Literature DB >> 31270239

Deep evolutionary origin of limb and fin regeneration.

Sylvain Darnet1, Aline C Dragalzew1, Danielson B Amaral1, Josane F Sousa1, Andrew W Thompson2, Amanda N Cass3, Jamily Lorena1,4, Eder S Pires4, Carinne M Costa1, Marcos P Sousa5, Nadia B Fröbisch6, Guilherme Oliveira4, Patricia N Schneider1, Marcus C Davis3, Ingo Braasch2, Igor Schneider7.   

Abstract

Salamanders and lungfishes are the only sarcopterygians (lobe-finned vertebrates) capable of paired appendage regeneration, regardless of the amputation level. Among actinopterygians (ray-finned fishes), regeneration after amputation at the fin endoskeleton has only been demonstrated in polypterid fishes (Cladistia). Whether this ability evolved independently in sarcopterygians and actinopterygians or has a common origin remains unknown. Here we combine fin regeneration assays and comparative RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis of Polypterus and axolotl blastemas to provide support for a common origin of paired appendage regeneration in Osteichthyes (bony vertebrates). We show that, in addition to polypterids, regeneration after fin endoskeleton amputation occurs in extant representatives of 2 other nonteleost actinopterygians: the American paddlefish (Chondrostei) and the spotted gar (Holostei). Furthermore, we assessed regeneration in 4 teleost species and show that, with the exception of the blue gourami (Anabantidae), 3 species were capable of regenerating fins after endoskeleton amputation: the white convict and the oscar (Cichlidae), and the goldfish (Cyprinidae). Our comparative RNA-seq analysis of regenerating blastemas of axolotl and Polypterus reveals the activation of common genetic pathways and expression profiles, consistent with a shared genetic program of appendage regeneration. Comparison of RNA-seq data from early Polypterus blastema to single-cell RNA-seq data from axolotl limb bud and limb regeneration stages shows that Polypterus and axolotl share a regeneration-specific genetic program. Collectively, our findings support a deep evolutionary origin of paired appendage regeneration in Osteichthyes and provide an evolutionary framework for studies on the genetic basis of appendage regeneration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolution; fin; limb; regeneration; tetrapod

Year:  2019        PMID: 31270239      PMCID: PMC6660751          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1900475116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  54 in total

1.  Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.

Authors:  M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Dedifferentiation of mammalian myotubes induced by msx1.

Authors:  S J Odelberg; A Kollhoff; M T Keating
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-12-22       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Why is limb regeneration possible in amphibians but not in reptiles, birds, and mammals?

Authors:  Frietson Galis; Günter P Wagner; Elizabeth L Jockusch
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  Limb regeneration in larvae and metamorphosing individuals of the South African clawed toad.

Authors:  J N DENT
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 1.804

6.  Nerve-dependent and -independent events in blastema formation during Xenopus froglet limb regeneration.

Authors:  Makoto Suzuki; Akira Satoh; Hiroyuki Ide; Koji Tamura
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  Inhibition of Sonic hedgehog signaling leads to posterior digit loss in Ambystoma mexicanum: parallels to natural digit reduction in urodeles.

Authors:  Geffrey F Stopper; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.780

8.  Expression of fibroblast growth factors 4, 8, and 10 in limbs, flanks, and blastemas of Ambystoma.

Authors:  Randolph N Christensen; Michael Weinstein; Roy A Tassava
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.780

Review 9.  Old questions, new tools, and some answers to the mystery of fin regeneration.

Authors:  Marie-Andrée Akimenko; Manuel Marí-Beffa; José Becerra; Jacqueline Géraudie
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.780

10.  Pectoral fin and girdle development in the basal actinopterygians Polyodon spathula and Acipenser transmontanus.

Authors:  Marcus C Davis; Neil H Shubin; Allan Force
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.804

View more
  14 in total

1.  Characterization of mouse Bmp5 regulatory injury element in zebrafish wound models.

Authors:  Ian S Heller; Catherine A Guenther; Ana M Meireles; William S Talbot; David M Kingsley
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Salamander-like tail regeneration in the West African lungfish.

Authors:  Kellen Matos Verissimo; Louise Neiva Perez; Aline Cutrim Dragalzew; Gayani Senevirathne; Sylvain Darnet; Wainna Renata Barroso Mendes; Ciro Ariel Dos Santos Neves; Erika Monteiro Dos Santos; Cassia Nazare de Sousa Moraes; Ahmed Elewa; Neil Shubin; Nadia Belinda Fröbisch; Josane de Freitas Sousa; Igor Schneider
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Eya2 promotes cell cycle progression by regulating DNA damage response during vertebrate limb regeneration.

Authors:  Konstantinos Sousounis; Donald M Bryant; Jose Martinez Fernandez; Samuel S Eddy; Stephanie L Tsai; Gregory C Gundberg; Jihee Han; Katharine Courtemanche; Michael Levin; Jessica L Whited
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Coordinated Gene Expression and Chromatin Regulation during Hydra Head Regeneration.

Authors:  Rabi Murad; Aide Macias-Muñoz; Ashley Wong; Xinyi Ma; Ali Mortazavi
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Changes in regeneration-responsive enhancers shape regenerative capacities in vertebrates.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Chi-Kuo Hu; An Zeng; Dana Alegre; Deqing Hu; Kirsten Gotting; Augusto Ortega Granillo; Yongfu Wang; Sofia Robb; Robert Schnittker; Shasha Zhang; Dillon Alegre; Hua Li; Eric Ross; Ning Zhang; Anne Brunet; Alejandro Sánchez Alvarado
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 63.714

6.  von Willebrand factor D and EGF domains is an evolutionarily conserved and required feature of blastemas capable of multitissue appendage regeneration.

Authors:  Nicholas D Leigh; Sofia Sessa; Aline C Dragalzew; Duygu Payzin-Dogru; Josane F Sousa; Anthony N Aggouras; Kimberly Johnson; Garrett S Dunlap; Brian J Haas; Michael Levin; Igor Schneider; Jessica L Whited
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.839

Review 7.  The engine initiating tissue regeneration: does a common mechanism exist during evolution?

Authors:  Yanmei Liu; Wilson Pak-Kin Lou; Ji-Feng Fei
Journal:  Cell Regen       Date:  2021-04-05

8.  Gular Cutaneous Fibrosarcoma and Anatomophysiological Considerations for Anaesthesia in a Saddled Bichir, Polypterus endlicheri endlicheri.

Authors:  Ayanna Carla N Phillips Savage; Karelma Frontera-Acevedo
Journal:  Case Rep Vet Med       Date:  2022-01-17

Review 9.  The Tentacular Spectacular: Evolution of Regeneration in Sea Anemones.

Authors:  Chloé A van der Burg; Peter J Prentis
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 10.  The Use of Larval Sea Stars and Sea Urchins in the Discovery of Shared Mechanisms of Metazoan Whole-Body Regeneration.

Authors:  Andrew Wolff; Veronica Hinman
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.