Literature DB >> 31268465

National and State Estimates of Lost Earnings From Cancer Deaths in the United States.

Farhad Islami1, Kimberly D Miller1, Rebecca L Siegel1, Zhiyuan Zheng1, Jingxuan Zhao1, Xuesong Han1, Jiemin Ma1, Ahmedin Jemal1, K Robin Yabroff1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Information on the economic burden of cancer mortality can serve as a tool in setting policies and prioritizing resources for cancer prevention and control. However, contemporary data are lacking for the United States nationally and by state.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate lost earnings due to death from cancer overall and for the major cancers in the United States nationally and by state. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Person-years of life lost (PYLL) were calculated using numbers of cancer deaths and life expectancy data in individuals aged 16 to 84 years who died from cancer in the United States in 2015. The annual median earnings in the United States were used to assign a monetary value for each PYLL by age and sex. Cancer mortality and life expectancy data were obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics and annual median earnings from the US Census Bureau's 2016 Current Population Survey's March Annual Social and Economic Supplement. Data analysis was performed from October 22, 2018, to February 25, 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Lost earnings due to cancer death, represented as estimated future wages in the absence of premature death.
RESULTS: A total of 8 739 939 person-years of life were lost to cancer death in persons aged 16 to 84 years in the United States in 2015, translating to lost earnings of $94.4 billion (95% CI, $91.7 billion-$97.3 billion). For individual cancer sites, lost earnings were highest for lung cancer ($21.3 billion), followed by colorectal ($9.4 billion), female breast ($6.2 billion), and pancreatic ($6.1 billion) cancer. Age-standardized lost earning rates per 100 000 were lowest in the West and highest in the South, ranging from $19.6 million (95% CI, $19.1 million-$20.2 million) in Utah to $35.3 million ($34.4 million-$36.3 million) in Kentucky. Approximately 2.4 million PYLL and $27.7 billion (95% CI, $26.9 billion-$28.5 billion) in lost earnings (29.3% of total that occurred in 2015) would have been avoided in 2015 if all states had the same age-specific PYLL or lost earning rates as Utah. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our findings indicate large state variation in the economic burden of cancer and suggest the potential for substantial financial benefit through delivery of effective cancer prevention, screening, and treatment to minimize premature cancer mortality in all states.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31268465      PMCID: PMC6613311          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  13 in total

1.  Persistent Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Tell-Tale Sign for Implementing New Guidelines in Younger Adults.

Authors:  Po-Hong Liu; Nina N Sanford; Peter S Liang; Amit G Singal; Caitlin C Murphy
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.090

2.  Productivity Loss and Indirect Costs for Patients Newly Diagnosed with Early- versus Late-Stage Cancer in the USA: A Large-Scale Observational Research Study.

Authors:  Ze Cong; Oth Tran; James Nelson; Monica Silver; Karen Chung
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer: Financial Risk and Expenditures in the United States, 2008 to 2017.

Authors:  Loren Saulsberry; Chuanhong Liao; Dezheng Huo
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 8.013

4.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Lost Earnings From Cancer Deaths in the United States.

Authors:  Jingxuan Zhao; Kimberly D Miller; Farhad Islami; Zhiyuan Zheng; Xuesong Han; Jiemin Ma; Ahmedin Jemal; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2020-06-03

Review 5.  Multidisciplinary standards of care and recent progress in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Aaron J Grossberg; Linda C Chu; Christopher R Deig; Eliot K Fishman; William L Hwang; Anirban Maitra; Daniel L Marks; Arnav Mehta; Nima Nabavizadeh; Diane M Simeone; Colin D Weekes; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-07-19       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Productivity costs associated with metastatic breast cancer in younger, midlife, and older women.

Authors:  Justin G Trogdon; Xuejun Liu; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Jason Rotter; Donatus U Ekwueme; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 6.921

7.  Assessing the Costs of Screening for Ovarian Cancer in the United States: An Evolving Analysis.

Authors:  Justin W Gorski; McKell Quattrone; John R van Nagell; Edward J Pavlik
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-25

8.  The CDC Colorectal Cancer Control Program, 2009-2015.

Authors:  Djenaba A Joseph; Amy DeGroff
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Population-level economic burden of lung cancer in China: Provisional prevalence-based estimations, 2017-2030.

Authors:  Chengcheng Liu; Jufang Shi; Hong Wang; Xinxin Yan; Le Wang; Jiansong Ren; Mark Parascandola; Wanqing Chen; Min Dai
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  Association of Sociodemographic and Health-Related Factors With Receipt of Nondefinitive Therapy Among Younger Men With High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander F Bagley; Mitchell S Anscher; Seungtaek Choi; Steven J Frank; Karen E Hoffman; Deborah A Kuban; Sean E McGuire; Quynh-Nhu Nguyen; Brian Chapin; Ana Aparicio; Todd A Pezzi; Grace L Smith; Benjamin D Smith; Kenneth Hess; Chad Tang
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.