Literature DB >> 31266853

Prognostic Impact of Pregnancy in Korean Patients with Breast Cancer.

Mihong Choi1, Jiyeon Han2, Bo Ram Yang2, Myoung-Jin Jang2, Miso Kim1,3, Tae-Yong Kim1,3, Seock-Ah Im1,3, Han-Byoel Lee4, Hyeong-Gon Moon4, Wonshik Han4, Dong-Young Noh4, Kyung-Hun Lee5,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy concurrent with, shortly before, or after breast cancer poses unique challenges because hormonal changes in pregnancy potentially interact with breast cancer outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied a cohort of 3,687 female patients of reproductive age (<50 years) with breast cancer, linking a large institutional database and the nationwide claims database to comprehensively capture exposure status and tumor characteristics. Exposures included breast cancer during pregnancy, postpartum breast cancer (<12 months after delivery), and pregnancy after breast cancer.
RESULTS: Forty-five patients with postpartum breast cancer were significantly more likely to have advanced stage, hormone receptor-negative tumor and to be younger than 35 years at diagnosis than those without postpartum breast cancer. This trend was not observed with 18 patients with breast cancer during pregnancy. The unadjusted 5-year survival rates were 77% versus 96% for patients with postpartum breast cancer versus their counterparts, 89% versus 96% for patients with breast cancer during pregnancy versus their counterparts, and 98% versus 96% for patients with pregnancy after breast cancer versus their counterparts, respectively. In the multivariable analyses, postpartum breast cancer exhibited hazard ratios for death of 1.57 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-2.99), whereas those for breast cancer during pregnancy and pregnancy after breast cancer were 1.09 (95% CI, 0.15-7.91) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.26-2.83), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Postpartum breast cancer, but not breast cancer during pregnancy, was associated with advanced stage, younger age at diagnosis (<35 years), hormone receptor-negative disease, and poorer survival. Pregnancy after breast cancer did not compromise overall survival. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Although pregnancy around the time of diagnosis of breast cancer is expected to become increasingly common with maternal age at first childbirth on the rise, data on the prognostic impact of pregnancy have been inconsistent and rare from Asian populations. In this investigation of a Korean patient cohort with breast cancer, pregnancy-associated breast cancer was associated with advanced stage, younger age at diagnosis (<35 years), hormone receptor-negative disease, and poorer survival. This adverse impact of pregnancy on the prognosis was apparent with postpartum breast cancer but not observed with breast cancer during pregnancy. Pregnancy after breast cancer did not compromise overall survival. © AlphaMed Press 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Postpartum; Pregnancy; Pregnancy‐associated breast cancer

Year:  2019        PMID: 31266853      PMCID: PMC6975968          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  30 in total

Review 1.  Introduction: health of the health care system in Korea.

Authors:  Dong Soo Kim
Journal:  Soc Work Public Health       Date:  2010-03

Review 2.  Heightened risk of breast cancer following pregnancy: could lasting systemic immune alterations contribute?

Authors:  Keren Shakhar; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Prognostic impact of pregnancy after breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Hatem A Azim; Niels Kroman; Marianne Paesmans; Shari Gelber; Nicole Rotmensz; Lieveke Ameye; Leticia De Mattos-Arruda; Barbara Pistilli; Alvaro Pinto; Maj-Britt Jensen; Octavi Cordoba; Evandro de Azambuja; Aron Goldhirsch; Martine J Piccart; Fedro A Peccatori
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Systemic stromal effects of estrogen promote the growth of estrogen receptor-negative cancers.

Authors:  Piyush B Gupta; David Proia; Oya Cingoz; Janusz Weremowicz; Stephen P Naber; Robert A Weinberg; Charlotte Kuperwasser
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Prognosis of women with primary breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: results from an international collaborative study.

Authors:  Frédéric Amant; Gunter von Minckwitz; Sileny N Han; Marijke Bontenbal; Alistair E Ring; Jerzy Giermek; Hans Wildiers; Tanja Fehm; Sabine C Linn; Bettina Schlehe; Patrick Neven; Pieter J Westenend; Volkmar Müller; Kristel Van Calsteren; Brigitte Rack; Valentina Nekljudova; Nadia Harbeck; Michael Untch; Petronella O Witteveen; Kathrin Schwedler; Christoph Thomssen; Ben Van Calster; Sibylle Loibl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Transient increase in the risk of breast cancer after giving birth.

Authors:  M Lambe; C Hsieh; D Trichopoulos; A Ekbom; M Pavia; H O Adami
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-07-07       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prognosis of pregnancy-associated breast cancer.

Authors:  J A Petrek; R Dukoff; A Rogatko
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Is breast cancer the same disease in Asian and Western countries?

Authors:  Stanley P L Leong; Zhen-Zhou Shen; Tse-Jia Liu; Gaurav Agarwal; Tomoo Tajima; Nam-Sun Paik; Kerstin Sandelin; Anna Derossis; Hiram Cody; William D Foulkes
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of breast cancer patients associated with pregnancy and lactation: analysis of case-control study in Japan.

Authors:  T Ishida; T Yokoe; F Kasumi; G Sakamoto; M Makita; T Tominaga; K Simozuma; K Enomoto; K Fujiwara; T Nanasawa
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1992-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Survival outcomes following pregnancy or assisted reproductive technologies after breast cancer: A population-based study.

Authors:  J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Jose Zubizarreta; Roni Nitecki; Alexander Melamed; Shuangshuang Fu; Kirsten Jorgensen; Paula C Brady; Valerie L Baker; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Sharon H Giordano; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.921

2.  Prognosis of pregnancy-associated breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chunchun Shao; Zhigang Yu; Juan Xiao; Liyuan Liu; Fanzhen Hong; Yuan Zhang; Hongying Jia
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 3.  Discussing motherhood when the oncological prognosis is dire: ethical considerations for physicians.

Authors:  Alma Linkeviciute; Barbara Buonomo; Nicola Fazio; Francesca Spada; Fedro A Peccatori
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2020-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.