Izna Ali1, Daniel Guidone2, Joseph A Nicolazzo3, Kim L R Brouwer1. 1. Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 2. Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia. 3. Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
AIMS: Patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common form of dementia, have reduced P-glycoprotein (P-gp) function at the blood-brain barrier. However, the effect of AD on P-gp function in peripheral organs, and the impact on medication efficacy and toxicity is unknown. In this study, clinical chart review and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling were employed to determine whether disease-associated changes in P-gp could be assessed from clinically measured digoxin concentrations in patients without and with dementia. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to compare digoxin dose and concentrations between cohorts. A PBPK model was developed to simulate changes in digoxin concentrations at single and multiple 62.5 and 125 μg/d doses due to reduced P-gp function in peripheral organs. RESULTS: Digoxin concentrations were similar between the nondementia (n = 75) and dementia (n = 72) cohorts (mean ± standard deviation; 0.64 ± 0.31 and 0.60 ± 0.34 ng/mL, respectively; -0.06 to 0.15, 95% confidence interval of difference). PBPK simulations showed that reduced P-gp function resulted in a significant increase in digoxin exposure (AUC), but not in Cmax . For example, when a 2-fold reduction in P-gp function was simulated in older people following multiple 125 μg/d digoxin doses, the AUC over the last dosing interval was increased compared to baseline (24.29 ± 3.94 vs 17.04 ± 3.46 ng/mL*h; 4.52 to 9.98); however, Cmax was similar (1.38 ± 0.20 vs 0.99 ± 0.18 ng/mL; -2.33 to 3.13). CONCLUSION: Clinically measured digoxin concentrations were not statistically different in patients with dementia. Based on PBPK simulations, digoxin AUC may need to be evaluated to adequately assess the impact of reduced P-gp function in peripheral organs.
AIMS: Patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common form of dementia, have reduced P-glycoprotein (P-gp) function at the blood-brain barrier. However, the effect of AD on P-gp function in peripheral organs, and the impact on medication efficacy and toxicity is unknown. In this study, clinical chart review and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling were employed to determine whether disease-associated changes in P-gp could be assessed from clinically measured digoxin concentrations in patients without and with dementia. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to compare digoxin dose and concentrations between cohorts. A PBPK model was developed to simulate changes in digoxin concentrations at single and multiple 62.5 and 125 μg/d doses due to reduced P-gp function in peripheral organs. RESULTS:Digoxin concentrations were similar between the nondementia (n = 75) and dementia (n = 72) cohorts (mean ± standard deviation; 0.64 ± 0.31 and 0.60 ± 0.34 ng/mL, respectively; -0.06 to 0.15, 95% confidence interval of difference). PBPK simulations showed that reduced P-gp function resulted in a significant increase in digoxin exposure (AUC), but not in Cmax . For example, when a 2-fold reduction in P-gp function was simulated in older people following multiple 125 μg/d digoxin doses, the AUC over the last dosing interval was increased compared to baseline (24.29 ± 3.94 vs 17.04 ± 3.46 ng/mL*h; 4.52 to 9.98); however, Cmax was similar (1.38 ± 0.20 vs 0.99 ± 0.18 ng/mL; -2.33 to 3.13). CONCLUSION: Clinically measured digoxin concentrations were not statistically different in patients with dementia. Based on PBPK simulations, digoxin AUC may need to be evaluated to adequately assess the impact of reduced P-gp function in peripheral organs.
Authors: James R Hall; April R Wiechmann; Leigh A Johnson; Melissa Edwards; Robert C Barber; Rebecca Cunningham; Meharvan Singh; Sid E O'Bryant Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2014 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: U L Larsen; L Hyldahl Olesen; C Guldborg Nyvold; J Eriksen; P Jakobsen; M Østergaard; H Autrup; V Andersen Journal: Scand J Clin Lab Invest Date: 2007 Impact factor: 1.713