Literature DB >> 31268568

Actions and Uncertainty: How Prenatally Diagnosed Variants of Uncertain Significance Become Actionable.

Allison Werner-Lin, Judith L M Mccoyd, Barbara A Bernhardt.   

Abstract

The development of genomic technologies has seemed almost magical. Excitement about it, both in medicine and among the public, stems from the belief that genomic techniques will illuminate the causes of health and disease, will lead to effective interventions for both rare and common genetic conditions, and will inform reproductive decision-making. Novel diagnostic tools, however, are often deployed before targeted therapies are developed, tested, or available and before their psychosocial implications are explored. Newer technologies such as prenatal whole exome screening are seen as offering "decisional autonomy" to expectant parents, although such technologies identify information about genetic sequencing that may not have clear meaning. The "therapeutic gap" between the ability to conduct genetic sequencing and the ability to fully understand what the test results mean, much less what treatments to offer, leaves families with complex and unclear information they cannot act upon with confidence during pregnancy. In this essay, we will consider the psychosocial and ethical implications of such assumptions-and of the uncertain information produced by these technologies-for individuals and families and for societal aspects such as medical service usage and demographic inequities.
© 2019 The Hastings Center.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31268568     DOI: 10.1002/hast.1018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep        ISSN: 0093-0334            Impact factor:   2.683


  4 in total

1.  Genetic Testing Is Messier in Practice than in Theory: Lessons from Neonatology.

Authors:  Katharine Press Callahan; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  Is there a way to reduce the inequity in variant interpretation on the basis of ancestry?

Authors:  Paul S Appelbaum; Wylie Burke; Erik Parens; David A Zeevi; Laura Arbour; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Vence L Bonham; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 11.043

Review 3.  Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniele Guadagnolo; Gioia Mastromoro; Francesca Di Palma; Antonio Pizzuti; Enrica Marchionni
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-02

Review 4.  Receiving results of uncertain clinical relevance from population genetic screening: systematic review & meta-synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Faye Johnson; Fiona Ulph; Rhona MacLeod; Kevin W Southern
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 5.351

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.