Literature DB >> 34073840

Radiomic Based Machine Learning Performance for a Three Class Problem in Neuro-Oncology: Time to Test the Waters?

Sarv Priya1, Yanan Liu2, Caitlin Ward3, Nam H Le2, Neetu Soni1, Ravishankar Pillenahalli Maheshwarappa1, Varun Monga4, Honghai Zhang2, Milan Sonka2, Girish Bathla1.   

Abstract

Prior radiomics studies have focused on two-class brain tumor classification, which limits generalizability. The performance of radiomics in differentiating the three most common malignant brain tumors (glioblastoma (GBM), primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), and metastatic disease) is assessed; factors affecting the model performance and usefulness of a single sequence versus multiparametric MRI (MP-MRI) remain largely unaddressed. This retrospective study included 253 patients (120 metastatic (lung and brain), 40 PCNSL, and 93 GBM). Radiomic features were extracted for whole a tumor mask (enhancing plus necrotic) and an edema mask (first pipeline), as well as for separate enhancing and necrotic and edema masks (second pipeline). Model performance was evaluated using MP-MRI, individual sequences, and the T1 contrast enhanced (T1-CE) sequence without the edema mask across 45 model/feature selection combinations. The second pipeline showed significantly high performance across all combinations (Brier score: 0.311-0.325). GBRM fit using the full feature set from the T1-CE sequence was the best model. The majority of the top models were built using a full feature set and inbuilt feature selection. No significant difference was seen between the top-performing models for MP-MRI (AUC 0.910) and T1-CE sequence with (AUC 0.908) and without edema masks (AUC 0.894). T1-CE is the single best sequence with comparable performance to that of multiparametric MRI (MP-MRI). Model performance varies based on tumor subregion and the combination of model/feature selection methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CNS lymphoma; MRI; glioblastoma; machine learning; metastases; radiomics; texture

Year:  2021        PMID: 34073840     DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  40 in total

1.  High-grade gliomas and solitary metastases: differentiation by using perfusion and proton spectroscopic MR imaging.

Authors:  Meng Law; Soonmee Cha; Edmond A Knopp; Glyn Johnson; John Arnett; Andrew W Litt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Prospective diagnostic performance evaluation of single-voxel 1H MRS for typing and grading of brain tumours.

Authors:  Margarida Julià-Sapé; Indira Coronel; Carles Majós; Ana Paula Candiota; Marta Serrallonga; Mònica Cos; Carles Aguilera; Juan José Acebes; John R Griffiths; Carles Arús
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Validation of combined use of DWI and percentage signal recovery-optimized protocol of DSC-MRI in differentiation of high-grade glioma, metastasis, and lymphoma.

Authors:  Emetullah Cindil; Halit Nahit Sendur; Mahi Nur Cerit; Nurullah Dag; Nesrin Erdogan; Filiz Elbuken Celebi; Yusuf Oner; Turgut Tali
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  The effect of glioblastoma heterogeneity on survival stratification: a multimodal MR imaging texture analysis.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Xi Zhang; Na Feng; Lulu Yin; Yalong He; Xiaopan Xu; Hongbing Lu
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  Tubular brain tumor biopsy improves diagnostic yield for subcortical lesions.

Authors:  Evan D Bander; Samuel H Jones; David Pisapia; Rajiv Magge; Howard Fine; Theodore H Schwartz; Rohan Ramakrishna
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Diagnostic Value of Fractal Analysis for the Differentiation of Brain Tumors Using 3-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging.

Authors:  Antonio Di Ieva; Pierre-Jean Le Reste; Béatrice Carsin-Nicol; Jean-Christophe Ferre; Michael D Cusimano
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Texture analysis on diffusion tensor imaging: discriminating glioblastoma from single brain metastasis.

Authors:  Karoline Skogen; Anselm Schulz; Eirik Helseth; Balaji Ganeshan; Johann Baptist Dormagen; Andrès Server
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  How is stereotactic brain biopsy evolving? A multicentric analysis of a series of 421 cases treated in Rome over the last sixteen years.

Authors:  Giorgio M Callovini; Stefano Telera; Shahram Sherkat; Isabella Sperduti; Tommaso Callovini; Carmine M Carapella
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 1.876

9.  Comparison between Glioblastoma and Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Using MR Image-based Texture Analysis.

Authors:  Akira Kunimatsu; Natsuko Kunimatsu; Kouhei Kamiya; Takeyuki Watadani; Harushi Mori; Osamu Abe
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 10.  Radiomics in radiation oncology-basics, methods, and limitations.

Authors:  Philipp Lohmann; Khaled Bousabarah; Mauritius Hoevels; Harald Treuer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.621

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Meningioma Radiomics: At the Nexus of Imaging, Pathology and Biomolecular Characterization.

Authors:  Lorenzo Ugga; Gaia Spadarella; Lorenzo Pinto; Renato Cuocolo; Arturo Brunetti
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  A Systematic Review of the Current Status and Quality of Radiomics for Glioma Differential Diagnosis.

Authors:  Valentina Brancato; Marco Cerrone; Marialuisa Lavitrano; Marco Salvatore; Carlo Cavaliere
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Multiparametric MRI-Based Radiomics Model for Predicting H3 K27M Mutant Status in Diffuse Midline Glioma: A Comparative Study Across Different Sequences and Machine Learning Techniques.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Dejun She; Zhen Xing; Xiang Lin; Feng Wang; Yang Song; Dairong Cao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.