Charleen I Theroux1, Victoria Elliott2,3, Shanlee Davis2,3, Canice E Crerand1,4, Jessica Kremen5,6, Amy Tishelman7, Christa Hutaff-Lee2,3, Leena Nahata1,4. 1. Center for Biobehavioral Health, The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 3. eXtraOrdinary Kids Turner Syndrome Clinic, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 4. Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 6. Division of Endocrinology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 7. Department of Psychology, Boston College, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Turner syndrome (TS) is associated with a high risk of primary ovarian insufficiency. Current guidelines recommend early fertility counseling for affected youth and their families. This study assessed clinical providers' (MD, NP, or PA) fertility counseling practices for girls with TS. METHODS: TS providers were invited to complete a survey via the Pediatric Endocrine Society listserv. Descriptive statistics summarized variables of interest. Correlations were used to identify associations between barriers/practice characteristics and fertility preservation (FP) referral. Thematic analysis was used to examine qualitative responses. RESULTS: 119 providers completed the survey. Seventy percent reported discussing fertility implications of TS routinely in pediatric care. Fifty-six percent reported often or always referring patients with spontaneous menarche to FP specialists, whereas only 19% reported often or always referring their patients without spontaneous menarche (p < 0.001). Barriers associated with FP referral frequency included unfamiliarity with FP options, belief that FP is not a possible goal for their patients, and absence of a local reproductive endocrinologist. Qualitatively, four referral barrier themes were identified: (1) questionable utility of referral, (2) lack of perceived interest among patients/families, (3) provider barriers (e.g., lack of knowledge), (4) logistical/structural barriers to accessing fertility-related care. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSION: Pediatric endocrinology providers report inconsistently discussing fertility implications of TS. The frequency of referral to an FP specialist and factors/barriers affecting the decision to refer remain variable. Future research should focus on expanding provider education, addressing barriers to high-quality fertility counseling and referral for patients with TS, and investigating FP outcomes in TS.
INTRODUCTION: Turner syndrome (TS) is associated with a high risk of primary ovarian insufficiency. Current guidelines recommend early fertility counseling for affected youth and their families. This study assessed clinical providers' (MD, NP, or PA) fertility counseling practices for girls with TS. METHODS: TS providers were invited to complete a survey via the Pediatric Endocrine Society listserv. Descriptive statistics summarized variables of interest. Correlations were used to identify associations between barriers/practice characteristics and fertility preservation (FP) referral. Thematic analysis was used to examine qualitative responses. RESULTS: 119 providers completed the survey. Seventy percent reported discussing fertility implications of TS routinely in pediatric care. Fifty-six percent reported often or always referring patients with spontaneous menarche to FP specialists, whereas only 19% reported often or always referring their patients without spontaneous menarche (p < 0.001). Barriers associated with FP referral frequency included unfamiliarity with FP options, belief that FP is not a possible goal for their patients, and absence of a local reproductive endocrinologist. Qualitatively, four referral barrier themes were identified: (1) questionable utility of referral, (2) lack of perceived interest among patients/families, (3) provider barriers (e.g., lack of knowledge), (4) logistical/structural barriers to accessing fertility-related care. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSION: Pediatric endocrinology providers report inconsistently discussing fertility implications of TS. The frequency of referral to an FP specialist and factors/barriers affecting the decision to refer remain variable. Future research should focus on expanding provider education, addressing barriers to high-quality fertility counseling and referral for patients with TS, and investigating FP outcomes in TS.
Authors: Leena Nahata; Sonja I Ziniel; Katharine C Garvey; Richard N Yu; Laurie E Cohen Journal: J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab Date: 2017-01-01 Impact factor: 1.634
Authors: Elizabeth Dabrowski; Rachel Jensen; Emilie K Johnson; Reema L Habiby; Wendy J Brickman; Courtney Finlayson Journal: Horm Res Paediatr Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Claus H Gravholt; Niels H Andersen; Gerard S Conway; Olaf M Dekkers; Mitchell E Geffner; Karen O Klein; Angela E Lin; Nelly Mauras; Charmian A Quigley; Karen Rubin; David E Sandberg; Theo C J Sas; Michael Silberbach; Viveca Söderström-Anttila; Kirstine Stochholm; Janielle A van Alfen-van derVelden; Joachim Woelfle; Philippe F Backeljauw Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: Michael Silberbach; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Niels H Andersen; Alan C Braverman; Nicole Brown; R Thomas Collins; Julie De Backer; Kim A Eagle; Loren F Hiratzka; Walter H Johnson; Daniella Kadian-Dodov; Leo Lopez; Kristian H Mortensen; Siddharth K Prakash; Elizabeth V Ratchford; Arwa Saidi; Iris van Hagen; Luciana T Young Journal: Circ Genom Precis Med Date: 2018-10
Authors: Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil; Lindsey King; Cheryl A Miree; Crystal Wilson; Opal Raj; Jordan Watson; Alana Lopez; Terrance L Albrecht Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2009-10-01