| Literature DB >> 31269942 |
Alexandre Juillerat1, Diane Tkach2, Brian W Busser2, Sonal Temburni2, Julien Valton2, Aymeric Duclert3, Laurent Poirot3, Stéphane Depil3, Philippe Duchateau4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Engineered therapeutic cells have attracted a great deal of interest due to their potential applications in treating a wide range of diseases, including cancer and autoimmunity. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells are designed to detect and kill tumor cells that present a specific, predefined antigen. The rapid expansion of targeted antigen beyond CD19, has highlighted new challenges, such as autoactivation and T-cell fratricide, that could impact the capacity to manufacture engineered CAR T-cells. Therefore, the development of strategies to control CAR expression at the surface of T-cells and their functions is under intense investigations.Entities:
Keywords: Cell engineering; Chimeric antigen receptor; Small molecule switch
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31269942 PMCID: PMC6610870 DOI: 10.1186/s12896-019-0537-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biotechnol ISSN: 1472-6750 Impact factor: 2.563
Fig. 1Schematic representation of the SWIFF-CAR principle. The SWIFF-CAR construct is composed of the CAR followed by a protease target site, a protease, and a degradation moiety (degron). In the absence of the protease inhibitor, the degron is cleaved from the CAR, allowing the exposition of the antigen targeting scFV at the T-cell surface (“ON” state, left panel). The presence of Asunaprevir inhibits the cleavage of the degron from the CAR by the HCV NS3 protease, leading to the degradation of the CAR by the T-cell proteolytic pathways (“OFF” state, right panel). Reproduced with permission from Cellectis Group
Fig. 2a Proliferation of T-cells in the presence of increasing concentrations of Asunaprevir. The total number of cells at different days cultured in presence of 100 nM, 500 nM or 1000 nM relative to 0 nM ASN is presented. Data are shown as the median of PBMC from 2 donors done in duplicate. b Cytokine quantification after co-culture of anti-CD22 CAR T-cells with target cells as a function of Asunaprevir concentration. Data are normalized to the maximum value (with or without 500 nM ASN) and shown as the mean ± SD (duplicates). c Schematic representation of the experimental setup to determine the effect of ASN on SWIFF-CAR surface expression. d MFI of CAR positive cells 3 days post CAR transduction (day 7) in the absence (blue bars) or presence of 500 nM ASN. Data are shown as the mean ± SD (two T-cell donors). e MFI of CAR surface detection at day 10 of ASN dose response (0–1000 nM). Blue Dots: No ASN, “Red” dots: dose response of ASN. Green dots: washout of previously ASN (500 nM) treated T-cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SD (two T-cell donors)
Fig. 3a Cytotoxicity (target cell killing) calculated during the 72 h coincubation in function of the ASN concentration (0–500 nM). b Cytotoxicity (target cell killing) calculated during the three 24 h periods in presence (500 nM) or absence of ASN. c Schematic representation of the washout experiment (top). The grey W boxes indicate the ASN washouts. Cytotoxicity (target cell killing) calculated during the 48 h coincubation. All data are shown as the median with 95% confidence intervals of three independent experiments. N = 3. Significance is determined by a standard t-test, * = p ≤ 0.05,** = p ≤ 0.01