Literature DB >> 31272093

Impact of image preprocessing on the scanner dependence of multi-parametric MRI radiomic features and covariate shift in multi-institutional glioblastoma datasets.

Hyemin Um1, Florent Tixier, Dalton Bermudez, Joseph O Deasy, Robert J Young, Harini Veeraraghavan.   

Abstract

Recent advances in radiomics have enhanced the value of medical imaging in various aspects of clinical practice, but a crucial component that remains to be investigated further is the robustness of quantitative features to imaging variations and across multiple institutions. In the case of MRI, signal intensity values vary according to the acquisition parameters used, yet no consensus exists on which preprocessing techniques are favorable in reducing scanner-dependent variability of image-based features. Hence, the purpose of this study was to assess the impact of common image preprocessing methods on the scanner dependence of MRI radiomic features in multi-institutional glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) datasets. Two independent GBM cohorts were analyzed: 50 cases from the TCGA-GBM dataset and 111 cases acquired in our institution, and each case consisted of 3 MRI sequences viz. FLAIR, T1-weighted, and T1-weighted post-contrast. Five image preprocessing techniques were examined: 8-bit global rescaling, 8-bit local rescaling, bias field correction, histogram standardization, and isotropic resampling. A total of 420 features divided into eight categories representing texture, shape, edge, and intensity histogram were extracted. Two distinct imaging parameters were considered: scanner manufacturer and scanner magnetic field strength. Wilcoxon tests identified features robust to the considered acquisition parameters under the selected image preprocessing techniques. A machine learning-based strategy was implemented to measure the covariate shift between the analyzed datasets using features computed using the aforementioned preprocessing methods. Finally, radiomic scores (rad-scores) were constructed by identifying features relevant to patients' overall survival after eliminating those impacted by scanner variability. These were then evaluated for their prognostic significance through Kaplan-Meier and Cox hazards regression analyses. Our results demonstrate that overall, histogram standardization contributes the most in reducing radiomic feature variability as it is the technique to reduce the covariate shift for three feature categories and successfully discriminate patients into groups of different survival risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31272093     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab2f44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  32 in total

1.  A radiomics pipeline dedicated to Breast MRI: validation on a multi-scanner phantom study.

Authors:  Marie-Judith Saint Martin; Fanny Orlhac; Pia Akl; Fahad Khalid; Christophe Nioche; Irène Buvat; Caroline Malhaire; Frédérique Frouin
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  Overview of radiomics in prostate imaging and future directions.

Authors:  Hwan-Ho Cho; Chan Kyo Kim; Hyunjin Park
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Response to the letter to the editor on the article: a non-invasive, automated diagnosis of Menière's disease using radiomics and machine learning on conventional magnetic resonance imaging-a multicentric, case-controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  Marc van Hoof; Raymond van de Berg; Marly F J A van der Lubbe; Akshayaa Vaidyanathan; Marjolein de Wit; Elske L van den Burg; Alida A Postma; Tjasse D Bruintjes; Monique A L Bilderbeek-Beckers; Patrick F M Dammeijer; Stephanie Vanden Bossche; Vincent Van Rompaey; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 6.313

Review 4.  Challenges in ensuring the generalizability of image quantitation methods for MRI.

Authors:  Kathryn E Keenan; Jana G Delfino; Kalina V Jordanova; Megan E Poorman; Prathyush Chirra; Akshay S Chaudhari; Bettina Baessler; Jessica Winfield; Satish E Viswanath; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 4.506

5.  Combined artificial intelligence and radiologist model for predicting rectal cancer treatment response from magnetic resonance imaging: an external validation study.

Authors:  Natally Horvat; Harini Veeraraghavan; Caio S R Nahas; David D B Bates; Felipe R Ferreira; Junting Zheng; Marinela Capanu; James L Fuqua; Maria Clara Fernandes; Ramon E Sosa; Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam; Giovanni G Cerri; Sergio C Nahas; Iva Petkovska
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-06-16

6.  The Pursuit of Generalizability to Enable Clinical Translation of Radiomics.

Authors:  Pallavi Tiwari; Ruchika Verma
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-12-16

7.  Prospective Evaluation of Repeatability and Robustness of Radiomic Descriptors in Healthy Brain Tissue Regions In Vivo Across Systematic Variations in T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition Parameters.

Authors:  Brendan Eck; Prathyush V Chirra; Avani Muchhala; Sophia Hall; Kaustav Bera; Pallavi Tiwari; Anant Madabhushi; Nicole Seiberlich; Satish E Viswanath
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 5.119

8.  Reproducibility analysis of multi-institutional paired expert annotations and radiomic features of the Ivy Glioblastoma Atlas Project (Ivy GAP) dataset.

Authors:  Sarthak Pati; Ruchika Verma; Hamed Akbari; Michel Bilello; Virginia B Hill; Chiharu Sako; Ramon Correa; Niha Beig; Ludovic Venet; Siddhesh Thakur; Prashant Serai; Sung Min Ha; Geri D Blake; Russell Taki Shinohara; Pallavi Tiwari; Spyridon Bakas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Radiomic Based Machine Learning Performance for a Three Class Problem in Neuro-Oncology: Time to Test the Waters?

Authors:  Sarv Priya; Yanan Liu; Caitlin Ward; Nam H Le; Neetu Soni; Ravishankar Pillenahalli Maheshwarappa; Varun Monga; Honghai Zhang; Milan Sonka; Girish Bathla
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  A machine learning model that classifies breast cancer pathologic complete response on MRI post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Sutton; Natsuko Onishi; Duc A Fehr; Brittany Z Dashevsky; Meredith Sadinski; Katja Pinker; Danny F Martinez; Edi Brogi; Lior Braunstein; Pedram Razavi; Mahmoud El-Tamer; Virgilio Sacchini; Joseph O Deasy; Elizabeth A Morris; Harini Veeraraghavan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.