Lewis
Journal:  Curr Psychopharmacol       Date:  2021-01-08

3.  Further characterization of the effect of the prototypical antidepressant imipramine on the microstructure of licking for sucrose.

Authors:  Paolo S D'Aquila; Adriana Galistu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Predictive and motivational factors influencing anticipatory contrast: A comparison of contextual and gustatory predictors in food restricted and free-fed rats.

Authors:  Jessica Hayes; Celia Garau; Giulia Chiacchierini; Gonzalo P Urcelay; James E McCutcheon; John Apergis-Schoute
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2021-09-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.