Literature DB >> 31272723

Fertility counseling and preservation discussions for females with Turner syndrome in pediatric centers: practice patterns and predictors.

Taylor L Morgan1, Hillary M Kapa2, Canice E Crerand3, Jessica Kremen4, Amy Tishelman4, Shanlee Davis5, Leena Nahata6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine fertility counseling and fertility preservation (FP) referrals for young women with Turner syndrome (TS) at pediatric centers and identify possible associations with patient demographic and medical characteristics.
DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review.
SETTING: Pediatric academic medical centers. PATIENT(S): Four hundred and sixty-nine young women with TS (mean age = 14 years, standard deviation 8.5 years; 77% white) who received care between March 2013 and March 2018. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Standardized form to abstract demographics, medical (karyotype; menarchal status; developmental, neuropsychological, and psychological concerns), and treatment characteristics (duration of care, receipt of multidisciplinary care, documentation of fertility/pregnancy counseling, FP specialist referrals) from medical records. RESULT(S): We found that 67% of families had documented fertility counseling, although only 27% of charts documented counseling with patients specifically. Only 10% of patients were referred to a FP specialist; 59% of patients with spontaneous menarche had no referral. Pregnancy risk counseling was documented in 38% of charts. In multivariate analyses, families were more likely to receive counseling if the patients had multidisciplinary care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.82). Greater duration of care (AOR 1.16); mosaic (AOR 47.94), complex (AOR 14.59), or partial deletions karyotypes (AOR 35.69); spontaneous menarche (AOR 4.65); and multidisciplinary care (AOR 4.02) had increased odds of FP specialist referrals. Patients with developmental concerns (AOR 0.08) had decreased odds of referrals. CONCLUSION(S): Fertility and pregnancy counseling are not routinely documented among patients with TS, and even patients with a limited window of reproductive potential were infrequently referred to FP specialists. Patients seen in multidisciplinary clinics were more likely to receive recommended counseling.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fertility; Turner syndrome; pediatric; preservation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31272723     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  3 in total

1.  Fertility Counseling Practices for Patients with Turner Syndrome in Pediatric Endocrine Clinics: Results of a Pediatric Endocrine Society Survey.

Authors:  Charleen I Theroux; Victoria Elliott; Shanlee Davis; Canice E Crerand; Jessica Kremen; Amy Tishelman; Christa Hutaff-Lee; Leena Nahata
Journal:  Horm Res Paediatr       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.275

2.  Neurodevelopmental and Mental Health Screening for Patients with Turner Syndrome in Pediatric Endocrine Clinics: Results of a Pediatric Endocrine Society Survey.

Authors:  Shanlee Davis; Canice Crerand; Christa Hutaff-Lee; Talia Thompson; Amy Tishelman; Omar Samara; Hailey Umbaugh; Leena Nahata; Jessica Kremen
Journal:  Horm Res Paediatr       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.852

3.  Why Turner patients with 45, X monosomy should not be excluded from fertility preservation services.

Authors:  M J Schleedoorn; K Fleischer; Ddm Braat; Ajm Oerlemans; Aaem van der Velden; R Peek
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 4.982

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.