| Literature DB >> 31267177 |
Eliza Wasilewska1, Krzysztof Kuziemski2, Marek Niedoszytko2, Barbara Kaczorowska-Hać3, Maciej Niedzwiecki3, Sylwia Małgorzewicz4, Ewa Jassem2.
Abstract
Childhood leukaemia survivors (CLS) are known to have developed long-term impairment of lung function. The reasons for that complication are only partially known. The aims of this study were to assess pulmonary function in CLS and identify (1) risk factors and (2) clinical manifestations for the impairment of airflow and lung diffusion. The study group included 74 CLS: 46 treated with chemotherapy alone (HSCT-), 28 with chemotherapy and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT+), and 84 healthy subjects (control group (CG)). Spirometry and diffusion limit of carbon monoxide (DLCO) tests were performed in all subjects. Ten (14%) survivors had restrictive, five (7%) had obstructive pattern, and 47 (66%) had reduced DLCO. The age at diagnosis, type of transplant, and type of conditioning regimen did not significantly affect the pulmonary function tests. The DLCO%pv were lower in CLS than in CG (p < 0.03) and in the HSCT+ than in the HSCT- survivors (p < 0.05). The pulmonary infection increased the risk of diffusion impairment (OR 5.1, CI 1.16-22.9, p = 0.019). DLCO was reduced in survivors who experienced CMV lung infection (p < 0.001). The main symptom of impaired lung diffusion was poor tolerance of exercise (p < 0.005). The lower lung diffusion capacity is the most frequent abnormality in CLS. HSCT and pulmonary infection, in particular with CMV infection, are strong risk factors for impairment of lung diffusion capacity in CLS. Clinical manifestation of DLCO impairment is poor exercise tolerance. A screening for respiratory abnormalities in CLS seems to be of significant importance.Entities:
Keywords: Childhood leukaemia survivors; Cytomegalovirus; Lung diffusion capacity; Pulmonary function
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31267177 PMCID: PMC6700051 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-019-03745-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Hematol ISSN: 0939-5555 Impact factor: 3.673
Fig. 1156 subjects (74 survivors and 84 healthy subjects as CG) included in the study
Survivor characteristics
| Epidemiological data | |
| Gender F/M ( | 35/39 |
| ALL ( | 59 |
| ANLL ( | 15 |
| Age at follow-up | |
| Years; mean (range) | 13 (7–25) |
| Interval: therapy-follow-up | |
| Years; mean (range) | 6.2 (5–17) |
| Methods of treatment ( | |
| BFM 90 | 40 |
| ALLIC 2002 | 9 |
| LMB 89 | 8 |
| REZ BFM 96 | 5 |
| New York II | 6 |
| ANLL 98 | 11 |
| HSCT Allo/Auto | 16/12 |
ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; ANLL, acute non-lymphoblastic leukaemia; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; n, number of survivors
Retrospective pulmonary toxicity agents
| Cumulative doses of cytostatic (g/m2/patient) (range) | |
| Methotrexate | 18.4 (7.8–22.9) |
| Cyclophosphamide | 4.2 (3.7–8.6) |
| Arabinoside cytosine | 10.84 (7.2–13.5) |
| Busulfan | 16 |
| Melphalan | 14 |
| FTBI (no. of patients) | |
| Lungs 9 Gy | 12 |
| Complications—pneumonia (no. of pneumonia incidence) | |
| Bacterial | 11 |
| Fungal | 25 |
| CMV | 17 |
| UNE | 19 |
FTBI, fractionated total body irradiated; CMV, cytomegalovirus; UNE, unknown aetiology
Results of the pulmonary function tests
| Parameter | Total survivors | Control group | HSCT(−) | HSCT(+) | CMV(−) | CMV(+) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value of PFT (%pv mean (range)) | |||||||
| FVC | 96 (66–133) | 96 (78–134) | 95 (71–127) | 93 (66–133) | 95 (79–133) | 94 (66–124) | |
| FEV1 | 95 (55–142) | 98 (83–148) | 96 (55–129) | 95 (58–142) | 95 (76–142) | 94 (55–124) | |
| FEV1%/FVC | 96 (61–118) | 103 (83–133) | 96 (61–114) | 95 (68–118) | 94 (69–118) | 95 (61–102) | |
| DLCO | 67 (33–93) | 76 (59–90) | 71 (50–90) | 60 (33–93) | 69 (48–102) | 58 (33–87) | |
| DLCO/VA | 84 (55–113) | 98 (73–132) | 89 (66–113) | 77 (55–100) | 87 (63–113) | 77 (55–110) | |
| PFT dysfunction ( | |||||||
| Obstructive | 5 (7%) | 0 | 4 (9%) | 1 (4%) | 4 (7%) | 1 (6%) | |
| Restrictive | 10 (14%) | 0 | 4 (9%) | 6 (22%) | 7 (12%) | 3 (18%) | |
| Decrease DLCO | 47 (66%) | 9 (21%) | 27 (61%) | 20 (74%) | 33 (58%) | 14 (82%) | |
| Decrease DLCO/VA | 17 (24%) | 0 | 6 (14%) | 11 (41%) | 10 (17%) | 7 (41%) | |
%pv, per cent of predicted values; VC, vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC, forced vital capacity; DLCO, diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide corrected for haemoglobin content; DLCO/VA, diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide corrected for haemoglobin content and for alveolar volume; n, number of survivors
*Total survivors vs. control group; **HSCT(−) vs. (+); ***CMV (−) vs. (+)
Fig. 2Value of DLCO/VA%pv in the CMV−HSCT+ and CMV+HSCT+ group (p < 0.005) and also the CMV+HSCT+ and control group (CG) (p < 0.00005). CMV, cytomegalovirus; HSCT, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Diffusion capacity in symptomatic survivors
| Parameter | Symptomatic survivors | DLCO/VA normal | DLCO/VA decrease | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intolerance of exercise | 9 | 2 | 7 | |
| Dyspnoea | 3 | 1 | 2 | |
| Cough | 19 | 8 | 11 |